Cited by 282Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Behavioural activation for depression

Open access
Veale, David·2008·Advances in Psychiatric Treatment

Abstract

A formal therapy for depression, behavioural activation focuses on activity scheduling to encourage patients to approach activities that they are avoiding and on analysing the function of cognitive processes (e.g. rumination) that serve as a form of avoidance. Patients are thus refocused on their goals and valued directions in life. The main advantage of behavioural activation over traditional cognitive–behavioural therapy for depression is that it may be easier to train staff in it and it can be used in both in-patient and out-patient settings. This article describes the theory and rationale of behavioural activation, its evidence base and how to develop a formulation that guides the strategy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/apt.bp.107.004051

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Addis, 2004, Overcoming Depression One Step at a Time
  2. 2004, Depression: Management of Depression in Primary and Secondary Care
  3. Veale D. (2008) In debate: Layard's proposals for 10 000 more therapists in new psychological treatment centres trades on a naively mechanistic concept of ‘mental illness’ and would be counterproductive across society. British Journal of Psychiatry, in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Veale, D.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Veale, David
Venue
Advances in Psychiatric Treatment
Published
2008-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
29-36
ISSN
  • 1355-5146 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1481
OpenAlex
W2126250087
Cited by
282
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
behavioral activation, depression, activity scheduling, rumination, avoidance, cognitive processes, treatment formulation, cognitive behavioral therapy, employee training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review