Cited by 17Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsVestibular and auditory disordersNausea and vomiting management

An Experimental Evaluation of Sensory Conflict Versus Postural Control Theories of Motion Sickness

Warwick-Evans, Lawrence, Beaumont, Stephen·1995·Ecological Psychology

Abstract

Riccio and Stoffregen (1991) presented a radical alternative to the widely accepted sensory conflict theory of motion sickness. Essentially, they argued that motion sickness is caused not by sensory conflict, but by postural instability. The current experiment was designed to evaluate three aspects of the two theories. Participants were exposed to two levels of sensory conflict while being partially restrained to reduce the possibility of postural instability. The results were that (1) motion sickness was widespread although there were few signs of postural instability, (2) difference in motion sickness were associated with differences in sensory conflict rather than with differences in postural stability, and (3) the frequency range of movements that preceded symptoms of motion sickness was not in the 4 to 8 Hz band, contrary to the prediction of Riccio and Stoffregen. Although these results must be treated with caution due to the limits of the resolving power of the analysis of participants' movements, we conclude that although the postural instability explanation has more ecological validity, it is not correct in its current form and deserves further empirical investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15326969eco0703_1

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of the relationship between postural instability and onset of motion sickness show little support for the ecological theory of motion sickness.

    “Studies of the relationship between postural instability and onset of motion sickness also show little support for the ecological theory of motion sickness (Owen et al. 1998; Warwick-Evans and Beaumont 1991; Warwick-Evans et al. 1998).”

    From Motion sickness: more than nausea and vomiting (2014) · cites this paper as Warwick-Evans and Beaumont 1991

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Warwick-Evans, L., & Beaumont, S.
Venue
Ecological Psychology
Published
1995-09
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
163-179
ISSN
  • 1040-7413 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6969
OpenAlex
W1964476603
Cited by
17
References
7
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecological Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
Keywords
motion sickness, sensory conflict theory, postural instability, postural control, movement frequency, vestibular perception, ecological validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review