Cited by 291Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Detached Mindfulness In Cognitive Therapy: A Metacognitive Analysis And Ten Techniques

Wells, Adrian·2005·Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10942-005-0018-6

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wells, A.
Venue
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
Published
2005-12
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
337-355
ISSN
0894-9085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130444049
Cited by
291
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
detached mindfulness, metacognition, metacognitive therapy, emotional disorders, metacognitive monitoring, metacognitive regulation, decentering, attentional flexibility, conceptual processing, mindfulness practice, cognitive restructuring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review