Cited by 223Cancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Effects of physical exercise during adjuvant breast cancer treatment on physical and psychosocial dimensions of cancer-related fatigue: a meta-analysis

Open access
van Vulpen, Jonna K., Peeters, Petra H.M., Velthuis, Miranda J., van der Wall, Elsken, May, Anne M.·2016·Maturitas

Abstract

Cancer-related fatigue has a multidimensional nature and complaints typically increase during adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. Physical exercise might prevent or reduce cancer-related fatigue. So far, no meta-analysis has investigated the effects of physical exercise on different dimensions of fatigue. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to investigate the effects of physical exercise during adjuvant breast cancer treatment on physical and psychosocial dimensions of fatigue. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library in June 2015. Randomised controlled trials reporting the effects of physical exercise during adjuvant breast cancer treatment on different dimensions of fatigue were included. Pooled effects of 6 exercise programmes (including 784 patients) showed significant beneficial exercise effects on general fatigue (ES: -0.22, 95% CI -0.38; -0.05) and physical fatigue (ES: -0.35, 95% CI -0.49; -0.21). Effects on fatigue subscales 'reduced activity' (ES: -0.22, 95% CI -0.38; -0.05) and 'reduced motivation' (ES: -0.18, 95% CI -0.35; -0.01) were also in favour of physical exercise. No effects were found on cognitive and affective fatigue. Including only the supervised exercise programmes (n=4 studies), slightly larger pooled effect estimates were found on general fatigue (ES: -0.25, 95% CI -0.47; -0.04) and physical fatigue (-0.39, 95% CI -0.56; -0.23). In conclusion, physical exercise during adjuvant breast cancer treatment has beneficial effects on general fatigue, physical fatigue, 'reduced activity' and 'reduced motivation', but did not show effects on cognitive and affective fatigue. Largest effect sizes are found for physical fatigue, suggesting that this is the fatigue dimension most sensitive to physical exercise.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.12.007

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Indications that empowerment has been received are survivors following instructions from health workers about actions they can undertake and actively asking questions or finding out about other things they can do.

    “Some things that can be used as an indication that empowerment has been received are survivors following instructions from health workers about actions that they can undertake and actively asking questions or finding out about other things they can do [73].”
  • For training programs lasting at least 12 weeks, moderate intensity aerobic training three times per week significantly reduces cancer-related fatigue during and after treatment.

    “For training programs that last at least 12 weeks, engaging in moderate intensity aerobic training three times per week can significantly reduce cancer-related fatigue both during and after treatment(20–23).”
  • Moderate intensity combined aerobic plus resistance training 2-3 times per week may reduce cancer-related fatigue.

    “Moderate intensity combined aerobic plus resistance training sessions performed 2–3 times per week or twice weekly moderate intensity resistance training may also be effective(21, 24–26), and the latter particularly in prostate cancer(27).”
  • The efficacy of exercise for cancer-related fatigue appears independent of the level of supervision and/or setting for training.

    “The efficacy of exercise for this outcome appears to be independent of the level of supervision and/or setting for training(21, 27, 30).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Vulpen, J. K., Peeters, P. H. M., Velthuis, M. J., van der Wall, E., & May, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (NL)
Corresponding author
May, Anne M.
Venue
Maturitas
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
85
Pages
104-111
ISSN
0378-5122 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2221524813
Cited by
223
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Maturitas (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
cancer-related fatigue, physical activity, breast cancer, adjuvant therapy, physical fatigue, psychosocial fatigue, reduced activity, reduced motivation, mental fatigue, supervised exercise programme
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Exercise Therapy, Fatigue, Mental Fatigue, Female, Humans, Motivation, Quality of Life, Exercise, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review