Cited by 70Cancer survivorship and careAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

A pilot randomized controlled trial of cognitive bias modification to reduce fear of breast cancer recurrence

Open access
Lichtenthal, Wendy G., Corner, Geoffrey W., Slivjak, Elizabeth T., Roberts, Kailey E., Li, Yuelin, Breitbart, William, Lacey, Stephanie, Tuman, Malwina +3 more·2017·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The most common, persistent concern among survivors of breast cancer is the fear that their disease will return, yet to the authors' knowledge, few interventions targeting fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) have been developed to date. The current pilot study examined the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a home‐delivered cognitive bias modification intervention to reduce FCR. The intervention, called Attention and Interpretation Modification for Fear of Breast Cancer Recurrence (AIM‐FBCR), targeted 2 types of cognitive biases (ie, attention and interpretation biases). METHODS: A total of 110 survivors of breast cancer were randomized to receive 8 sessions of 1 of 2 versions of AIM‐FBCR or a control condition program. Computer‐based assessments of cognitive biases and a self‐report measure of FCR were administered before the intervention, after the intervention, and 3 months after the intervention. RESULTS: Improvements in health worries (P = .019) and interpretation biases (rates of threat endorsement [P<.001] and reaction times for threat rejection [P = .007]) were found in those survivors who received AIM‐FBCR compared with the control arm. Although only 26% of participants who screened into the study agreed to participate, the trial otherwise appeared feasible and acceptable, with 83% of those who initiated the intervention completing at least 5 of 8 sessions, and 90% reporting satisfaction with the computer‐based program used. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current pilot study suggest the promise of AIM‐FBCR in reducing FCR in survivors of breast cancer. Future research should attempt to replicate these findings in a larger‐scale trial using a more sophisticated, user‐friendly program and additional measures of improvement in more diverse samples. Cancer 2017;123:1424–1433. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.30478

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [40]Price RB Kuckertz JM Siegle GJ Empirical recommendations for improving the stability of the dot-probe task in clinical research Psychological assessment 2014 PMC4442069 25419646

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lichtenthal, W. G., Corner, G. W., Slivjak, E. T., Roberts, K. E., Li, Y., Breitbart, W., Lacey, S., Tuman, M., DuHamel, K. N., Blinder, V. S., & Beard, C.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Lichtenthal, Wendy G.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01-05
Volume
123
Issue
8
Pages
1424-1433
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2567934534
Cited by
70
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • T.J. Martell Foundation
  • National Cancer Institute (P30 CA008748)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
cognitive bias modification, fear of cancer recurrence, breast cancer survivors, attentional bias, interpretation bias, computer-based intervention, feasibility and acceptability, health worry
MeSH terms
Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Cognition, Combined Modality Therapy, Fear, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Neoplasm Staging, Pilot Projects, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review