Cited by 742Human-Animal Interaction StudiesNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Neurophysiological Correlates of Affiliative Behaviour between Humans and Dogs

Odendaal, J.S.J, Meintjes, R.A·2003·The Veterinary Journal

Abstract

Few physiological parameters for positive human-companion animal contact have been identified and those that are established have all been in humans. The implication is that if the physiological reactions are mutual, dogs would experience the same psychological benefits from these neurophysiological changes as humans. Therefore, we have determined the role of certain neurochemicals during affiliation behaviour on an interspecies basis. Our results indicate that concentrations of beta-endorphin, oxytocin, prolactin, beta-phenylethylamine, and dopamine increased in both species after positive interspecies interaction, while that of cortisol decreased in the humans only. Indicators of mutual physiological changes during positive interaction between dog lovers and dogs may contribute to a better understanding of the human-animal bond in veterinary practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1090-0233(02)00237-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are positive associations between human-dog interactions and humans' endogenous oxytocin concentrations.

    “There are positive associations between human–dog interactions and humans’ endogenous oxytocin concentrations [6,7].”
  • Two main reasons underlie the development of ARBs in companion animals: first, many companion animals are social species eager for social contact, and the need for social contact with either conspecifics and/or humans can remain unfulfilled if owners work from nine to five, five days a week with the pet staying alone at home on a daily basis.

    “Two main reasons underlie the development of ARBs in our companion animals. First of all, a lot of companion animals are social species eager for social contact. In the human–companion animal bond, the need for social contact with either conspecifics and/or humans [70,71] can remain unfulfilled if owners work from nine to five, five days a week with the pet staying alone at home on a daily basis.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Odendaal, J. S. J., & Meintjes, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Pretoria (ZA)
Corresponding author
Odendaal, J.S.J
Venue
The Veterinary Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-05
Volume
165
Issue
3
Pages
296-301
ISSN
1090-0233 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034710031
Cited by
742
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 27
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Veterinary Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
human-dog interaction, affiliative behavior, interspecies interactions, neurochemicals, beta-endorphin, oxytocin, prolactin, phenylethylamine, dopamine, cortisol, human-animal bond, companion animals
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Animals, beta-Endorphin, Human-Animal Bond, Dogs, Dopamine, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oxytocin, Phenethylamines, Prolactin, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review