Cited by 120Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 51 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Effects of therapeutic horseback riding on post-traumatic stress disorder in military veterans

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Large numbers of post-deployment U.S. veterans are diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and/or traumatic brain injury (TBI), leading to an urgent need for effective interventions to reduce symptoms and increase veterans' coping. PTSD includes anxiety, flashbacks, and emotional numbing. The symptoms increase health care costs for stress-related illnesses and can make veterans' civilian life difficult. METHODS: We used a randomized wait-list controlled design with repeated measures of U.S. military veterans to address our specific aim to test the efficacy of a 6-week therapeutic horseback riding (THR) program for decreasing PTSD symptoms and increasing coping self-efficacy, emotion regulation, social and emotional loneliness. Fifty-seven participants were recruited and 29 enrolled in the randomized trial. They were randomly assigned to either the horse riding group (n = 15) or a wait-list control group (n = 14). The wait-list control group experienced a 6-week waiting period, while the horse riding group began THR. The wait-list control group began riding after 6 weeks of participating in the control group. Demographic and health history information was obtained from all the participants. PTSD symptoms were measured using the standardized PTSD Checklist-Military Version (PCL-M). The PCL-M as well as other instruments including, The Coping Self Efficacy Scale (CSES), The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and The Social and Emotional Loneliness Scale for Adults-short version (SELSA) were used to access different aspects of individual well-being and the PTSD symptoms. RESULTS: Participants had a statistically significant decrease in PTSD scores after 3 weeks of THR (P ≤ 0.01) as well as a statistically and clinically significant decrease after 6 weeks of THR (P ≤ 0.01). Logistic regression showed that participants had a 66.7% likelihood of having lower PTSD scores at 3 weeks and 87.5% likelihood at 6 weeks. Under the generalized linear model(GLM), our ANOVA findings for the coping self-efficacy, emotion regulation, and social and emotional loneliness did not reach statistical significance. The results for coping self-efficacy and emotion regulation trended in the predicted direction. Results for emotional loneliness were opposite the predicted direction. Logistic regression provided validation that outcome effects were caused by riding longer. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that THR may be a clinically effective intervention for alleviating PTSD symptoms in military veterans.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a randomized wait-list controlled trial of U.S. military veterans with PTSD or PTSD/TBI, a 6-week therapeutic horseback riding program was associated with statistically and clinically significant reductions in PTSD symptoms. Other outcomes—coping self-efficacy, emotion regulation, and social/emotional loneliness—did not reach statistical significance, though some trends moved in predicted directions.

Key findings

  • PTSD symptoms decreased significantly after 3 weeks of THR (P ≤ 0.01) and after 6 weeks (P ≤ 0.01); mean improvements were 6 points at 3 weeks and 13 points at 6 weeks, meeting the paper’s cited 5-point response and 10-point clinically meaningful thresholds.
  • Logistic regression showed a 66.7% likelihood of lower PTSD scores at 3 weeks and 87.5% at 6 weeks; overall participants had an 81.8% likelihood of improvement. 18/23 (78%) showed a decrease from baseline to 3 weeks, and 18/19 (94.74%) from baseline to 6 weeks.
  • Coping self-efficacy, emotion regulation, and social/emotional loneliness did not reach statistical significance; CSES and DERS trended in the predicted direction, while SELSA trended opposite the predicted direction (increased loneliness).
  • Instrument internal consistency was acceptable: PCL-M = 0.737, CSES = 0.868, DERS = 0.831, SELSA = 0.788.

Methods

  • Randomized wait-list controlled design with repeated measures; veterans with PTSD or PTSD/TBI participated in a 6-week THR program once per week, while the wait-list control group waited 6 weeks and then rode. Inclusion criteria included age ≥18, no longer active duty, weight ≤220 lb, able to walk 25 ft without assistance, and willingness to ride.
  • Measures included the PTSD Checklist-Military Version (PCL-M), Coping Self Efficacy Scale (CSES), Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), and Social and Emotional Loneliness Scale for Adults-short version (SELSA), plus demographic and health history questionnaires.
  • Analysis used repeated measures ANOVA, t-tests on difference scores, and logistic regression in SPSS Version 24, with significance set at P = 0.05. The abstract reports 57 recruited and 29 enrolled/randomized (15 riding, 14 wait-list); the methods/results describe 38 enrolled, 29 participating in THR, and 29 subjects with complete data for analysis.

Limitations

  • Paper-stated: small sample size limited power to detect changes in dependent variables; no longitudinal follow-up; the 6-week THR program may have been too short; recruitment was limited to veterans treated at the approving VA; travel, scheduling, weather, and staffing logistics complicated implementation; components of THR (e.g., grooming, staff interactions, driving, arena type) could not be isolated; selection bias exists because only veterans willing to ride enrolled; the SELSA may not capture spiritual/existential loneliness or experiential isolation.
  • Evident from the text: sample-flow numbers are inconsistent across the abstract and methods/results (e.g., 57 recruited vs. 38 enrolled vs. 29 analyzed; varying n’s across tables), and the wait-list conversion design creates repeated treatment data that complicate independence assumptions.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40779-018-0149-6

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Participant flowchart. *The Riding group data comprise the data of the waitlist control group collected at 0-, 3-, and 6-weeks after THR following the 6-week waiting period and those of the treatment group collected at 0-, 3-, and 6-week after THR
Fig. 1 Participant flowchart. *The Riding group data comprise the data of the waitlist control group collected at 0-, 3-, and 6-weeks after THR following the 6-week waiting period and those of the treatment group collected at 0-, 3-, and 6-week after THRCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 PTSD means of Riding group over time by total number of weeks ridden. The purpose of these analyses was to ascertain whether the significant decrease in PTSD found at 3 weeks of riding was sustained at 6weeks. Each participant (n = 19) was tested whether or not they rode for all the 6 weeks
Fig. 2 PTSD means of Riding group over time by total number of weeks ridden. The purpose of these analyses was to ascertain whether the significant decrease in PTSD found at 3 weeks of riding was sustained at 6weeks. Each participant (n = 19) was tested whether or not they rode for all the 6 weeksCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

43 Own result · 26 No full text of the sources · 22 Own interpretation · 18 Own method · 7 Not checked yet · 6 No basis given · 2 Partly supported · 2 Sources not found · 1 Supported so far · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 7 references — free account

Show all 55 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 46
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 41
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
72 of 72
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Independence of observations was presumed.

    “Independence of observations was also presumed.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    None of the prior veteran-reported THR studies employed widely used and standardized instruments to measure outcomes.

    “While these studies provide veteran reported evidence of THR, none employed widely used and standardized instruments to measure outcomes.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The wait-list control group would not have changes in outcome measures during the 6-week waitlist control period.

    “Veterans assigned to the waitlist control group were not expected to have any changes in outcome measures during the 6-week waitlist control period.”
3 of 3

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • ConsistentF(1, 17) = 10.678reported p = .005 · recomputed p = .005

    “F(1,17) = 10.678, p = .005”

  • ConsistentF(1, 17) = 8.75reported p = .009 · recomputed p = .009

    “F(1,17) = 8.750, p = .009”

2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
  2. Schell TL, Marshall GN. Survey of individuals previously deployed for OEF/OIF. In: Tanielian T, Jaycox LH, editors. Nvisible wounds of war: psychological and cognitive Injuries,Their consequences, and services to assist recovery. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation; 2008. p. 93.
  3. Strauss JL, Lang AJ. Complementary and alternative treatments for PTSD. PTSD Res Quart. 2012;23:1–3.
  4. McKay-Lyons M, Conway M, Roberts W. Effects of therapeutic riding on patients with multiple sclerosis: a preliminary trial. Physiother Can. 1988;40:104–9.
  5. Webster A, Pfotenhauer M, David E, Leyerer U, Rimpau W, Aldridge D, et al. Registration and evaluation of effects of hippotherapy with patients suffering from multiple sclerosis by means of electromyography and acceleration measurement. Sci J Therapeutic Riding. 1995;1:333–46.
  6. Duncan CR, Critchley S, Marland J. Can praxis: a model of equine assisted learning (EAL) for PTSD. CMJ. 2014;14:64–9.
  7. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
  8. Kazdin AE. Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research. 3rd ed. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 120

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, R. A., Albright, D. L., Marzolf, J. R., Bibbo, J. L., Yaglom, H. D., Crowder, S. M., Carlisle, G. K., Willard, A., Russell, C. L., Grindler, K., Osterlind, S., Wassman, M., & Harms, N.
Affiliations
  • Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
  • Enveloppes fluides : de la ville à l'exobiologie (FR)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Rebecca A.
Venue
Military Medical Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01-19
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
3-3
ISSN
2054-9369 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790625360
Cited by
105
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2
FWCI
9.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Military Medical Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Horses and Humans Research Foundation (#00040568)
  • University of Missouri Interdisciplinary Center on Aging (n/a)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
therapeutic riding, post-traumatic stress disorder, military veterans, PTSD symptom reduction, coping self-efficacy, emotion regulation, equine-assisted therapy, traumatic brain injury
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans, Logistic Models, Equine-Assisted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review