Cited by 256Schizophrenia research and treatmentSexual function and dysfunction studiesSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Sexual dysfunction in patients taking conventional antipsychotic medication

Open access
Smith, Shubulade, O'Keane, Veronica, Murray, Robin·2002·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Antipsychotic drugs are associated with sexual dysfunction but the mechanisms are poorly understood. Aims: To ascertain the frequency of sexual dysfunction in patients taking conventional antipsychotics and to determine the possible underlying mechanisms. Method: Sexual dysfunction was assessed in 101 patients receiving conventional antipsychotic medication, 57 normal controls and 55 controls attending a sexual dysfunction clinic. Results: Sexual dysfunction occurred in 45% of patients taking antipsychotic medication, 17% of normal controls and 61% of controls attending a sexual dysfunction clinic. Sexual dysfunction was associated with autonomic side-effects in normoprolactinaemic males, but the presence of hyperprolactinaemia overrode other causes of sexual dysfunction. For women, hyperprolactinaemia was the main cause of sexual dysfunction. Conclusions: Conventional antipsychotic medications cause significant levels of sexual dysfunction. Clinicians should routinely enquire about sexual symptoms prior to the prescription of antipsychotics and on follow-up.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.181.1.49

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, S., O'Keane, V., & Murray, R.
Corresponding author
Smith, Shubulade
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2002-07
Volume
181
Issue
1
Pages
49-55
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2166392515
Cited by
256
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
sexual dysfunction, typical antipsychotics, hyperprolactinemia, prolactin, antipsychotic adverse effects, women, men
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Hyperprolactinemia, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Antipsychotic Agents, Case-Control Studies, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review