Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of low density lipoprotein receptor ligand interactions by fluorescence resonance energy transfer

Yamamoto, Taichi, Lamoureux, Johanne, Ryan, Robert O.·2006·Journal of Lipid Research

Abstract

The low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) is the prototype of a family of cell surface receptors involved in a wide range of biological processes. A soluble low density lipoprotein receptor (sLDLR) and a tryptophan (Trp)-deficient variant human apolipoprotein E3 (apoE3) N-terminal domain (NT) were used in binding studies. The sole cysteine in apoE3-NT was covalently modified with an extrinsic fluorescence probe, N-(iodoacetyl)-N'-(5-sulfo-1-napthyl)ethylenediamine (AEDANS), and the protein was complexed with lipid. Incubation of sLDLR with AEDANS-Trp-null apoE3-NT dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) disks, but not lipid-free AEDANS-apoE, induced an enhancement in AEDANS fluorescence emission intensity (excitation, 280 nm) consistent with intermolecular energy transfer from excited Trp in sLDLR to receptor-bound apoE. Ligand binding to sLDLR required calcium and was saturable. In competition binding assays, unlabeled apoE3-NT DMPC inhibited AEDANS-apoE DMPC binding to sLDLR more effectively than low density lipoprotein. Fluorescence changes in this system reflected pH-dependent ligand binding and release from sLDLR consistent with models derived from the X-ray crystal structure of the receptor at endosomal pH. Intermolecular energy transfer from excited Trp in LDLR family members to fluorescently tagged ligands represents a sensitive and convenient assay for the characterization of the myriad molecular interactions ascribed to this family of receptor.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1194/jlr.d600001-jlr200

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The EGF-like and YWTD repeats are thought to allow proper positioning of the ligand binding domain and have been shown to promote release of cargo in the endosome in a pH-dependent manner.

    “These repeats are thought to both allow proper positioning of the ligand binding domain and have been shown to promote the release of cargo in the endosome in a pH-dependent manner80.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Nykjaer, 2002, The low-density lipoprotein receptor gene family: a cellular Swiss army knife?, Trends Cell Biol., 12, 273, 10.1016/S0962-8924(02)02282-1 · DOI
  2. Schneider, 2003, LDL receptor relatives at the crossroad of endocytosis and signaling, Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 60, 892, 10.1007/s00018-003-2183-Z · DOI
  3. Goldstein, 1983, Receptor-mediated endocytosis of low-density lipoprotein in cultured cells, Methods Enzymol., 98, 241, 10.1016/0076-6879(83)98152-1 · DOI
  4. Bajari, 2005, LDL receptor family: isolation, production, and ligand binding analysis, Methods., 36, 109, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2004.11.007 · DOI
  5. Fisher, 2000, The lipid associated conformation of the receptor binding domain of human apolipoprotein E, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 33601, 10.1074/jbc.M002643200 · DOI
  6. Fisher, 1997, Bacterial overexpression, isotope enrichment and NMR analysis of the N-terminal domain of human apolipoprotein E, Biochem. Cell Biol., 75, 45, 10.1139/o97-007 · DOI
  7. Fisher, 1999, Lipid binding-induced conformational changes in the N-terminal domain of apolipoprotein E, J. Lipid Res., 40, 93, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)33343-5 · DOI
  8. Weers, 2001, Modulation of the lipid binding properties of the N-terminal domain of human apolipoprotein E3, Eur. J. Biochem., 268, 3728, 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2001.02282.x · DOI
  9. Selvin, 1995, Fluorescence resonance energy transfer, Methods Enzymol., 246, 300, 10.1016/0076-6879(95)46015-2 · DOI
  10. Innerarity, 1979, Binding of arginine-rich (E) apoprotein after recombination with phospholipid vesicles to the low density lipoprotein receptors of fibroblasts, J. Biol. Chem., 254, 4186, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)50713-4 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Fass, 1997, Molecular basis of familial hypercholesterolemia from structure of LDL receptor module, Nature., 388, 691, 10.1038/41798 · DOI
  12. Innerarity, 1978, Enhanced binding by cultured human fibroblasts of apo-E-containing lipoproteins as compared with low density lipoproteins, Biochemistry., 17, 1440, 10.1021/bi00601a013 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Rudenko, 2002, Structure of the LDL receptor extracellular domain at endosomal pH, Science., 298, 2353, 10.1126/science.1078124 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Rudenko, 2003, The low density lipoprotein receptor: ligands, debates and lore, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 13, 683, 10.1016/j.sbi.2003.10.001 · DOI
  15. Russell, 1989, Different combinations of cysteine rich repeats mediate binding of low density lipoprotein receptor to two different proteins, J. Biol. Chem., 264, 21682, 10.1016/S0021-9258(20)88240-4 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Brown, 1986, A receptor-mediated pathway for cholesterol homeostasis, Science., 232, 34, 10.1126/science.3513311 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Jeon, 2005, Structure and physiologic function of the low-density lipoprotein receptor, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 74, 535, 10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133354 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yamamoto, T., Lamoureux, J., & Ryan, R. O.
Venue
Journal of Lipid Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
1091-1096
ISSN
0022-2275
Cited by
15
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review