Cited by 8Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsPhysical Activity and HealthTime Series Analysis and Forecasting

A novel ViT-BILSTM model for physical activity intensity classification in adults using gravity-based acceleration

Open access
Wang, Lin, Luo, Zizhang, Zhang, Tianle·2025·BMC Biomedical Engineering

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to apply a novel hybrid framework incorporating a Vision Transformer (ViT) and bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) model for classifying physical activity intensity (PAI) in adults using gravity-based acceleration. Additionally, it further investigates how PAI and temporal window (TW) impacts the model’ s accuracy. Method: This research used the Capture-24 dataset, consisting of raw accelerometer data from 151 participants aged 18 to 91. Gravity-based acceleration was utilised to generate images encoding various PAIs. These images were subsequently analysed using the ViT-BiLSTM model, with results presented in confusion matrices and compared with baseline models. The model’s robustness was evaluated through temporal stability testing and examination of accuracy and loss curves. Result: The ViT-BiLSTM model excelled in PAI classification task, achieving an overall accuracy of 98.5% ± 1.48% across five TWs-98.7% for 1s, 98.1% for 5s, 98.2% for 10s, 99% for 15s, and 98.65% for 30s of TW. The model consistently exhibited superior accuracy in predicting sedentary (98.9% ± 1%) compared to light physical activity (98.2% ± 2%) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (98.2% ± 3%). ANOVA showed no significant accuracy variation across PAIs (F = 2.18, p = 0.13) and TW (F = 0.52, p = 0.72). Accuracy and loss curves show the model consistently improves its performance across epochs, demonstrating its excellent robustness. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the ViT-BiLSTM model’s efficacy in classifying PAI using gravity-based acceleration, with performance remaining consistent across diverse TWs and intensities. However, PAI and TW could result in slight variations in the model’s performance. Future research should concern and investigate the impact of gravity-based acceleration on PAI thresholds, which may influence model’s robustness and reliability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s42490-025-00088-2

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, L., Luo, Z., & Zhang, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Yangtze University (CN)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Wang, Lin
Venue
BMC Biomedical Engineering
Published
2025-02-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
2-2
ISSN
2524-4426 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407024896
Cited by
8
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
China Scholarship Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
Keywords
physical activity intensity classification, vision transformer, bidirectional LSTM, hybrid deep learning model, accelerometer data, sedentary behavior, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, light physical activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review