The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using Path Analysis to Understand Executive Function Organization in Preschool Children
Abstract
There continues to be no consensus definition of executive functions. One way to understand different executive function components is to study abilities at their emergence, that is, early in development, and use advanced statistical methods to understand the interrelations among executive processes. However, to fully determine the constructs of interest, these methods often require complete data on a large battery of tasks, which are difficult to obtain with young children. Path analysis is an alternative statistical technique that requires only a single measure of each construct, yet still allows researchers to investigate complex relations among measures, to compare nested models, and to compare model fit across groups. Therefore, 117 preschool children (ages 2 years 8 months to 6 years 0 months) completed several executive function tasks. Path analysis was used to determine the relations between complex problem solving and working memory, inhibition, and set shifting processes. The best-fitting model included paths from working memory and inhibition to problem solving, and a correlation between working memory and inhibition. Interestingly, in younger children, inhibition was the strongest predictor of problem solving, whereas working memory contributed more strongly in older children. Suggestions for useful statistical methods to investigate the relations among executive functions in children are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 · Cited by 15,798
Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data
Schafer, J. L. (1997) · doi:10.1201/9781439821862 · Cited by 6,012 · cited 2×
“Recent advances in missing data techniques, such as multiple imputation (Schafer, 1997), may be useful in the application of structural equation modeling procedures to data from populations where obtaining complete data on large test batteries can be difficult, such as certain clinical populations,…”
BackgroundDissociation in prefrontal cortex of affective and attentional shifts
Dias, R., Robbins, T. W., & Roberts, A. C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/380069a0 · Cited by 1,527
A normative‐developmental study of executive function: A window on prefrontal function in children
Welsh, M. C., Pennington, B. F., & Groisser, D. B. (1991) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565649109540483 · Cited by 1,313
Dias, R., Robbins, T. W., & Roberts, A. C. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-23-09285.1997 · Cited by 555
Are the frontal lobes implicated in “planning” functions? Interpreting data from the Tower of Hanoi
Goel, V., & Grafman, J. (1995) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(95)90866-p · Cited by 510
Planning and spatial working memory: A positron emission tomography study in humans
Owen, A. M., Doyon, J., Petrides, M., & Evans, A. C. (1996) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.1996.tb01219.x · Cited by 450
An interactive framework for examining prefrontal cognitive processes
Roberts, R. J., & Pennington, B. F. (1996) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565649609540642 · Cited by 392
The shape school: Assessing executive function in preschool children
Espy, K. A. (1997) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565649709540690 · Cited by 315
Self-citationEspy, K. A., Kaufmann, P. M., McDiarmid, M. D., & Glisky, M. L. (1999) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1006/brcg.1999.1117 · Cited by 226
Self-citation
Cited by
A Developmental Perspective on Executive Function
Best, J. R., & Miller, P. H. (2010) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01499.x · Cited by 2,692
Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework.
Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.31 · Cited by 2,695
Developmentally Sensitive Measures of Executive Function in Preschool Children
Carlson, S. M. (2005) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2802_3 · Cited by 1,638
Executive functions and achievements in school: Shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memory
St Clair-Thompson, H. L., & Gathercole, S. E. (2006) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470210500162854 · Cited by 1,278
Executive functions after age 5: Changes and correlates.
Best, J. R., Miller, P. H., & Jones, L. L. (2009) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2009.05.002 · Cited by 1,007
Metadata
- Authors
- Senn, T. E., Espy, K. A., & Kaufmann, P. M.
- Venue
- Developmental Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 445-464
- ISSN
- 1532-6942 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-5641
- OpenAlex
- W1976702131
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using Path Analysis to Understand Executive Function Organization in Preschool Children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15326942dn2601_5
- The paper
- Senn, T. E., Espy, K. A., & Kaufmann, P. M. (2004). Using Path Analysis to Understand Executive Function Organization in Preschool Children. Developmental Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2601_5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.