Cited by 3,041Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments

Paas, Fred, Renkl, Alexander, Sweller, John·2003·Educational Psychologist

Abstract

(2003). Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments. Educational Psychologist: Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 1-4.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15326985ep3801_1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–107 of 107

Metadata

Authors
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J.
Affiliations
  • Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Educational Psychologist
Published
2003-01-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
1-4
ISSN
  • 0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6985
OpenAlex
W2046036800
Cited by
3,041
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 397 · 2025: 264 · 2024: 185 · 2023: 167 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 173 · 2020: 151 · 2019: 204 · 2018: 130 · 2017: 114 · 2016: 117 · 2015: 112 · 2014: 117 · 2013: 135 · 2012: 102
FWCI
52.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
cognitive load theory, instructional design, working memory, instructional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review