Cited by 367Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Research Studies

Phase III Study, V-15-32, of Gefitinib Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Japanese Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Open access
Maruyama, Riichiroh, Nishiwaki, Yutaka, Tamura, Tomohide, Yamamoto, Nobuyuki, Tsuboi, Masahiro, Nakagawa, Kazuhiko, Shinkai, Tetsu, Negoro, Shunichi +12 more·2008·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: This phase III study (V-15-32) compared gefitinib (250 mg/d) with docetaxel (60 mg/m 2) in patients (N = 489) with advanced/metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had failed one or two chemotherapy regimens. Methods: The primary objective was to compare overall survival to demonstrate noninferiority for gefitinib relative to docetaxel. An unadjusted Cox regression model was used for the primary analysis. Results: Noninferiority in overall survival was not achieved (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95.24% CI, 0.89 to 1.40) according to the predefined criterion (upper CI limit for HR ≤ 1.25); however, no significant difference in overall survival (P = .330) was apparent between treatments. Poststudy, 36% of gefitinib-treated patients received subsequent docetaxel, and 53% of docetaxel-treated patients received subsequent gefitinib. Gefitinib significantly improved objective response rate and quality of life versus docetaxel; progression-free survival, disease control rates, and symptom improvement were similar for the two treatments. Grades 3 to 4 adverse events occurred in 40.6% (gefitinib) and 81.6% (docetaxel) of patients. Incidence of interstitial lung disease was 5.7% (gefitinib) and 2.9% (docetaxel). Four deaths occurred due to adverse events in the gefitinib arm (three deaths as a result of interstitial lung disease, judged to be treatment related; one as a result of pneumonia, not treatment related), and none occurred in the docetaxel arm. Conclusion: Noninferiority in overall survival between gefitinib and docetaxel was not demonstrated according to predefined criteria; however, there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival. Secondary end points showed similar or superior efficacy for gefitinib compared with docetaxel. Gefitinib remains an effective treatment option for previously treated Japanese patients with NSCLC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2007.15.0185

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maruyama, R., Nishiwaki, Y., Tamura, T., Yamamoto, N., Tsuboi, M., Nakagawa, K., Shinkai, T., Negoro, S., Imamura, F., Eguchi, K., Takeda, K., Inoue, A., Tomii, K., Harada, M., Masuda, N., Jiang, H., Itoh, Y., Ichinose, Y., Saijo, N., & Fukuoka, M.
Affiliations
Tokai University (JP)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2008-09-10
Volume
26
Issue
26
Pages
4244-4252
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2153942353
Cited by
367
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 29
FWCI
39.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • AstraZeneca
  • Sanofi
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology
  • Chugai Pharmaceutical
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
gefitinib, docetaxel, non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic lung cancer, previously treated patients, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, non-inferiority, overall survival, interstitial lung disease, adverse events, Japanese patients
MeSH terms
Docetaxel, Gefitinib, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Quinazolines, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Taxoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review