Cited by 58Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

CSF synaptic protein concentrations are raised in those with atypical Alzheimer’s disease but not frontotemporal dementia

Open access
Clarke, Mica T. M., Brinkmalm, Ann, Foiani, Martha S., Woollacott, Ione O. C., Heller, Carolin, Heslegrave, Amanda, Keshavan, Ashvini, Fox, Nick C. +5 more·2019·Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

Abstract

Background: Increased CSF levels of a number of synaptic markers have been reported in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but little is known about their concentrations in frontotemporal dementia (FTD). We investigated this in three synaptic proteins, neurogranin, SNAP-25, and synaptotagmin-1. Methods: CSF samples were analysed from 66 patients with a disorder in the FTD spectrum and 19 healthy controls. Patients were stratified by their tau to Aβ 42 ratio: those with a ratio of > 1 considered as having likely AD pathology, i.e. an atypical form of AD (‘AD biomarker’ group [n = 18]), and < 1 as likely FTD pathology (‘FTD biomarker’ group [n = 48]). A subgroup analysis compared those in the FTD group with likely tau (n = 7) and TDP-43 (n = 18) pathology. Concentrations of neurogranin were measured using two different ELISAs (Ng22 and Ng36), and concentrations of two SNAP-25 fragments (SNAP-25tot and SNAP-25aa40) and synaptotagmin-1 were measured via mass spectrometry. Results: The AD biomarker group had significantly higher concentrations of all synaptic proteins compared to controls except for synaptotagmin-1 where there was only a trend to increased levels—Ng22, AD mean 232.2 (standard deviation 138.9) pg/ml, controls 137.6 (95.9); Ng36, 225.5 (148.8) pg/ml, 130.0 (80.9); SNAP-25tot, 71.4 (27.9) pM, 53.5 (11.7); SNAP-25aa40, 14.0 (6.3), 7.9 (2.3) pM; and synaptotagmin-1, 287.7 (156.0) pM, 238.3 (71.4). All synaptic measures were significantly higher in the atypical AD group than the FTD biomarker group except for Ng36 where there was only a trend to increased levels—Ng22, 114.0 (117.5); Ng36, 171.1 (75.2); SNAP-25tot, 49.2 (16.7); SNAP-25aa40, 8.2 (3.4); and synaptotagmin-1, 197.1 (78.9). No markers were higher in the FTD biomarker group than controls. No significant differences were seen in the subgroup analysis, but there was a trend to increased levels in those with likely tau pathology. Conclusions: No CSF synaptic proteins have been shown to be abnormal in those with likely FTD pathologically. Higher CSF synaptic protein concentrations of neurogranin, SNAP-25, and synaptotagmin-1 appear to be related to AD pathology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13195-019-0564-2

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clarke, M. T. M., Brinkmalm, A., Foiani, M. S., Woollacott, I. O. C., Heller, C., Heslegrave, A., Keshavan, A., Fox, N. C., Schott, J. M., Warren, J. D., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., & Rohrer, J. D.
Affiliations
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • UK Dementia Research Institute (GB)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Rohrer, Jonathan D.
Venue
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Published
2019-12
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
105-105
ISSN
1758-9193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2996155157
Cited by
58
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s Research & Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MR/M008525/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
atypical Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, synaptic proteins, neurogranin, SNAP-25, synaptotagmin-1, tau pathology, TDP-43 pathology, neurodegeneration, Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, neurofibrillary tangles
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Peptide Fragments, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Synaptosomal-Associated Protein 25, Synaptotagmin I, Neurogranin, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review