Cited by 16Herpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsAnimal Virus Infections StudiesVirology and Viral Diseases

Replication characteristics of equine herpesvirus 1 and equine herpesvirus 3: comparative analysis using ex vivo tissue cultures.

Open access
Negussie, Haileleul, Li, Yewei, Tessema, Tesfaye Sisay, Nauwynck, Hans J.·2016·Veterinary Research

Abstract

Replication kinetics and invasion characteristics of equine herpesvirus-1 and -3 (EHV-1/-3) in nasal and vaginal mucosae were compared using explants. The explants were cultured during 96 h with little change in viability. The tissues were inoculated with EHV-1 03P37 (neuropathogenic), 97P70 (abortigenic) and EHV-3 04P57, collected at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h post inoculation (pi) and stained for viral antigens. Both EHV-1 and EHV-3 replicated in a plaquewise manner. The plaques were already observed at 24 h pi, their size increased over time and did not directly cross the basement membrane (BM). However, EHV-1 infected the monocytic cells (MC) and hijacked these cells to invade the lamina propria. In contrast, EHV-3 replication was fully restricted to epithelial cells; the virus did not breach the BM via a direct cell-to-cell spread nor used infected MC. EHV-1-induced plaques were larger in nasal mucosa compared to vaginal mucosa. The opposite was found for EHV-3-induced plaques. Both EHV-1 strains replicated with comparable kinetics in nasal mucosa. However, the extent of replication of the abortigenic strain in vaginal mucosa was significantly higher than that of the neuropathogenic strain. Two-to-five-fold lower numbers of EHV-1-infected MC underneath the BM were found in vaginal mucosa than in nasal mucosa. Our study has shown that (i) EHV-1 has developed in evolution a predisposition for respiratory mucosa and EHV-3 for vaginal mucosa, (ii) abortigenic EHV-1 replicates better in vaginal mucosa than neuropathogenic EHV-1 and (iii) EHV-3 demonstrated a strict epithelial tropism whereas EHV-1 in addition hijacked MC to invade the lamina propria.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13567-016-0305-5

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In ex vivo experiments, single infected epithelial cells were visible at 12 h post-inoculation and EHV-1-induced plaques were observed in equine nasal and nasopharyngeal explants starting from 24 h post-inoculation.

    “In ex vivo experiments, single infected epithelial cells were visible at 12 h post-inoculation (hpi) and EHV-1-induced plaques were observed in the epithelium of equine nasal and nasopharyngeal explants starting from 24 hpi (Vandekerckhove et al., 2010; Negussie et al., 2016).”

    From The Pathogenesis and Immune Evasive Mechanisms of Equine Herpesvirus Type 1 (2021) · cites this paper as Negussie et al., 2016

    The Results (Invasion characteristics; page unavailable) report EHV-1 plaques in the epithelium by 24 h post-inoculation, including in nasal explants. This paper studied nasal and vaginal mucosa, not nasopharyngeal explants. Its Methods sampled at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h, so it does not support the claim that single infected epithelial cells were visible at 12 h. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Negussie, H., Li, Y., Tessema, T. S., & Nauwynck, H. J.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Addis Ababa University (ET)
Corresponding author
  • Negussie, Haileleul
  • Nauwynck, Hans J.
Venue
Veterinary Research
Published
2016-01-15
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
19-19
ISSN
  • 0928-4249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1297-9716
OpenAlex
W2235050815
Cited by
15
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Veterinary Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Universiteit Gent
  • Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
equine herpesvirus 1, viral replication kinetics, mucosal invasion, nasal mucosa, vaginal mucosa, monocytic cells, lamina propria, plaque formation, tissue explants, viral tropism
MeSH terms
Animals, Herpesvirus 3, Equid, Herpesvirus 1, Equid, Female, Horses, Mucous Membrane, Nose, Vagina, Virus Replication, Tissue Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review