Cited by 63Sports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutritionCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Effects of various sodium bicarbonate loading protocols on the time-dependent extracellular buffering profile

Siegler, Jason C, Midgley, Adrian W, Polman, Remco C J, Lever, Robert·2010·Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Abstract

Although much research has investigated the types of exercise that are enhanced with sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) ingestion, to date, there has been limited research on the dosage and timing of ingestion that optimizes the associated ergogenic effects. This study investigated the effects of various NaHCO3 loading protocols on the time-dependent blood-buffering profile. Eight male volunteers (age, 22.4 +/- 5.7 yr; height, 179.8 +/- 9.6 cm, body mass, 76.3 +/- 14.1 kg) completed Part A, measures of alkalosis throughout 120 minutes after ingestion of various single NaHCO3 dosages (0.3 gxkg-1, 0.2 gxkg-1, 0.1 gxkg-1, and placebo); and Part B, similar profiles after alternative NaHCO3 loading protocols (single morning dosage [SMD], single evening dosage [SED], and dosages ingested on 3 consecutive evenings [CED]). Results from Part A are as follows. Blood buffering in the 0.1 gxkg-1 condition was significantly lower than the 0.2 g.kg-1 and 0.3 gxkg-1 conditions (p < 0.002), but there was no significant differences between the 0.2 gxkg -1and 0.3 g.kg-1 conditions (p = 0.34). Although the blood buffering was relatively constant in the 0.1 and 0.2 conditions, it was significantly higher at 60 minutes than at 100 minutes and 120 minutes in the 0.3 gxkg-1 condition (p < 0.05). Results from Part B are as follows. Blood buffering for SMD was significantly higher than for SED and CED (p < 0.05). Blood buffering in the SMD condition was significantly lower at 17:00 hours than at 11:00 hours…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181aeb154

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siegler, J. C., Midgley, A. W., Polman, R. C. J., & Lever, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Hull (GB)
  • University of Lancashire (GB)
Corresponding author
Siegler, Jason C
Venue
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2010-09
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
2551-2557
ISSN
1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091966313
Cited by
63
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
sodium bicarbonate, blood buffering, alkalosis, loading protocols, ergogenic aids, exercise performance
MeSH terms
Acid-Base Equilibrium, Alkalosis, Respiratory, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Humans, Male, Plasma, Time Factors, Single-Blind Method, Sodium Bicarbonate, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review