The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PORTAAL: A Classroom Observation Tool Assessing Evidence-Based Teaching Practices for Active Learning in Large Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Classes
Open accessAbstract
There is extensive evidence that active learning works better than a completely passive lecture. Despite this evidence, adoption of these evidence-based teaching practices remains low. In this paper, we offer one tool to help faculty members implement active learning. This tool identifies 21 readily implemented elements that have been shown to increase student outcomes related to achievement, logic development, or other relevant learning goals with college-age students. Thus, this tool both clarifies the research-supported elements of best practices for instructor implementation of active learning in the classroom setting and measures instructors’ alignment with these practices. We describe how we reviewed the discipline-based education research literature to identify best practices in active learning for adult learners in the classroom and used these results to develop an observation tool (Practical Observation Rubric To Assess Active Learning, or PORTAAL) that documents the extent to which instructors incorporate these practices into their classrooms. We then use PORTAAL to explore the classroom practices of 25 introductory biology instructors who employ some form of active learning. Overall, PORTAAL documents how well aligned classrooms are with research-supported best practices for active learning and provides specific feedback and guidance to instructors to allow them to identify what they do well and what could be improved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Our data on type of active learning are also poorly resolved, because publications still routinely fail to report quantitative data on the nature of course interventions, such as records from classroom observation tools (e.g., ref. 61 and SI Appendix, Table S12).”
From Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math (2020) · cites this paper as [61]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111 · Cited by 9,787 · cited 3×
“For example, when asked to define active learning, faculty members in one study offered a range of answers, including simply “using clickers” or “group work” to “emphasizing higher-order skills” (Freeman et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationThe role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564 · cited 4×
“In addition to the amount of practice, the quality and distribution of the practice is also important (Ericsson et al., 1993).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCicchetti, D. V. (1994) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284 · Cited by 9,349 · cited 2×
“The resulting ICCs were all > 0.8, and thus all were in the “excellent” range (Supplemental Table 2; Cicchetti 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialForming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients.
McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.30 · Cited by 6,903 · cited 3×
“The resulting ICCs were all > 0.8, and thus all were in the “excellent” range (Supplemental Table 2; Cicchetti 1994).”
MethodInfluentialHake, R. R. (1998) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.18809 · Cited by 6,072 · cited 1×
“One of the most popular definitions of active learning comes from Hake (1998): “those [practices] designed at least in part to promote conceptual understanding through interactive engagement of students in heads-on (always) and hands-on (usually) activities which yield immediate feedback through…”
BackgroundDunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612453266 · Cited by 3,138
Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement.
Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.54.1.5 · Cited by 3,098
Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(77)80016-9 · Cited by 2,296 · cited 2×
“To provide students with opportunities to practice their logic development, it is necessary for instructors to formulate questions that require a higher level of thinking (PORTAAL element logic development 1, L1; Morris et al., 1977; Ericsson et al.,1993; Jensen et al., 2014).”
BackgroundMethodAronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1491 · Cited by 1,889 · cited 1×
“At the college level, an intervention that had students reflect on a situation in their own life in which hard work helped them improve also increased their achievement in their classes (Aronson et al., 2002).”
BackgroundPraise for intelligence can undermine children's motivation and performance.
Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33 · Cited by 1,709 · cited 1×
“Praise that focuses on effort encourages a mastery goal and can increase student willingness to participate in challenging tasks (R6; Mueller and Dweck, 1998).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
15 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Aggarwal P, 2008, J Market Educ, 30, 255, 10.1177/0273475308322283 · DOI
- American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2013, Describing and Measuring Undergraduate STEM Teaching Practices
- Bouwma-Gearhard J, 2012, Int J Teach Learn High Educ, 24, 180
- Bybee RW, 2006, The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins and Effectiveness
- Cole CC, 1982, Improving Instruction: Issues and Alternatives for Higher Education, AAHE-ERIC Higher Education Report no. 4
- Eichinger D, 1991, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, in Chicago, IL
- Elliot ES, 1988, J Pers Soc Psychol, 54, 5, 10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5 · DOI · Paper page
- Ellis K, 2000, Hum Commun Res, 26, 264
- 10.1187/cbe.06-09-0194 · DOI · Paper page
- Fritschner LM, 2000, J High Educ, 71, 342
- Henderson C, 2009, Phys Educ Res, 5, 1
- Hoekstra A, 2011, Learn Media Technol, 2011, 1
- Jensen JL, 2014, Educ Psychol Rev, 2014, 1
- Kane TJ, 2013, Ensuring Fair and Reliable Measures of Effective Teaching: Culminating Findings from the MET Project’s Three-Year Study
- National Science Foundation, 2013, Widening Implementation and Demonstration of Evidence-Based Reforms (WIDER), NSF 13–552 Program Solicitation
- President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, 2012, Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduate with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics
- Turpen C, 2009, Phys Rev Spec Top Phys Educ Res, 5, 1
- Turpen C, 2010, Phys Rev Spec Top Phys Educ Res, 6, 1
- Weimer M, 1990, Improving College Teaching: Strategies for Developing Instructional Effectiveness
- Wood E, 1994, Albta J Educ Res, 40, 57
- Wood E, 1999, J Educ Psychol, 91, 527, 10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.527 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–162 of 162
Blended teaching practices for active learning in higher pharmacy education
Liu, W., Gao, X., Han, L., Liu, J., & Feng, F. (2020) · Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-51141/v1 · Cited by 3
Student perspective of GTA strategies to reduce feelings of anxiousness with cold-calling
Doty, C. M., Geraets, A., Wan, T., Saitta, E. K. H., & Chini, J. J. (2020) · Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings · doi:10.1119/perc.2019.pr.doty · Cited by 3
“However, in the same studies, instructors were rarely observed to use error framing [1,13].”
BackgroundA Validated Novel Tool for Capturing Faculty-Student Joint Behaviors with the COPUS Instrument
Ludwig, P. M., & Prins, S. C. B. (2019) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.v20i3.1535 · Cited by 6
“This rubric seems very helpful for understanding the faculty perspective in the classroom but lacks the connection of student behaviors to instructor actions (17).”
BackgroundCBE—Life Sciences Education: the story of a “great journal scientists might be caught reading”
Dolan, E. L. (2018) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e18-06-0410 · Cited by 2
Ten Tweaks That Can Improve Your Teaching
Phelan, J. (2016) · The American history teacher · doi:10.1525/abt.2016.78.9.725 · Cited by 3
Baldock, B. L., & White, G. W. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00227 · Cited by 1
Perceptions of Active Learning among Faculty in Student-centered Universities
Aksoy, E. (2025) · Language Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.35207/later.1674855 · Cited by 2
Do course syllabi reflect observed teaching practices in undergraduate geoscience courses?
Czajka, C. D., Teasdale, R., Ryker, K. D., & Viskupic, K. M. (2025) · Journal of Geoscience Education · doi:10.1080/10899995.2025.2489922 · Cited by 2
“…(Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM; Smith et al., 2013), the PORTAAL (Practical Observation Rubric to Assess Active Learning; Eddy et al., 2015) and the RTOP (Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol; Sawada et al., 2000), each of which are summarized along with other…”
Supporting Higher Education Students Through Polls in Inclusive Digital Formats
Wells, M. B. (2024) · Social Education Research · doi:10.37256/ser.5120243858 · Cited by 2
“Eddy et al. (2015) identified several barriers to adoption, including clarity, the overwhelming number of aspects that must be considered, and the time required for implementation.”
BackgroundBarker, M. K. (2023) · Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.00191-22 · Cited by 2
“Within undergraduate STEM education alone, protocols include DART (6), RTOP (7), RIOT (8), PORTAAL (9), TA-IOP (10), and COPUS (11).”
BackgroundSuch, B. (2022) · Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher · doi:10.29333/mathsciteacher/12171 · Cited by 2
Eslinger, M. R., Alekseyev, S., & Schroeder, H. (2022) · Journal of College Science Teaching · doi:10.1080/0047231x.2022.12290583 · Cited by 2
Tordzro, G., Asamoah, E., & Ofori, K. N. (2021) · Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences · doi:10.9734/arjass/2021/v15i430270 · Cited by 2
Schussler, E., Reynolds, B., England, B. J., & Brigati, J. (2021) · Journal of College Science Teaching · doi:10.1080/0047231x.2021.12290551 · Cited by 2
“For example, an instructor who unknowingly asks more questions of students sitting on the middle-right side of the classroom may increase students’ apprehension and decrease the utility of that practice for those students (Cooper et al., 2018; Eddy et al., 2015; England et al., 2017).”
BackgroundFlipped Learning in Science Education: Implications and Challenges Yousef Alrashed,
Alrashed, Y., & Bin, I. A. (2021) · Psychology and Education Journal · doi:10.17762/pae.v58i1.1973 · Cited by 2
Quezada-Espinoza, M., Dominguez, A., Zavala, G., & Calder³n, J. F. (2020) · doi:10.18260/1-2--35237 · Cited by 2
“One example is the Practical Observation Rubric to Assess Active Learning [5].”
BackgroundOpen-Inquiry Course Design in the Public Policy Classroom
Pennock, A. (2020) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096520000475 · Cited by 4
Tracking learning engagement at the student level
Chen, J. C., Janzen, D. S., McGaughey, K., & Widmann, J. M. (2019) · Frontiers in Education Conference · doi:10.1109/fie43999.2019.9028617 · Cited by 2
“The PORTAAL (Practical Observation Rubric To Assess Active Learning) tool was designed based on a review of education research literature to identify best practices in active learning [8].”
MethodUsing Active Learning to Increase Student Retention in Introductory Computing Courses
Herring, B., & Jacques, R. S. (2019) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--33493 · Cited by 2
“Research giving students more opportunities to practice improves student learning (provided that the practice activities are related to tasks that the students are expected to perform)[5].”
BackgroundSeeing the Forest by Seeing the Trees: Using Student Surveys to Measure Instructional Practices
Laursen, S. L., & Archie, T. (2025) · Education sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15121712 · Cited by 1
“In recent years, many scholars have developed new instruments, especially classroom observation protocols (e.g., Eddy et al., 2015; Hora, 2015; Hora & Ferrare, 2013; M. K. Smith et al., 2013) and faculty surveys (e.g., Landrum et al., 2017; Walter et al., 2016), with the intent to probe instructor…”
Chamberlain, D., & Faulconer, E. K. (2025) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/14697874251385801 · Cited by 1
Making the first moves as a university teacher
Tomáška, Ľ. (2025) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/s44319-025-00600-8 · Cited by 1
Moran, M. J., Jean, K., Graham, B., Suchman, E., Popichak, K. A., McLean, J., & Mehaffy, C. (2025) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.00150-25 · Cited by 1
“Particularly in group work, other studies have shown that identities, including race and ethnicity, religion, nationality, political values, belonging to the LGBTQIA +community, and gender, may affect how students perceive active learning (77–80).”
Allen, Z. A., Zajic, C. J., Leckfor, C. M., Dolan, E. L., & Tuma, T. T. (2025) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.00167-25 · Cited by 1
“Existing classroom instruments useful for observing teaching practices are not designed to measure instructor humor (48–51).”
Active learning’s impact on student course performance in STEM varies by type and intensityPreprint
Xu, S.-M., Velasco, V., Hill, M. J., Tran, E. T., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E., Behling, S., Chambwe, N., Cintrón, D. L., Cooper, J. D., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.06.01.657285 · Cited by 1
Ryker, K. D., Teasdale, R., & Bitting, K. S. (2024) · Journal of Geoscience Education · doi:10.1080/10899995.2024.2358727 · Cited by 1
“They may also require time outside of the class period; for example, developers of the PORTAAL recommend that the class be videotaped and scored later for more reliable results (Eddy et al., 2015).”
InfluentialA Comparison of Chemistry Anxiety Between Online and In-Person Students
Faulconer, E. (2023) · Quarterly review of distance education · doi:10.1108/qrde-08-2023-0001 · Cited by 1
Use of Active Learning During Emergency Remote Teaching in COVID-19 Pandemic
Testa, G., Souza, M. B. D. O., Paes, Â. T., & Magdalon, J. (2023) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-023-01816-w · Cited by 2
“The perceived variation on how active learning was applied during classes was not unique to this study nor to the remote emergent teaching period [24, 28, 29].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialEsson, J., Wendel, P. J., Young, A. M., Frey, M. C., & Plank, K. M. (2022) · The journal of college science teaching · doi:10.1080/0047231x.2022.12315663 · Cited by 3
Active Learning Principles with Illustrations from Shakespeare Education
Mcpherson, J. (2020) · The Clearing House A Journal of Educational Strategies Issues and Ideas · doi:10.1080/00098655.2019.1705752 · Cited by 1
“Eddy, Converse, and Wenderoth (2015), who worked with STEM students, consider learning from failure a key element of active learning.”
BackgroundGarcía-Higuera, M. D. C., Chavez-Telleria, R., Alemán-Juárez, A., & García, I. (2019) · doi:10.18260/1-2--32948 · Cited by 1
“Furthermore, Eddy, Converse, and Wenderoth [8] discuss how these strategies developed to encourage active learning need to acknowledge the day-to-day life of faculty as well as potential barriers described in the literature, such as the limited effort to train faculty members on teaching methods.”
BackgroundIntroducing The Focus & Action of Students & Teachers Observation Protocol (FASTOP)
Kussmaul, C., Campbell, P. B., Torres-Demas, M., Mayfield, C., & Hu, H. H. (2024) · 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings · doi:10.18260/1-2--43856 · Cited by 1
Identifying Sources of Anxiety in an Introductory Online Undergraduate Chemistry Course
Faulconer, E., & Griffith, J. (2021) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-021-09937-w
Developing the FILL+ Tool to Reliably Classify Classroom Practices Using Lecture Recordings
Kinnear, G., Smith, S., Anderson, R., Gant, T., MacKay, J. R. D., Docherty, P., Rhind, S. M., & Galloway, R. (2021) · Journal for STEM Education Research · doi:10.1007/s41979-020-00047-7 · Cited by 8
“Each element is “supported by at least one published peer-reviewed article that demonstrates its impact on a relevant student outcome” (Eddy et al. 2015, p. 3).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialExamining Equitable, Student-Centered STEM Undergraduate Instruction Across Three U.S. Institutions
Orman, D. S. J. V., Hanley, D., Melton, J., & Gray, A. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16081346
“…the initial BIS Framework—drawing on research and existing frameworks for research-based and equity-centered practice (e.g., Beane et al., 2019; Eddy et al., 2015; Kober, 2015; Kuh, 2008; Labov et al., 2009; National Research Council [NRC], 2012; Sathy & Hogan, 2022; Sawada et al., 2002;…”
A Visualized Bibliometric Analysis of Educational Evaluation in Science Education
Zhu, D., Xiao, X., & Ren, Y. (2026) · International Conference on Education and Training Technologies (ICETT) · doi:10.1109/icett70124.2026.11666110
“In biology education, assessment tools appeared to play an important role in evaluating the effectiveness of three-dimensional learning reforms [25], while also assisting teachers in identifying strengths and areas for development in teaching practice [26].”
Online Teaching Practices in STEM in Higher Education During the Pandemic
Ponce, D., & Gonzalez, C. (2026) · Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education · doi:10.1007/s42330-026-00457-6
Designing a Peer Observation of Teaching Form: A Modified Delphi Study
Seitz, C. M., Thompson, M. P., Zwetsloot, J. J., Watford, M. A., Brown, M. E., Preaux, A., Tyson, J., Wu, S., Christiana, R. W., & Tarantino, C. (2026) · Pedagogy in health promotion · doi:10.1177/23733799261429471
Jackson, M. A., Liu, H., Moon, S., Doherty, J. H., & Wenderoth, M. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0327269
“Each of the 10 PORTAAL practices when used alone is documented in the literature to support student learning [41].”
InfluentialSelf-citationAgyei, C. A., Gyamfi, M., & Boafo, I. K. (2026) · European Journal of Health and Biology Education · doi:10.29333/ejhbe/18120
“Also, Eddy et al. (2015) observed that students perceive genetics as highly relevant when it is framed within societal and technological contexts.”
A Visualized Bibliometric Analysis of Educational Evaluation in Engineering Education
Xiao, X., Zhu, D., & Ren, Y. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale66047.2025.11346679
Usanga, O., Nkantah, M., & Ikpaha, S. (2025) · GLOBAL JOURNAL OF MODERN RESEARCH AND EMERGING TRENDS · doi:10.67487/gjmret.v1i7.130
“Wenderoth (2015) posit that hands-on learning brings laboratory tasks to classrooms and vice versa, where students are involved in using, testing materials and observing the working modules.”
A Multi-Modal Investigation of Instructional Practices in an Undergraduate Engineering Classroom
Farooq, U., Alani, O., Ali, S., Viruru, R., & Anwar, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Education Conference · doi:10.1109/fie63693.2025.11328572
“Most commonly, classroom observations [6], [7], [8] or retrospective surveys [9], [10], are used to evaluate instructional practices.”
Couillard, F., & Frey, C. (2025) · Cultural and Pedagogical Inquiry · doi:10.18733/cpi29752
Mapping the Evolution of Evidence-Based Teaching in Science Education: A Bibliometric Approach
Derman, I., & Bezen, S. (2025) · Uluslararası türk eğitim bilimleri dergisi · doi:10.46778/goputeb.1517854
Siddiqui, M., Mahmud, S. A., Kobra, K., Suba, N. S., & Yolid, M. M. (2024) · Social Science and Humanities Journal · doi:10.18535/sshj.v8i12.1494
Classroom Activity Detection from Audio-Text Information Fusion
Cui, Y., Wei, Z., Xu, W. M., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (BDAI) · doi:10.1109/bdai62182.2024.10692465
Impact of the use of active methodology on the performance of undergraduate radiology students.
Lopes, R. D. A., Kubrusly, M., da Silva, S. F. R., & Rocha, H. A. L. (2024) · Current problems in diagnostic radiology · doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.05.008
Speaking of Organic Chemistry: A Faculty Metaphor Analysis in Organic Chemistry Education
Francom, E. R., & Saitta, E. K. H. (2024) · College Teaching · doi:10.1080/87567555.2024.2343488
“…et al. 2015), Finally, providing students with an in-class practice that is similar in rigor to course exams appears to improve student achievement (Eddy, Converse, and Wenderoth 2015; Jensen et al. 2014), and it would speak to Instructor 1’s worry of students that do minimal practice on their own…”
Assessing Community College Biology Student Perceptions of Being Called on in Class
Alvares, S. M., Shlichta, J. G., McFarland, J., & Theobald, E. J. (2023) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.23-05-0068
“Random call (RC) is a specific practice of calling on individual students who have not volunteered (Eddy et al., 2015; Hood et al., 2021).”
BackgroundResultPhysics Graduate Teaching Assistant Use of Error Framing in Recitations and Laboratories
Sharkey, D., Doty, C. M., Wan, T., Saitta, E. K. H., & Chini, J. J. (2023) · Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings · doi:10.1119/perc.2023.pr.sharkey
“Error framing can occur when an instructor is engaged with a student or as part of the introduction to an activity [6].”
BackgroundCen, X., Lee, R. J., Contreras, C., Owens, M. T., & Maloy, J. (2023) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.09.01.506238
Mobile Applications to Measure Students’ Engagement in Learning
Chen, J., Janzen, D. S., Chang, R., McGaughey, K., & Widmann, J. M. (2022) · CoED · doi:10.18260/af7d-84-10966
Pfeifer, M. A., Cordero, J. J., & Stanton, J. (2021) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.12.08.471414
“Yet defining the critical components of a particular active-learning practice is often not straightforward (Eddy et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAn Analysis System of Classroom Interaction in Higher Education Based on PORTAAL
Dai, Z.-C., Wang, C.-R., & Sun, C. (2021) · International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale52509.2021.9678560
“Practical Observation Rubric to Assess Active Learning (pORTAAL) was used to evaluate the promoting effect of teacher behavior on students' active learning in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) classroom in higher education [12].”
MethodBreakout Rooms, Polling, and Chat, Oh My! The Development and Validation of Online COPUSPreprint
Pusey, T. S., Valencia, A. P., Signorini, A., & Kranzfelder, P. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.07.21.453286
“113 Classroom observation protocols 114 An array of tools have been developed over the past two decades to measure active 115 teaching pedagogies, especially in STEM courses (Eddy et al., 2015; Owens et al., 2017; Sawada 116 et al., 2002; Smith et al., 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialScoping Review of Flipped Learning in Engineering Education Abeer Rasheed
Rasheed, A. (2021) · Psychology and Education Journal · doi:10.17762/pae.v58i1.1974
Impact of Prior Experiences on Future Participation in Active Learning
DeMonbrun, R., & Finelli, C. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--30604
Assessing Teaching to Empower Learning
Haave, N. C. (2017) · doi:10.22329/celt.v10i0.4910
Wu, S. P. W., & Rau, M. (2017) · International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.22318/cscl2017.39
“Active learning in STEM instruction Recent evidence for the effectiveness of active learning interventions has instigated widespread interest in implementing active learning in STEM courses, instead of passive lectures (Eddy et al., 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialAlvi, I. (2021) · Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities · doi:10.21659/rupkatha.v13n2.50
Chan-Hilton, A. (2019) · doi:10.18260/1-2--32438
“In engineering education, additional data from instruction observation on active learning and student-center practices can be used, such as Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS) (Smith et al., 2013), Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) (Piburn et al., 2000), Teaching Dimensions Observ…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Eddy, S. L., Converse, M., & Wenderoth, M. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eddy, Sarah L.
- Venue
- CBE—Life Sciences Education
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- ar23
- ISSN
- 1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4477739
- OpenAlex
- W2307728084
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 70.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- CBE—Life Sciences Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1118890)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Keywords
- active learning, evidence-based teaching practices, classroom observation tools, instructor feedback, adult learners, discipline-based education research
- MeSH terms
- Engineering, Humans, Logic, Mathematics, Science, Students, Teaching, Technology, Universities, Reproducibility of Results, Program Development, Problem-Based Learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review