Cited by 440Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Transference-focused psychotherapy v. treatment by community psychotherapists for borderline personality disorder: randomised controlled trial

Open access
Doering, Stephan, Hörz, Susanne, Rentrop, Michael, Fischer-Kern, Melitta, Schuster, Peter, Benecke, Cord, Buchheim, Anna, Martius, Philipp +1 more·2010·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Transference-focused psychotherapy is a manualised treatment for borderline personality disorder. Aims: To compare transference-focused psychotherapy with treatment by experienced community psychotherapists. Method: In a randomised controlled trial (NCT00714311) 104 female out-patients were treated for 1 year with either transference-focused psychotherapy or by an experienced community psychotherapist. Results: Significantly fewer participants dropped out of the transference-focused psychotherapy group (38.5% v. 67.3%) and also significantly fewer attempted suicide (d = 0.8, P = 0.009). Transference-focused psychotherapy was significantly superior in the domains of borderline symptomatology (d = 1.6, P = 0.001), psychosocial functioning (d = 1.0, P = 0.002), personality organisation (d = 1.0, P = 0.001) and psychiatric in-patient admissions (d = 0.5, P = 0.001). Both groups improved significantly in the domains of depression and anxiety and the transference-focused psychotherapy group in general psychopathology, all without significant group differences (d = 0.3–0.5). Self-harming behaviour did not change in either group. Conclusions: Transference-focused psychotherapy is more efficacious than treatment by experienced community psychotherapists in the domains of borderline symptomatology, psychosocial functioning, and personality organisation. Moreover, there is preliminary evidence for a superiority in the reduction of suicidality and need for psychiatric in-patient treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.070177

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a clear trend towards new kinds of control conditions such as CTBE or guideline-oriented treatments.

    “There is a clear trend towards new kinds of control conditions such as CTBE (Linehan 2006; Doering 2010) or guideline-oriented treatments (Bateman 2009;McMain 2009).”

    From Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. (2012) · cites this paper as Doering 2010

  • Random sequence generation in Doering 2010 was at low risk of selection bias; random numbers were used, with matching after inclusion of the 35th patient according to severity of self-harming behaviour during the last year and personality organisation.

    “Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Use of random numbers, matching after inclusion of 35th patient according to severity of self-harming behaviour during the last year and personality organisation (Doering 2010, personal communication.”

    From Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. (2012) · cites this paper as Doering 2010

  • Allocation concealment in Doering 2010 was at low risk of selection bias; results of first assessments were sent to a researcher outside the two study centers who performed the randomization.

    “Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk “The results of the first assessments [screening for inclusion criteria] were sent to a researcher outside the two study centers who performed the randomization.”(Doering 2010, p. 5)”

    From Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. (2012) · cites this paper as Doering 2010

  • Doering 2010 found no statistically significant difference between treatment and control in any self-harming behaviour.

    “or any self-harming behaviour (RR 1.09; N = 104, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.40; Analysis 1.9)”

    From Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. (2012) · cites this paper as Doering 2010

  • Blinding of outcome assessment in Doering 2010 was at low risk of detection bias; research assistants who conducted assessments before randomization and after one year of treatment were blinded.

    “Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Low risk “Research assistants who conducted assessments before randomization and after one year of treatment were blinded for the”

    From Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. (2012) · cites this paper as Doering 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doering, S., Hörz, S., Rentrop, M., Fischer-Kern, M., Schuster, P., Benecke, C., Buchheim, A., Martius, P., & Buchheim, P.
Affiliations
  • Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Corresponding author
Doering, Stephan
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2010-05
Volume
196
Issue
5
Pages
389-395
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2165687185
Cited by
440
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 34
FWCI
36.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Oesterreichische Nationalbank (10636)
  • Technische Universität München
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
transference-focused psychotherapy, borderline personality disorder, psychotherapy efficacy, suicidality, psychosocial functioning, treatment discontinuation, self-harm
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Combined Modality Therapy, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Psychotropic Drugs, Transference, Psychology, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review