Cited by 194Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Psychological processes and repeat suicidal behavior: a four-year prospective study

Open access
O'Connor, Rory C., Smyth, Roger, Ferguson, Eamonn, Ryan, Caoimhe, Williams, J. Mark G.·2013·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although suicidal behavior is a major public health concern, understanding of individually sensitive suicide risk mechanisms is limited. In this study, the authors investigated, for the first time, the utility of defeat and entrapment in predicting repeat suicidal behavior in a sample of suicide attempters. METHOD: Seventy patients hospitalized after a suicide attempt completed a range of clinical and psychological measures (depression, hopelessness, suicidal ideation, defeat, and entrapment) while in hospital. Four years later, a nationally linked database was used to determine who had been hospitalized again after a suicide attempt. RESULTS: Over 4 years, 24.6% of linked participants were readmitted to hospital after a suicidal attempt. In univariate logistic regression analyses, defeat and entrapment as well as depression, hopelessness, past suicide attempts, and suicidal ideation all predicted suicidal behavior over this interval. However, in the multivariate analysis, entrapment and past frequency of suicide attempts were the only significant predictors of suicidal behavior. CONCLUSIONS: This longitudinal study supports the utility of a new theoretical model in the prediction of suicidal behavior. Individually sensitive suicide risk processes like entrapment could usefully be targeted in treatment interventions to reduce the risk of repeat suicidal behavior in those who have been previously hospitalized after a suicide attempt.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0033751

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In one study, entrapment and past suicide attempts were the only multivariate predictors of readmission to hospital for self-harm at 4-year follow-up, even when controlling for depressive symptoms and hopelessness.

    “finding in one study that entrapment and past suicide attempts were the only multivariate predictors of readmission to hospital for self-harm at 4-year follow-up, even when controlling for depressive symptoms and hopelessness [67]”

    From The integrated motivational–volitional model of suicidal behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as [67]

    The Results, ‘Individual and Multivariate Predictors of Suicide Attempts Between Time 1 and Time 2’ (page not provided), identify entrapment and frequency of previous suicide attempts as the only predictors in the final model, which included depression and hopelessness. But the modeled outcome was a repeat suicide attempt, not every hospital readmission for self-harm: the Results, ‘Repeat Suicide Attempt During Follow-Up’ (page not provided), report 20 such readmissions, of which 15 were classified as suicide attempts. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There has been support for the main facets of the IMV model.

    “There has been support for the main facets of the IMV model (e.g., Dhingra et al., 2016; O'Connor et al., 2013; Wetherall et al., 2018)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Williams J. M. G. (1997). The cry of pain. London, United Kingdom: Penguin

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Connor, R. C., Smyth, R., Ferguson, E., Ryan, C., & Williams, J. M. G.
Affiliations
  • Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2013-12
Volume
81
Issue
6
Pages
1137-1143
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W1978628774
Cited by
194
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2
FWCI
17.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Chief Scientist Office (CZH/4/449)
  • Wellcome Trust (GRO67797)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
suicide attempts, entrapment, defeat, suicide risk prediction, hospital readmission, depression, hopelessness, suicidal ideation, suicide prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Culture, Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Internal-External Control, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Patient Readmission, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Scotland, Suicide, Attempted, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation, Hope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review