The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of Instruments Assessing Creative and Innovative Environments Within Organizations
Abstract
This article provides a review of the available instruments for measuring work environments conducive to creativity and innovation. The following instruments were assessed: KEYS: Assessing the Climate for Creativity, Creative Climate Questionnaire, Situational Outlook Questionnaire, Team Climate Inventory, and Siegel Scale of Support for Innovation. Each instrument was described, including details about the research on the measure's norms, factor structure, reliability, and validity. It was concluded that two of the instruments are of acceptable scientific quality and are well documented in peer-reviewed literature. Too little documentation exists for the other three instruments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASSESSING THE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR CREATIVITY.
AMABILE, T. M., CONTI, R., COON, H., LAZENBY, J., & HERRON, M. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256995 · Cited by 6,029
Measuring the perceived support for innovation in organizations.
Siegel, S. M., & Kaemmerer, W. F. (1978) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.5.553 · Cited by 426
Bain, P. G., Mann, L., & Pirola-Merlo, A. (2001) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649640103200103 · Cited by 336
Creativity in the R&D Laboratory
Amabile, T., & Gryskiewicz, S. (1987) · doi:10.35613/ccl.1987.1088 · Cited by 295
COLLECTIVE CLIMATES: A TEST OF THEIR SOCIOPSYCHOLIGICAL SIGNIFICANCE.
PATTERSON, M., PAYNE, R., & WEST, M. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257074 · Cited by 63
Cited by
The meaning and measurement of implementation climate
Weiner, B. J., Belden, C. M., Bergmire, D. M., & Johnston, M. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-78 · Cited by 260
Organizational climate and creative performance in the public sector
Mutonyi, B. R., Slåtten, T., & Lien, G. (2020) · European Business Review · doi:10.1108/ebr-02-2019-0021 · Cited by 109
Systems Antecedents for Dissemination and Implementation: A Review and Analysis of Measures
Emmons, K. M., Weiner, B., Fernandez, M. E., & Tu, S.-P. (2012) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198111409748 · Cited by 72
Zadow, A., Loh, M. Y., Dollard, M. F., Mathisen, G. E., & Yantcheva, B. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1082283 · Cited by 20
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mathisen, G. E., & Einarsen, S.
- Venue
- Creativity Research Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-140
- ISSN
- 1040-0419 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6934
- OpenAlex
- W2063112148
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Instruments Assessing Creative and Innovative Environments Within Organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15326934crj1601_12
- The paper
- Mathisen, G. E., & Einarsen, S. (2004). A Review of Instruments Assessing Creative and Innovative Environments Within Organizations. Creativity Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1601_12
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
