Cited by 38Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationSocial Policies and Healthcare ReformNursing Diagnosis and Documentation

Exploring needs and challenges for AI in nursing care-results of an explorative sequential mixed methods study

Open access
Seibert, Kathrin, Domhoff, Dominik, Fürstenau, Daniel, Biessmann, Felix, Schulte-Althoff, Matthias, Wolf-Ostermann, Karin·2023·BMC Digital Health

Abstract

Abstract Background and aim While artificial intelligence (AI) is being adapted for various life domains and applications related to medicine and healthcare, the use of AI in nursing practice is still scarce. The German Ministry for Education and Research funded a study in order to explore needs, application scenarios, requirements, facilitators and barriers for research and development projects in the context of AI in nursing care. Method A sequential explorative mixed methods study including a stakeholder and expert workshop ( N = 21), expert interviews ( N = 14), an online survey ( N = 53) and a Datathon ( N = 80) was conducted with an emphasis on qualitative data. Results Needs and application scenarios encompassed the micro- and meso-level of care and derived from typical phenomena inherent to nursing care as well as from skill- and staff mix and consequences arising from staff shortages, from the extend of informal care and an associated need for information and education of informal caregivers and nursing assistants. Requirements for and characteristics of successful research and development projects included regulatory, processual, technological, ethical and legal aspects and supportive eco-systems. Conclusion A key element in the design of research projects remains participatory and demand-driven development that aims to bring AI solutions out of the lab and into practice. However, influencing factors remain that are outside the sphere of influence of individual projects, in particular the creation of resilient legal foundations for data use and the use of AI in practice, standardization of data structures and the establishment of infrastructures for data exchange across institutions and projects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s44247-023-00015-2

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seibert et al. (48) highlight barriers such as limited data digitization, privacy and security concerns, and the complexity of nursing tasks that restrict AI to simpler functions.

    “Seibert et al. (48) highlight barriers such as limited data digitization, privacy and security concerns, and the complexity of nursing tasks that restrict AI to simpler functions.”
  • Seibert et al. (48) highlight the potential of AI to optimize staff scheduling and skill mix, improve route planning for home care services, and aid in institutional workflow management.

    “Seibert et al. (48) highlight the potential of AI to optimize staff scheduling and skill mix, improve route planning for home care services, and aid in institutional workflow management.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Kikuchi R. Application of artificial intelligence technology in Nursing stud- ies: a systematic review. Online J Nurs Inform. 2020. https:// www. himss. org/ resou rces/ appli catio narti ficial-intel ligen ce-techn ology-nursi ng-studi es-syste matic-review.
  2. Grosan C, Abraham A. Rule-Based Expert Systems. Intelligent Systems Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 17. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011.
  3. Lu DF, Street WN, Delaney C. Knowledge discovery: Detecting elderly patients with impaired mobility. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;122:121-3.
  4. Kaewprag P, Newton C, Vermillion B, Hyun S, Huang K, Machiraju R. Pre- dictive modeling for pressure ulcers from intensive care unit electronic health records. AMIA Joint Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2015;2015:82-6.
  5. Dan L, Mathews C. Automated measurement of pressure injury/ulcer through image processinG...WOCN Society's 49th Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, May 19-23, 2017. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2017;44:S59-S.
  6. Cramer EM, Seneviratne MG, Sharifi H, Ozturk A, Hernandez-Boussard T. Predicting the incidence of pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit using machine learning. EGEMS (Washington, DC). 2019;7(1):49.
  7. Wai AAP, Yuan-Wei K, Fook FS, Jayach, ran M, Biswas J, et al., editors. Sleep- ing patterns observation for bedsores and bed-side falls prevention. 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 2009; Minneapolis: IEEE.
  8. European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, McGrath J. Analysis of shortage and surplus occupa- tions 2020, Publications Office; 2020. https:// data. europa. eu/ doi/ 10. 2767/ 933528. · DOI
  9. Biessmann F, Golebiowski J, Rukat T, Lange D, Schmidt P. Automated data validation in machine learning systems. In: Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering. 2021.
  10. Lohr C, Eder E, Hahn U. Pseudonymization of PHI Items in German Clinical Reports. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021;281:273-7.
  11. Zhao Y, Nasrullah Z, Li Z. PyOD: a python toolbox for scalable outlier detection. J Mach Learn Res. 2019;20:1-7.
  12. Van Roy V, Rossetti F, Perset K, Galindo-Romero L. AI Watch -National strategies on Artificial Intelligence: A European perspective. 2021 edition, EUR 30745 EN, . 2021.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seibert, K., Domhoff, D., Fürstenau, D., Biessmann, F., Schulte-Althoff, M., & Wolf-Ostermann, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Bremen (DE)
  • IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Berliner Hochschule für Technik (DE)
Corresponding author
Seibert, Kathrin
Venue
BMC Digital Health
Published
2023-05-04
Volume
1
Issue
1
ISSN
2731-684X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4367856437
Cited by
38
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • IT University Of Copenhagen (IT University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • German Ministry for Education and Research (16SV8508)
  • Universität Bremen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Social Policies and Healthcare Reform
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Keywords
artificial intelligence in nursing, nursing care, needs assessment, application scenarios, barriers and facilitators, staff shortage, informal care, nursing assistants, regulatory considerations, legal and ethical issues, data utilization, data standardization, participatory research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review