Cited by 3Education during COVID-19 pandemicDoctoral Education Challenges and SolutionsHigher Education Research Studies

Modifying Summer Undergraduate Research Programs during COVID-19 Increased Graduate School Intentions but Exacerbated Anxieties

Open access
Grineski, Sara E., Morales, Danielle X., Collins, Timothy W.·2023·CBE—Life Sciences Education

Abstract

Data collected from U.S. undergraduate researchers in STEM during Summer 2020 is used to examine how summer undergraduate research experience (SURE) 2020 program cancellations affected student well-being in specific domains. Students whose SUREs were canceled had reduced anxiety but greater concerns about graduate school matriculation than those in modified SUREs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1187/cbe.22-12-0243

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Grineski, S. E., Daniels, H. A., Collins, T. W., Morales, D. X., Frederick, A. H., & Garcia, M. (2018). The conundrum of social class: Disparities in publish- ing among STEM students in undergraduate research programs. Science Education, 102(2), 283-303.
  2. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Advanced diag- nostics for multiple regression (Online supplement to Multivariate Data Analysis). Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall Publishing. Retrieved May 15, 2023, from https://www.academia.edu/24541751/Advanced _Diagnostics_for_Multiple_Regression_A_Supplement_to_Multivariate _Data_Analysis_Multivariate_Data_Analysis
  3. Hernandez, P. R., Woodcock, A., Estrada, M., & Schultz, P. W. (2018). Under- graduate research experiences broaden diversity in the scientific work- force. Biosciene, 68(3), 204-211.
  4. Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., & Williams, J. B. W. (1999). Patient Health Question- naire Study Group. Validity and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ Primary Care Study. Journal of the American Med- ical Association, 282, 1737-1744.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grineski, S. E., Morales, D. X., & Collins, T. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Worcester State University (US)
Corresponding author
Grineski, Sara E.
Venue
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Published
2023-09
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
ar32-ar32
ISSN
1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381613288
Cited by
3
References
64
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CBE—Life Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, graduate school intentions, student anxiety, student well-being, undergraduate research participation
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Anxiety, Humans, Schools, Students, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review