Cited by 550Education, Achievement, and GiftednessCareer Development and DiversityCritical Race Theory in Education

STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes

Open access
Canning, Elizabeth A., Muenks, Katherine, Green, Dorainne J., Murphy, Mary C.·2019·Science Advances

Abstract

Racial achievement gaps are twice as large, and all students are less motivated, when STEM faculty believe ability is fixed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.aau4734

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Change will be most beneficial if faculty and administrators believe that underrepresented students are capable of being successful and make a strong commitment to quality in teaching.

    “we caution that change will be most beneficial if faculty and administrators believe that underrepresented students are capable of being successful (44) and make a strong commitment to quality in teaching.”

    From Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math (2020) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) link faculty growth-mindset beliefs with smaller racial achievement gaps and suggest that faculty mindset interventions could benefit underrepresented students. The paper studies faculty, not administrators, and does not establish that a change will be most beneficial under the stated condition. The separate commitment-to-teaching clause is not attached to this citation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Larger achievement gaps are correlated with faculty who have a fixed mindset, which interprets intelligence as innate and immutable and is therefore exclusion or selection-oriented.

    “larger gaps are correlated with faculty who have a fixed mindset, which interprets intelligence as innate and immutable and is therefore exclusion or selection-oriented (44).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

11 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [8]C. S. Dweck, Self-theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development (Psychology Press, 1999).
  2. [19]D. M. Bates, Lme4: Mixed-Effects Modeling With R (Springer, 2010).
  3. [32]D. M. Steele, B. Cohn-Vargas, Identity Safe Classrooms: Places to Belong and Learn (Corwin Press, ed. 1, 2013).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Canning, E. A., Muenks, K., Green, D. J., & Murphy, M. C.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
  • Canning, Elizabeth A.
  • Murphy, Mary C.
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2019-02
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
eaau4734-eaau4734
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913734454
Cited by
550
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 27
FWCI
72.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks Open (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (DRL-1450755, HRD-1661004)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
Keywords
fixed mindset, growth mindset, faculty beliefs, racial achievement gap, underrepresented minority students, student motivation, STEM education, course evaluation, academic performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review