Cited by 31Sports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutritionThermoregulation and physiological responses

The reproducibility of 4-km time trial (TT) performance following individualised sodium bicarbonate supplementation: a randomised controlled trial in trained cyclists

Open access
Gough, Lewis Anthony, Deb, Sanjoy Kumar, Sparks, Andy, McNaughton, Lars Robert·2017·Sports Medicine - Open

Abstract

Individual time to peak blood bicarbonate (HCO3 −) has demonstrated good to excellent reproducibility following ingestion of both 0.2 g kg−1 body mass (BM) and 0.3 g kg−1 BM sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), but the consistency of the time trial (TT) performance response using such an individualised NaHCO3 ingestion strategy remains unknown. This study therefore evaluated the reproducibility of 4-km TT performance following NaHCO3 ingestion individualised to time to peak blood bicarbonate. Eleven trained male cyclists completed five randomised treatments with prior ingestion of 0.2 g kg−1 (SBC2) or 0.3 g kg−1 BM (SBC3) NaHCO3, on two separate occasions each, or a control trial entailing no supplementation. Participants completed a 4-km cycling TT on a Velotron ergometer where time to complete, power and speed were measured, whilst acid-base blood parameters were also recorded (pH and blood bicarbonate concentration HCO3 −) and lactate [La−]. Alkalosis was achieved prior to exercise in both SBC2 and SBC3, as pH and HCO3 − were greater compared to baseline (p < 0.001), with no differences between treatments (p > 0.05). The reproducibility of the mean absolute change from baseline to peak in HCO3 − was good in SBC2 (r = 0.68) and excellent in SBC3 (r = 0.78). The performance responses following both SBC2 and SBC3 displayed excellent reproducibility (r range = 0.97 to 0.99). Results demonstrate excellent reproducibility of exercise performance following individualised NaHCO3 ingestion, which is due to the high reproducibility of blood acid-base variables with repeat administration of NaHCO3. Using a time to peak HCO3 - strategy seems to cause no dose-dependent effects on performance for exercise of this duration and intensity; therefore, athletes may consider smaller doses of NaHCO3 to mitigate gastrointestinal (GI) discomfort.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40798-017-0101-4

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although 0.2 g/kg of sodium bicarbonate appears to be the minimum dose needed to improve exercise performance, there are still findings of gastrointestinal discomfort at this dose.

    “Although 0.2 g/kg of sodium bicarbonate appears to be the minimum dose needed to improve exercise performance, there are still findings of gastrointestinal discomfort at this dose (Gough et al., 2017).”

    From Acute enteric-coated sodium bicarbonate has negligible effect on anaerobic performance but affects metabolomics and attenuates the gastrointestinal response (2022) · cites this paper as Gough et al., 2017

    The Results (Effect of Treatment; page not provided) report faster 4-km time trials with 0.2 g/kg sodium bicarbonate than with the control treatment, and gastrointestinal discomfort was recorded at that dose. The study compared 0.2 with 0.3 g/kg but did not establish that 0.2 g/kg is the minimum effective dose. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [8]Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural science. New York: Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gough, L. A., Deb, S. K., Sparks, A., & McNaughton, L. R.
Affiliations
Edge Hill University (GB)
Corresponding author
Gough, Lewis Anthony
Venue
Sports Medicine - Open
Published
2017-09-21
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
34-34
ISSN
  • 2198-9761 (ISSN-L)
  • 2199-1170
OpenAlex
W2757272007
Cited by
30
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sports Medicine - Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • BCU Open Access Repository (Birmingham City University) (acceptedVersion)
  • WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edge Hill University (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Keywords
sodium bicarbonate supplementation, trained cyclists, blood bicarbonate, acid-base balance, alkalosis, lactate, exercise performance, dose dependence, gastrointestinal discomfort

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review