Cited by 63Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesBehavioral Health and InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

An exploratory randomised trial of a simple, brief psychological intervention to reduce subsequent suicidal ideation and behaviour in patients admitted to hospital for self-harm.

Open access
Armitage, Christopher J., Rahim, Wirda Abdul, Rowe, Richard, O'Connor, Rory C.·2016·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implementation intentions link triggers for self-harm with coping skills and appear to create an automatic tendency to invoke coping responses when faced with a triggering situation. AIMS: To test the effectiveness of implementation intentions in reducing suicidal ideation and behaviour in a high-risk group. METHOD: Two hundred and twenty-six patients who had self-harmed were randomised to: (a) forming implementation intentions with a 'volitional help sheet'; (b) self-generating implementation intentions without help; or (c) thinking about triggers and coping, but not forming implementation intentions. We measured self-reported suicidal ideation and behaviour, threats of suicide and likelihood of future suicide attempt at baseline and then again at the 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: All suicide-related outcome measures were significantly lower at follow-up among patients forming implementation intentions compared with those in the control condition (ds>0.35). The volitional help sheet resulted in fewer suicide threats (d = 0.59) and lowered the likelihood of future suicide attempts (d = 0.29) compared with patients who self-generated implementation intentions. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation intention-based interventions, particularly when supported by a volitional help sheet, show promise in reducing future suicidal ideation and behaviour.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.162495

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armitage, C. J., Rahim, W. A., Rowe, R., & O'Connor, R. C.
Affiliations
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Armitage, Christopher J.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2016-05
Volume
208
Issue
5
Pages
470-476
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2238667578
Cited by
63
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
9.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
implementation intentions, self-harm, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, suicide prevention, psychological intervention, coping strategies, hospitalized patients
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Brief, Suicide, Attempted, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Intention, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review