Cited by 63Cancer survivorship and careSleep and related disordersIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

Walking improves sleep in individuals with cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials

Chiu, Hsiao-Yean, Huang, Hui-Chuan, Chen, Pin-Yuan, Hou, Wen-Hsuan, Tsai, Pei-Shan·2015·Oncology Nursing Forum

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of walking exercise on sleep in people with cancer. DATA SOURCES: Databases searched included China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, CINAHL®, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PsycINFO®, PubMed, Wanfang Data, and Web of Science. DATA SYNTHESIS: Nine randomized, controlled trials involving 599 patients were included. Most of the studies used moderate-intensity walking exercise. Overall, walking exercise significantly improved sleep in people with cancer (Hedges' g = –0.52). Moderator analyses showed that walking exercise alone and walking exercise combined with other forms of interventions yielded comparable effects on sleep improvement, and that the effect size did not differ among participants who were at different stages of cancer. The effect sizes for studies involving individuals with breast cancer and for studies including individuals with other types of cancer were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-intensity walking exercise is effective in improving sleep in individuals with cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The authors' findings support the inclusion of walking exercise into the multimodal approaches to managing sleep in people with cancer. Healthcare providers must convey the benefits of walking exercise to individuals with cancer who are suffering from sleep problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1188/15.onf.e54-e62

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chiu, H.-Y., Huang, H.-C., Chen, P.-Y., Hou, W.-H., & Tsai, P.-S.
Affiliations
  • Taipei Medical University (TW)
  • Cardinal Tien College of Healthcare and Management (TW)
  • Chang Gung University (TW)
Venue
Oncology Nursing Forum
Published
2015-02-28
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
E54-E62
ISSN
  • 0190-535X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-0688
OpenAlex
W284536905
Cited by
63
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oncology nursing forum (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Keywords
walking exercise, sleep quality, cancer patients, sleep disorders, moderate-intensity exercise, breast cancer, exercise therapy
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Walking, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review