Cited by 124Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyMental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Recovery in borderline personality disorder (BPD): a qualitative study of service users' perspectives

Open access
Katsakou, Christina, Marougka, Stamatina, Barnicot, Kirsten, Savill, Mark, White, Hayley, Lockwood, Kate, Priebe, Stefan·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Symptom improvement in Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is more common than previously hypothesised. However, it remains unclear whether it reflects service users' personal goals of recovery. The present study aimed to explore what service users with BPD view as recovery. METHODS: 48 service users were recruited from secondary mental health services and their views on their personal goals and the meaning of recovery were explored in in-depth semi-structured interviews. The study drew on grounded theory and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Service users believed that recovery involved developing self-acceptance and self-confidence, gaining control over emotions, improving relationships, employment, and making progress in symptoms like suicidality and self-harming. They felt that psychotherapies for BPD often had an extreme focus on specific areas, like self-harming or relationships, and that some of their goals were neglected. Although full recovery was seen as a distant goal, interviewees felt that they could learn how to deal with their problems in more effective ways and make meaningful progress in their lives. CONCLUSIONS: Specialist therapies for BPD explicitly address some of the recovery goals that are important to service users, whereas other goals are only indirectly or poorly addressed. Professionals might need to work with service users towards devising comprehensive individualised case formulations, including all treatment targets that are important to service users, their priorities, and long-term plans on how their targets might be met and which services might be involved.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0036517

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]Gunderson JG 1984 Borderline Personality Disorder Washington DC American Psychiatric Press
  2. [37]Gilbert P 2010 Compassion-focused Therapy: Distinctive Features (CBT Distinctive Features) Hove Routledge
  3. [38]Turner K Neffgen M Gillard S 2011 Understanding personality disorders and recovery London Emergence PMC4521354 26227023

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Katsakou, C., Marougka, S., Barnicot, K., Savill, M., White, H., Lockwood, K., & Priebe, S.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • East London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Katsakou, Christina
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-05-17
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
e36517
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974626200
Cited by
124
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (DRF-2009-02-11, PB-PG-0906-10540)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, recovery, service user perspectives, personal goals, self-acceptance, self-confidence, emotion regulation, relationships, employment, suicidality, self-harm, case formulation, personalized treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review