Cited by 11Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

A novel brief treatment for methamphetamine use disorders in South Africa: a randomised feasibility trial

Open access
Sorsdahl, K., Stein, D. J., Pasche, S., Jacobs, Y., Kader, R., Odlaug, B., Richter, S., Myers, B. +1 more·2021·Addiction Science & Clinical Practice

Abstract

Background: Effective brief treatments for methamphetamine use disorders (MAUD) are urgently needed to complement longer more intensive treatments in low and middle income countries, including South Africa. To address this gap, the purpose of this randomised feasibility trial was to determine the feasibility of delivering a six-session blended imaginal desensitisation, plus motivational interviewing (IDMI) intervention for adults with a MAUD. Methods: We enrolled 60 adults with a MAUD and randomly assigned them 1:1 to the IDMI intervention delivered by clinical psychologists and a control group who we referred to usual care. Feasibility measures, such as rates of recruitment, consent to participate in the trial and retention, were calculated. Follow-up interviews were conducted at 6 weeks and 3 months post-enrollment. Results: Over 9 months, 278 potential particiants initiated contact. Following initial screening 78 (28%) met inclusion criteria, and 60 (77%) were randomised. Thirteen of the 30 participants assigned to the treatment group completed the intervention. Both psychologists were highly adherent to the intervention, obtaining a fidelity rating of 91%. In total, 39 (65%) participants completed the 6-week follow-up and 40 (67%) completed the 3-month follow-up. The intervention shows potential effectiveness in the intention-to-treat analysis where frequency of methamphetamine use was significantly lower in the treatment than in the control group at both the 6 week and 3-month endpoints. No adverse outcomes were reported. Conclusions: This feasibility trial suggests that the locally adapted IDMI intervention is an acceptable and safe intervention as a brief treatment for MAUD in South Africa. Modifications to the study design should be considered in a fully powered, definitive controlled trial to assess this potentially effective intervention. Trial registration The trial is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (Trial ID: PACTR201310000589295)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13722-020-00209-3

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study reported on a seven-session intervention that incorporated multiple psychotherapy techniques including motivational enhancement therapy, cognitive therapy, behavior therapy, family therapy, relapse prevention, and exposure therapy.

    “One study reported on a seven-session intervention that incorporated multiple psychotherapy techniques including motivational enhancement therapy, cognitive therapy, behavior therapy, family therapy, relapse prevention, and exposure therapy [92].”

    From A scoping review of substance use brief interventions in Africa (2024) · cites this paper as [92]

    Methods > Interventions (page unavailable) lists motivational enhancement, behavioural intervention, exposure therapy, cognitive therapy, relapse prevention, and a seventh session involving family. But it marks that family session as optional and calls it “family involvement,” not family therapy. The Discussion describes completion of all six sessions, so calling this an unqualified seven-session intervention overstates the source. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In adults in South Africa, there were no significant differences between groups for the other secondary outcome measures.

    “There were no significant differences between groups for the other secondary out-come measures.”
  • In adults in South Africa, the intervention group reported significantly lower anxiety scores than the control group (p = 0.049) at both 6 weeks and at 3 months post-intervention.

    “The intervention group reported significantly lower anxiety scores than the control group (p = 0.049) at both 6 weeks and at 3 months post-intervention.”
  • In adults in South Africa, the intervention group displayed greater reductions in frequency of methamphetamine use than the control group at week 6 and month 3 in the intention-to-treat analysis.

    “In the intention-to-treat analysis, the intervention group displayed greater reductions in frequency of methamphetamine use than the control group at week 6 and month 3.”
  • In adults in South Africa, of the 30 participants randomized to the intervention group, 13 (43%) completed all six sessions.

    “Of the 30 participants who were randomized to the intervention group, 26 completed session one, 24 completed two sessions, 21 completed three sessions, 18 completed four sessions, 15 completed five sessions and 13 (43%) completed all six sessions.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sorsdahl, K., Stein, D. J., Pasche, S., Jacobs, Y., Kader, R., Odlaug, B., Richter, S., Myers, B., & Grant, J. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Sorsdahl, K.
Venue
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Published
2021-01-07
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
3-3
ISSN
  • 1940-0632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-0640
OpenAlex
W3118404258
Cited by
11
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction Science & Clinical Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Capetown
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
methamphetamine dependence, short-term treatment, motivational interviewing, feasibility, treatment retention, medication adherence, addiction treatment, South Africa
MeSH terms
Adult, Crisis Intervention, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Methamphetamine, South Africa, Amphetamine-Related Disorders, Intention to Treat Analysis, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review