The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Getting Under the Hood: How and for Whom Does Increasing Course Structure Work?
Open accessAbstract
At the college level, the effectiveness of active-learning interventions is typically measured at the broadest scales: the achievement or retention of all students in a course. Coarse-grained measures like these cannot inform instructors about an intervention's relative effectiveness for the different student populations in their classrooms or about the proximate factors responsible for the observed changes in student achievement. In this study, we disaggregate student data by racial/ethnic groups and first-generation status to identify whether a particular intervention-increased course structure-works better for particular populations of students. We also explore possible factors that may mediate the observed changes in student achievement. We found that a "moderate-structure" intervention increased course performance for all student populations, but worked disproportionately well for black students-halving the black-white achievement gap-and first-generation students-closing the achievement gap with continuing-generation students. We also found that students consistently reported completing the assigned readings more frequently, spending more time studying for class, and feeling an increased sense of community in the moderate-structure course. These changes imply that increased course structure improves student achievement at least partially through increasing student use of distributed learning and creating a more interdependent classroom community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“students in active-learning course designs that reduced or eliminated achievement gaps have reported an increased sense of community and self-efficacy compared to their peers in the lecture-intensive version of the same course (22, 23).”
From Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Disturbingly, data demonstrate that retention rates for first-generation college students in STEM are lower than those of continuing generation college students (Chen, 2013; Doerschuk et al., 2016) especially in key gatekeeping courses like General Biology and General Chemistry (Eddy & Hogan, 2014; Gregg-Jolly et al., 2016; Harackiewicz et al., 2014).”
From Exploring Organic Chemistry I students’ responses to an exam wrapper intervention. (2020) · cites this paper as Eddy & Hogan, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Auspiciously however, interventions involving student centered pedagogies have shown excellent promise in combating these trends (Crimmins, 2017; Eddy & Hogan, 2014; Haak, HilleRisLambers, Pitre, & Freeman, 2011).”
From Exploring Organic Chemistry I students’ responses to an exam wrapper intervention. (2020) · cites this paper as Eddy & Hogan, 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modern Applied Statistics with S
Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002) · Statisctics and computing/Statistics and computing · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 · Cited by 25,941
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111 · Cited by 9,787 · cited 2×
“This type of research is being referred to as second-generation education research (Eddy et al., 2013; Freeman et al., 2014) and will help refine and optimize active-learning interventions by identifying the critical elements that make an intervention effective.”
BackgroundSelf-citationOther people's children: cultural conflict in the classroom
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-6344 · Cited by 3,898
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612453266 · Cited by 3,138
Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom
Delpit, L. (1995) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/358724 · Cited by 2,502 · cited 1×
“Yet the different racial and ethnic groups that are included in the URM designation have very different cultures, histories, and exposure to college culture that could impact whether a particular classroom strategy is effective for them (Delpit, 2006).”
BackgroundA question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement.
Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82 · Cited by 2,163 · cited 1×
“Finally, feeling like they are part of a community increases both performance and motivation, especially for historically underrepresented groups (Walton and Cohen, 2007; Walton et al., 2012).”
BackgroundHurtado, S., & Carter, D. F. (1997) · Sociology of Education · doi:10.2307/2673270 · Cited by 1,938 · cited 1×
“…of our study, arguably as important as increased performance, because a sense of being part of a community (belonging) is crucial for retention (Hurtado and Carter, 1997; Hoffman et al., 2002) and has been 464 CBE—Life Sciences Education correlated with increased performance for…”
BackgroundStudent Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages*
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9 · Cited by 1,799 · cited 1×
“Thus, through increased engagement with the material (because of increased interest in it) student performance will increase (Carini et al., 2006).”
BackgroundAmbient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science
Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016239 · Cited by 1,372 · cited 1×
“When discussing reasons for leaving STEM, many students, particularly students of color and women, describe feelings of isolation and lack of belonging (Hewlett et al., 2008; Cheryan et al., 2009; Strayhorn, 2011).”
BackgroundStephens, N. M., Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R., Johnson, C. S., & Covarrubias, R. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027143 · Cited by 1,312
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Bodenhofer U, 2008, Mathware Soft Comput, 15, 5
- Borrego M, 2013, J Eng Educ, 102, 294
- Burchfield CM, 2000, Teach Psychol, 17, 58
- Dirks C, 2006, Cell Biol Educ, 5, 218
- Fassinger PA, 2000, J Class Inter, 35, 38
- Fox J, 2010, An R Companion to Applied Regression
- Handelsman J, 2007, Scientific Teaching
- Hewlett SA, 2008, The Athena Factor: Reversing the Brain Drain in Science. Engineering, and Technology
- Keeler CM, 1995, J Stats Educ, 3, 1
- Lee P, 2011, Harvard Kennedy School's Asian American Policy Review, 21, 19
- Minchella DJ, 2002, Am Biol Teach, 64, 352, 10.2307/4451310 · DOI
- National Science Foundation, 2013, Division of Undergraduate Education NSF, 13
- Poelzer GH, 2008, J Coll Sci Teach, 38, 59
- Sharma MD, 2005, Austral J Educ Tech, 21, 137
- Tsui L, 2002, J High Educ, 73, 740
- Tsui L, 2007, J Negro Educ, 76, 555
- van Wyk MM, 2012, J Soc Sci, 33, 261
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 553
Gavassa, S., Benabentos, R., Kravec, M. E., Collins, T., & Eddy, S. L. (2019) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.18-08-0153 · Cited by 38
“Specifically, we will describe these courses in terms of the increased structure format (Freeman et al. 2011; Eddy and Hogan, 2014).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationMead, C., Supriya, K., Zheng, Y., Anbar, A. D., Collins, J. P., LePore, P. C., & Brownell, S. E. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243916 · Cited by 39
“Reducing the contribution of exams toward final grades and providing frequent low-stakes assessments have been shown to reduce grade gaps in STEM courses [46, 75].”
BackgroundTeaching and research at a large university: Case studies of science professors
Robert, J., & Carlsen, W. S. (2017) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21392 · Cited by 40
Erickson, O. A., Cole, R. B., Isaacs, J. M., Álvarez-Clare, S., Arnold, J., Augustus‐Wallace, A., Ayoob, J. C., Berkowitz, A. R., Branchaw, J. L., Burgio, K. R., et al. (2022) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-05-0125 · Cited by 40
“Indeed, a growing body of research indicates how structure in the form of policies and procedures helps to ensure equitable engagement and success of all students regardless of their backgrounds or prior preparation (Balster et al., 2010; Eddy & Hogan, 2014; Hurtado et al., 2008; Tanner, 2013).”
BackgroundAmpofo, J., Bentum-Micah, G., Xusheng, Q., Sun, B., & Asumang, R. M. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1503258 · Cited by 36
“When teachers create an emotionally safe space through empathy, students are more willing to participate actively in discussions and collaborative activities (Eddy and Hogan, 2014).”
InfluentialThrough the Eyes of Faculty: Using Personas as a Tool for Learner-Centered Professional Development
Zagallo, P., McCourt, J. S., Idsardi, R., Smith, M. K., Urban‐Lurain, M., Andrews, T. C., Haudek, K. C., Knight, J., MERRILL, J. E., Nehm, R. H., et al. (2019) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-06-0114 · Cited by 38
“, 2017), and that evidence-based teaching can help close the opportunity gap (Freeman et al., 2011; Eddy and Hogan, 2014; Ballen et al., 2017).”
BackgroundPelch, M. A., & McCONNELL, D. A. (2016) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-016-0039-y · Cited by 36
“…supported by the development of research-validated teaching strategies that have been shown to improve student learning (Freeman et al. 2014; Handelsman et al. 2004; Kober 2015; Singer and Smith 2013) and reduce the achievement gap among student populations (Eddy and Hogan 2014; Haak et al. 2011).”
Hubbard, J. K., & Couch, B. A. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.008 · Cited by 35
“…studying to gaps in their understanding (Krumsvik & Ludvigsen, 2012; Ludvigsen et al., 2015), they often adopt surface-level study strategies resulting in a ‘feedback gap’ where students do not effectively utilize the feedback from in-class clicker questions (Evans, 2013; Ludvigsen et al., 2015).”
BackgroundStudent performance in and perceptions of a high structure undergraduate human anatomy course
Shaffer, J. F. (2016) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1608 · Cited by 39
Brazeal, K. R., & Couch, B. A. (2017) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1235 · Cited by 45
Meaders, C. L., Toth, E. S., Lane, A. K., Shuman, J. K., Couch, B. A., Stains, M., Stetzer, M. R., Vinson, E. L., & Smith, M. K. (2019) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-05-0084 · Cited by 37
“Furthermore, incorporating active learning in the classroom has been found to increase equitable outcomes for URM and first-generation students and decrease student failure rates (Stephens et al., 2012; Eddy and Hogan, 2014; Ballen et al., 2017; Gavassa et al., 2019).”
InfluentialBiosensors Show Promise as a Measure of Student Engagement in a Large Introductory Biology Course
McNeal, K. S., Zhong, M., Soltis, N., Doukopoulos, L., Johnson, E. T., Courtney, S. L., Alwan, A., & Porch, M. (2020) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-08-0158 · Cited by 35
“…Derting and Ebert-May, 2010; Deslauriers et al., 2011; Freeman et al., 2014), increased retention rates (Russell et al., 2007; Haak et al., 2011; Eddy and Hogan, 2014), and reductions in the achievement gap among student populations (Haak et al., 2011; Eddy and Hogan, 2014; Theobald et al.,…”
BackgroundInfluentialMiller, M., Castillo, G., Medoff, N. J., & Hardy, A. (2021) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-021-09551-z · Cited by 38
Group Random Call Can Positively Affect Student In-Class Clicker Discussions
Knight, J., Wise, S. B., & Sieke, S. (2016) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-02-0109 · Cited by 33
“There are additional benefits to using random call in the classroom: hearing from many different students, rather than just those who tend to volunteer, encourages all students to have a voice and respects the diversity of student thinking (Eddy and Hogan, 2014).”
BackgroundContext Determines Strategies for ‘Activating’ the Inclusive Classroom
Dewsbury, B. M. (2017) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.v18i3.1347 · Cited by 33
Toward “Inclusifying” the Underrepresented Minority in STEM Education Research
Bhatti, H. A. (2021) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.00202-21 · Cited by 40
Sandefur, C. I., & Gordy, C. L. (2016) · The journal of college science teaching · doi:10.2505/4/jcst16_045_04_52 · Cited by 33
“Furthermore, active learning in large classrooms is particularly beneficial to black and first-generation college student achievement (Eddy & Hogan, 2014), suggesting that implementation of active learning-based methodologies is exceptionally important at diverse, resource-limited institutions.”
BackgroundBeck, C. W., & Blumer, L. S. (2016) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-03-0139 · Cited by 33
“In addition, the specific context (community college, liberal arts college, regional university, or research university) and the student population (ethnicity, gender, educational experience, economic background, and family education level) may be very important (Kardash and Wallace, 2001; Eddy and Hogan, 2014).”
BackgroundImproving Exam Performance in Introductory Biology through the Use of Preclass Reading Guides
Lieu, R., Wong, A., Asefirad, A., & Shaffer, J. F. (2017) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-11-0320 · Cited by 37
“One way to do this is to hold students responsible for learning the course content before class—this is the basis of “flipped” courses (in which students acquire content before class and then perform active-learning exercises in class) or high-structure courses (in which students acquire content before class and then…”
BackgroundDiscovery Learning: Development of a Unique Active Learning Environment for Introductory Chemistry
Ott, L. E., Carpenter, T., Hamilton, D. S., & LaCourse, W. R. (2018) · Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.14434/josotl.v18i4.23112 · Cited by 38
“This observation is supported by other reports of increased course structure correlating to increased performance (Eddy & Hogan, 2014; Haak, et al., 2011).”
ResultStanton, J. D., Means, D. R., Babatola, O., Osondu, C., Oni, O., & Mekonnen, B. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-02-0049 · Cited by 32
“For example, Black students performed significantly better and perceived a biology course to be more useful when active-learning methods were used (Eddy and Hogan, 2014).”
BackgroundWhat Motivates Biology Instructors to Engage and Persist in Teaching Professional Development?
McCourt, J. S., Andrews, T. C., Knight, J., MERRILL, J. E., Nehm, R. H., Pelletreau, K. N., Prevost, L. B., Smith, M. K., Urban‐Lurain, M., & Lemons, P. P. (2017) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-08-0241 · Cited by 32
“…on March 23, 2018http://www.lifescied.org/Downloaded from http://www.lifescied.org/content/suppl/2017/08/14/16.3.ar54.DC1 Supplemental Material can be found at: 16:ar54, 2 CBE—Life Sciences Education • 16:ar54, Fall 2017 among underrepresented groups (Eddy and Hogan, 2014; Freeman et al., 2014).”
InfluentialAraghi, T., Busch, C. A., & Cooper, K. M. (2023) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.22-10-0199 · Cited by 33
“, 2006), persons excluded because of their ethnicity or race (Eddy and Hogan, 2014; Theobald et al., 2020), first-generation college-going students (Eddy and Hogan, 2014), and students who come from educationally or economically disadvantaged backgrounds (Haak et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialHowitz, W. J., Thane, T. A., Frey, T. L., Wang, X. S., Gonzales, J. C., Tretbar, C. A., Seith, D. D., Saluga, S. J., Lam, S., Nguyen, M. M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00895 · Cited by 33
Shafer, D., Mahmood, M. S., & Stelzer, T. (2021) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.17.010113 · Cited by 33
Ormand, C. J., Macdonald, R. H., Hodder, J., Bragg, D. D., Baer, E. M. D., & Eddy, P. L. (2021) · Journal of Geoscience Education · doi:10.1080/10899995.2021.1989980 · Cited by 32
Miller, E. R., Fairweather, J. S., Slakey, L. L., Smith, T. L., & King, T. M. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/u3dqy · Cited by 31
Salvatore, S., White, C., & Podowitz‐Thomas, S. (2024) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-024-00508-0 · Cited by 43
“This research points to the need for further “second-generation” STEM education research focused on how specific implementations of group work may impact neurodivergent student learning (Eddy & Hogan, 2014).”
BackgroundCastillo‐Montoya, M. (2016) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1273208 · Cited by 34
“Such findings align with research indicating more structured activities inside (Eddy and Hogan 2014) and outside of the classroom (Inkelas et al. 2007) support academic transitions and success of all students, but particularly FGCS.”
ResultCastillo‐Montoya, M., & Ives, J. (2021) · Journal of First-generation Student Success · doi:10.1080/26906015.2021.1890948 · Cited by 30
“Throughout these articles, scholars also recommended paying attention to within-group differences, such as race and major, and designing interventions for the specific population (Dika & D’Amico, 2016; Eddy & Hogan, 2014; Tibbetts et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMeta-analysis of Gender Performance Gaps in Undergraduate Natural Science Courses
Odom, S., Boso, H., Bowling, S., Brownell, S. E., Cotner, S. H., Creech, C., Drake, A. G., Eddy, S. L., Fagbodun, S., Hebert, S. L., et al. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-11-0260 · Cited by 31
“…et al., 2014), and it may offer disproportional benefits for other groups often underrepresented in STEM, such as underrepresented minority students (Eddy and Hogan, 2014; Ballen et al., 2017b; Casper et al., 2019; Theobald et al., 2020) and first-generation students (Eddy and Hogan, 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationMarbach‐Ad, G., Rietschel, C. H., Saluja, N., Carleton, K. L., & Haag, E. S. (2016) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.v17i3.1071 · Cited by 30
“It has also been documented that active learning strategies in higher education science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) classes best support underrepresented populations, in particular, African American students (9).”
Exploring Inequities in a Traditional and a Reformed General Chemistry Course
Tashiro, J., & Talanquer, V. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00821 · Cited by 31
Identifying systemic inequity in higher education and opportunities for improvement
Denaro, K., Dennin, K., Dennin, M. B., & Sato, B. K. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0264059 · Cited by 37
Aikens, M. L. (2020) · Bulletin of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/s11538-020-00739-6 · Cited by 32
“examination scores or course grades than their White peers (Greene et al. 2008; Eddy and Hogan 2014), and lower socioeconomic students underperform compared to middle/high socioeconomic students on more cognitively difficult examination questions”
BackgroundThe Room Itself is Not Enough: Student Engagement in Active Learning Classrooms
Metzger, K. J., & Langley, D. (2020) · College Teaching · doi:10.1080/87567555.2020.1768357 · Cited by 29
“Active learning strategies are associated with changes in student behaviors that correspond with increased academic success in the course (e.g., distributed studying), and attitudinal shifts in which students in active learning classes perceive their class as a community (Eddy and Hogan 2014).”
BackgroundResultDenaro, K., Sato, B. K., Harlow, A. N., Aebersold, A., & Verma, M. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-04-0077 · Cited by 30
“, 2019) as practices that improve learning for all students, particularly those from diverse backgrounds (Handelsman et al., 2004; Ong et al., 2011; Eddy and Hogan, 2014; Theobald et al., 2020).”
BackgroundEleazer, C. D., & Kelso, R. S. (2018) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1766 · Cited by 31
Unmasking Inequality: STEM Course Experience During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Means, B., & Neisler, J. (2020) · doi:10.51388/20.500.12265/102 · Cited by 29
Seven practical strategies to add active learning to a science lecture
Williams, A. E., & O’Dowd, D. K. (2020) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135317 · Cited by 27
“When a change in biology teaching is recommended, the teaching practices proposed are, broadly, increased structure [9], and increased active learning [10].”
BackgroundClement, L. (2016) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.v17i3.1077 · Cited by 27
“Many undergraduate science educators have been working on reducing the achievement gap of under-prepared students who come in to introductory biology courses at four-year institutions and have found, among other things, that the use of active learning and increased course structure could prevent URM attrition in STEM…”
BackgroundInfluentialNaibert, N., Geye, E., Phillips, M. M., & Barbera, J. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00399 · Cited by 27
How are undergraduate STEM instructors leveraging student thinking?
Gehrtz, J., Brantner, M., & Andrews, T. C. (2022) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-022-00336-0 · Cited by 33
“…of Georgia, 120 East Green St., Athens, GA 30602, USA Full list of author information is available at the end of the article conceptual learning and reduce achievement gaps (e.g., Eddy & Hogan, 2014; Freeman et al., 2014; Kogan & Laursen, 2014; Laursen et al., 2014; Theobald et al., 2020).”
BackgroundOrndorf, H. C., Waterman, M. A., Lange, D., Kavin, D., Johnston, S. C., & Jenkins, K. P. (2022) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-09-0239 · Cited by 26
“However, research suggests that evidence-based pedagogical practices may not serve all students equally well (Eddy and Hogan, 2014).”
BackgroundRoberts, J. A., Marshall, A. O., McLean, N. M., Baker, G. S., & Möller, A. (2018) · Journal of Geoscience Education · doi:10.1080/10899995.2018.1510235 · Cited by 26
“…(Derting & Ebert-May, 2010; Freeman et al., 2014; Freeman et al., 2011; Pollock & Finkelstein, 2008), class performance (Freeman et al., 2014), retention rates (S. H. Russell et al., 2007), and reduction in performance gaps among diverse student populations (Eddy & Hogan, 2014; Haak et al., 2011).”
BackgroundGraham, M., Jacobson, K., Husman, J. E., Prince, M., Finelli, C., Andrews, M., & Borrego, M. J. (2023) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2023.2196643 · Cited by 29
“These practices include incorporating increased structure (Eddy & Hogan, 2014; Wilton et al., 2019), guided peer-led team-based learning (Wamser, 2006), encouraging casual student-instructor interactions (Ballen et al., 2017), and promoting in-class near-peer student-student interactions (Stanich…”
BackgroundShaffer, J. F., Dang, J. V., Lee, A. K., Dacanay, S. J., Alam, U., Wong, H. Y., Richards, G. J., Kadandale, P., & Sato, B. K. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148051 · Cited by 27
Reading Quizzes Improve Exam Scores for Community College Students
Pape-Lindstrom, P., Eddy, S. L., & Freeman, S. (2018) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.17-08-0160 · Cited by 25
“disproportionately large benefits for underrepresented students (Haak et al., 2011; Hrabowski, 2011; Eddy and Hogan, 2014).”
Self-citationStieha, V., Earl, B., Hagens, H., Haynes, M., Ulappa, A. C., Bond, L., & Oxford, J. T. (2024) · AJP Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00247.2022 · Cited by 30
Corwin, L. A., Prunuske, A. J., & Seidel, S. B. (2018) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.17-07-0146 · Cited by 24
“Challenge: Equity and Participation Consider the last conference you attended: Did you hear differing opinions about your work or did the dominant paradigms prevail? Who asked questions; was it only high-status experts in the field? Did you hear from multiple voices? Did newer members, like graduate students and postd…”
BackgroundThe Flipped Classroom in a Terminal College Mathematics Course for Liberal Arts Students
Carter, C. L., Carter, R. L., & Foss, A. H. (2018) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/2332858418759266 · Cited by 30
“Concerning Eddy and Hogan’s (2014) second explanation of their results, the in-class problem sets developed for the flipped-classroom pedagogy in our study were designed to facilitate development of critical thinking skills.”
BackgroundInfluentialStudent perceptions of low-tech active learning and mastery of introductory biomechanics concepts
Knudson, D. V., & Wallace, B. (2019) · Sports Biomechanics · doi:10.1080/14763141.2019.1570322 · Cited by 24
“As active learning includes a wide variety of tools and exercises, it is important to examine which active learning tools may be most effective (Singer, Nielsen, & Schweingruber, 2012; Streveler & Meneske, 2017) and for what kinds of students (Eddy & Hogan, 2014).”
BackgroundCasey, J. R., Supriya, K., Shaked, S., Caram, J. R., Russell, A. A., & Courey, A. J. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c01253 · Cited by 26
A clicker-based case study that untangles student thinking about the processes in the central dogma
Pelletreau, K. N., Andrews, T. C., Armstrong, N. A., Bedell, M. A., Dastoor, F. P., Dean, N., Erster, S. H., Fata-Hartley, C. L., Guild, N. A., Greig, H. S., et al. (2016) · CourseSource · doi:10.24918/cs.2016.15 · Cited by 26
“The engagement of students using active learning techniques such as think-pair-share during clicker questions has been shown to increase student learning and decrease drop out rate (19), especially for underrepresented students (20).”
BackgroundShortlidge, E. E., Rain-Griffith, L., Shelby, C., Shusterman, G. P., & Barbera, J. (2019) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.17-12-0289 · Cited by 25
“Other research has demonstrated that outcomes from active learning can differ depending on a student’s gender or socioeconomic status (Haak et al., 2011; Eddy and Hogan, 2014; Eddy et al., 2014).”
BackgroundBuilding an Inclusive Classroom.
Penner, M. R. (2025) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · doi:10.17615/x2wj-8n38 · Cited by 24
Taggart, J., & Wheeler, L. B. (2023) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/14697874231193938 · Cited by 53
“This is not to suggest that instructors should provide students with a fully unstructured learning environment, which can be detrimental to learning, particularly for students traditionally underserved in higher education (Eddy & Hogan, 2014; Freeman et al., 2011; Haak et al., 2011).”
Teng, D., Wang, X., Xia, Y., Zhang, Y., Tang, L., Chen, Q., Zhang, R., Xie, S., & Yu, W. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13264-z · Cited by 30
“While some educators mitigate this burden by repurposing resources or sharing preparatory materials (Elliott et al., 2016; Hora & Ferrare, 2014), the effectiveness of interactive teaching remains closely tied to customizing content and activities to specific learning contexts (Eddy & Hogan, 2014).”
True Grit: Passion and persistence make an innovative course design work
Casper, A., Eddy, S. L., & Freeman, S. (2019) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000359 · Cited by 26
“Active learning increases social integration, particularly for underrepresented groups [2], and a sense of belonging is important for success in the sciences.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationMartella, A. M., Klahr, D., & Li, W. (2020) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000449 · Cited by 35
“For example, instructors may choose to (a) lecture on a topic before engaging students in activities (e.g., Eddy & Hogan, 2014), (b) provide students with these activities before they provide students with lecture (e.g., Kapur, 2014), (c) intersperse these activities throughout a lecture (e.g.,…”
The motivational system of task values and anticipated emotions in daily academic behavior
Umarji, O., McPartlan, P., Moeller, J., Li, Q., Shaffer, J. F., & Eccles, J. S. (2021) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-021-09898-y · Cited by 25
“The course was offered in an accelerated five-week period (as compared to the typical 10-week quarter), and was considered a “high structure” course, in which students were assigned deadlines for completing several different assignments each week (Eddy & Hogan, 2014; Lieu et al., 2017).”
BackgroundNarrowing Achievement Gaps in General Chemistry Courses with and without In-Class Active Learning
Clark, T. M. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00973 · Cited by 24
Student Demographics and the Impact of Team-Based Learning
Hettler, P. L. (2015) · International Advances in Economic Research · doi:10.1007/s11294-015-9539-7 · Cited by 23
A Call for Data-Driven Networks to Address Equity in the Context of Undergraduate Biology
Thompson, S. K., Hebert, S. L., Berk, S., Brunelli, R., Creech, C., Drake, A. G., Fagbodun, S., García‐Ojeda, M. E., Hall, C. L., Harshman, J. T., et al. (2020) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-05-0085 · Cited by 28
“For example, results from previous studies show certain active-learning strategies reduce or eliminate demographic gaps in performance (Haak et al. , 2011; Eddy and Hogan, 2014; Ballen et al. , 2017).”
Martín‐Alguacil, N., & Avedillo, L. (2024) · International Medical Education · doi:10.3390/ime3030026 · Cited by 22
Meeting the Conditions for Diffusion of Teaching Innovations in a University STEM Department
McConnell, M., Montplaisir, L. M., & Offerdahl, E. G. (2019) · Journal for STEM Education Research · doi:10.1007/s41979-019-00023-w · Cited by 21
Harlow, A. N., Lo, S. M., Saichaie, K., & Sato, B. K. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227633 · Cited by 26
Halmo, S. M., Sensibaugh, C. A., Reinhart, P. E., Stogniy, O., Fiorella, L., & Lemons, P. P. (2020) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-11-0260 · Cited by 21
“Since prominent studies like these, DBER has focused increasingly on second-generation instructional research, using findings from educational psychology to inform instructional design and testing these designs for certain topics and student populations (Eddy and Hogan, 2014; Freeman et al., 2014).”
BackgroundMethodFried, E., Martin, A. P., Esler, A., Tran, A., & Corwin, L. A. (2020) · Evolution Education and Outreach · doi:10.1186/s12052-020-00136-6 · Cited by 24
Bruns, H. A., Wisenden, B. D., Vanniasinkam, T., Taylor, R. T., Elliott, S., Sparks-Thissen, R. L., Justement, L. B., & Pandey, S. (2021) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2269 · Cited by 21
“The advantages of adopting such outcome-focused, student-centered approaches are numerous, including promoting equity in STEM education (37, 38).”
BackgroundMulti-institutional Study of Self-Efficacy within Flipped Chemistry Courses
Naibert, N., Duck, K. D., Phillips, M. M., & Barbera, J. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01361 · Cited by 22
York, A. M., Fink, A., Stoen, S. M., Walck-Shannon, E. M., Wally, C. M., Luo, J., Young, J. D., & Frey, R. F. (2021) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.17.020140 · Cited by 26
Jackson, J., Almos, H., Karibian, N., Lieb, C., Butts‐Wilmsmeyer, C. J., & Aranda, M. L. (2022) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.00233-21 · Cited by 24
“Through purposeful scaffolds of student needs, instructors can support their students’ development of time management strategies and create a more positive learning environment for students and potentially reduce stress levels for students with work and caretaking responsibilities (6, 31).”
BackgroundInfluentialBrame, C. J. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-814702-3.00004-4 · Cited by 21
Deri, M. A., Mills, P. A., & McGregor, D. (2018) · The journal of college science teaching · doi:10.2505/4/jcst18_047_03_68 · Cited by 21
The Inquiry-Oriented Instructional Measure
Kuster, G., Johnson, E., Rupnow, R. L., & Wilhelm, A. G. (2019) · International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s40753-019-00089-2 · Cited by 24
Diving into the Details: Constructing a Framework of Random Call Components
Waugh, A. H., & Andrews, T. C. (2020) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-07-0130 · Cited by 25
“Eddy and Hogan (2014) provide a strong model for carefully investigating the impact of instructional practices on different groups of students.”
Walck-Shannon, E. M., Cahill, M. J., McDaniel, M. A., & Frey, R. F. (2019) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.18-08-0163 · Cited by 21
Naibert, N., & Barbera, J. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00276 · Cited by 26
Building the lac Operon: A Guided-Inquiry Activity Using 3D-Printed Models
Gordy, C. L., Sandefur, C. I., Lacara, T., Harris, F. R., & Ramirez, M. V. (2020) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.v21i1.2091 · Cited by 20
“While numerous studies have shown the benefits of active learning over traditional lecture methods, more recent studies have demonstrated that these strategies are more impactful for certain underrepresented minority (URM) groups (8-11) .”
Thinking and Learning in Nested Systems: The Classroom Level
Talanquer, V., Cole, R. S., & Rushton, G. T. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00839 · Cited by 19
A Mixed-Methods Research Design to Advance Inclusive and Equitable Teaching
Soicher, R. N., Baker, A. R., & Thomas, R. C. (2024) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-024-09741-5 · Cited by 38
“…driven mostly by a significant increase in outcomes for the URM students in the study (Ballen et al., 2017), and • demonstrated a significant reduction in failure rates, an effect that was greatest for Black students and first‑generation college students (Eddy & Hogan, 2014; Freeman et al., 2011).”
BackgroundFostering Equitable Outcomes in Introductory Biology Courses through Use of a Dual Domain Pedagogy
Bauer, A. C., Coffield, V. M., Crater, D., Lyda, T., Segarra, V. A., Suh, K., Vigueira, C., & Vigueira, P. (2020) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-07-0134 · Cited by 20
“Likewise, Eddy and Hogan (2014) observed that Black students benefit more than Latin@ students from moderate-structure active-learning interventions in an introductory biology course.”
BackgroundInfluentialProfiles of Instructor Responses to Emergency Distance Learning
Rutherford, T. A., Karamarkovich, S. M., Xu, D., Tate, T. P., Sato, B. K., Baker, R. B., & Warschauer, M. (2021) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v25i1.2472 · Cited by 19
“…or active learning instruction improves academic outcomes for undergraduates (Deslauriers et al., 2011; Freeman et al., 2007; Freeman et al., 2014; PCACT, 2012), particularly for minoritized populations that often face greater challenges than their more privileged peers (Eddy & Hogan, 2014).”
BackgroundBur, S. K., Pomerantz, W. C. K., Bade, M. L., & Gee, C. T. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00028 · Cited by 20
Church, F. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11080370 · Cited by 23
El-Mansy, S. Y., Barbera, J., & Hartig, A. J. (2021) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/d1rp00276g · Cited by 19
Mulnix, A. B. (2016) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.15-12-0251 · Cited by 23
“Eddy and Hogan (2014) consider increased practice CBE—Life Sciences Education • 15:es8, Winter 2016 15:es8, 7 with material (Freeman et al., 2011) as a factor through which increased course structure achieves enhanced learning.”
BackgroundMarbach‐Ad, G., & Rietschel, C. H. (2016) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-06-0196 · Cited by 28
“Coupled with the science education literature documenting the ability of active learning to help underrepresented groups (Preszler, 2009; Haak et al., 2011; Eddy and Hogan, 2014), the instructors speculated that adding active learning to the traditional class might help underrepresented students.”
BackgroundCooper, K. M., Ding, L., Stephens, M. D., Michelene, T. H., & Brownell, S. E. (2018) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.17-12-0288 · Cited by 20
“, 2007) and decrease achievement gaps between students (Freeman et al., 2011; Eddy and Hogan, 2014).”
BackgroundAdkins-Jablonsky, S. J., Shaffer, J. F., Morris, J., England, B., & Raut, S. A. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-08-0187 · Cited by 30
“This course was considered a high-structure course, as students had graded preclass assignments, graded in-class work with extensive active-learning components, and graded weekly review quizzes (Eddy and Hogan, 2014; see Table 1 for all U2 pedagogical practices).”
BackgroundMethodWilton, M., Maloy, J. P., Beaster‐Jones, L., Sato, B. K., Lo, S. M., & Grunspan, D. Z. (2024) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.24-03-0102 · Cited by 19
“…been repeatedly demonstrated to promote student academic equity amongst a diversity of undergraduate students (Haak et al. , 2011; Stein-feld and Maisel, 2012; Eddy and Hogan, 2014; Freeman et al. , 2014; Ballen et al. , 2017; Gavassa et al. , 2019; McNair et al. , 2020; Theobald et al. , 2020).”
BackgroundDavidesco, I., & Milne, C. E. (2019) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.18-12-0240 · Cited by 18
“These assignments were hypothesized to help students distribute their learning throughout the semester and engage with content both before and after class (Eddy and Hogan, 2014).”
BackgroundEnhancing Diversity in College Science with Active Learning
Ballen, C. J. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33600-4_54 · Cited by 18
Howitz, W. J., Guaglianone, G., & King, S. M. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00809 · Cited by 20
Falconer, J. L. (2016) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.15387 · Cited by 21
Heuvelen, K. M. V., DAUB, G. W., Hawkins, L. N., Johnson, A. R., Ryswyk, H. V., & Vosburg, D. A. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00281 · Cited by 19
Chan, B. C., Baker, J. L., Bunagan, M. R., Ekanger, L. A., Gazley, J. L., Hunter, R. A., O’Connor, A. R., & Triano, R. M. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00731 · Cited by 18
Salehi, S., Berk, S., Brunelli, R., Cotner, S. H., Creech, C., Drake, A. G., Fagbodun, S., Hall, C. L., Hebert, S. L., Hewlett, J., et al. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-01-0012 · Cited by 20
“…describes many ways to promote inclusion in the classroom, such as employing equitable teaching strategies (Tanner, 2013) and active learning (Eddy and Hogan 2014; Ballen et al. 2017b; Casper et al. 2019; Theobald et al. 2019), learning names (Cooper et al., 2017), using humor (Cooper et…”
BackgroundCarmichael, M. C., Clair, C. S., Edwards, A., Barrett, P., McFerrin, H. E., Davenport, I. R., Awad, M., Kundu, A. K., & Ireland, S. K. (2016) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-01-0078 · Cited by 17
“In addition, several recent models, including the persistence model (Graham et al., 2013) and the whole student model (Freeman et al., 2011; Eddy and Hogan, 2014; Gross et al., 2015) offer theoretical frameworks for increasing STEM participation and success of URMs.”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Eddy, S. L., & Hogan, K. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hogan, Kelly A.
- Venue
- CBE—Life Sciences Education
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 453-468
- ISSN
- 1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4152207
- OpenAlex
- W2096648490
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 142.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- CBE—Life Sciences Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1118890, 0942215)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- course structure, active learning, academic performance, racial and ethnic disparities, first-generation college students, Black-White achievement gap, distributed learning, classroom community, student study time, higher education
- MeSH terms
- Behavior, Curriculum, Educational Measurement, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Perception, Regression Analysis, Students, Time Factors, Universities, Problem-Based Learning, Racial Groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review