Cited by 366Science Education and PedagogyProblem and Project Based LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Addressing the challenges of inquiry‐based learning through technology and curriculum design

Edelson, Daniel, Gordin, Douglas, Pea, Roy·1999·Journal of the Learning Sciences

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327809jls0803&4_3

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1994). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Asbell-Clarke, J. & Barclay, T. (1996). Discovering the scientist within: Hands-On Universe. In Hands-On! (Vol. 19, pp. 4 5 , 17). Cambridge, MA: TERC.
  3. Bnmer J. S., 1961, Harvard Education Review., 31, 21
  4. Dewey, J. (1 964a). Progressive organization of subject matter. In R. D. Archambault (Ed.), John Dewey on education: Selected writings (pp. 373-387). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  5. Dewey, J. (1964b). Science as subject matter andasmethod. In R. D. Archambault (Ed.), John Deweyon education: Selected wrirings (pp. 182-1 95). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  6. Edelson, D. C. (1998b). Realising authentic science learning through the adaptation ofscience practice. In B. J. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook ofscience Education (pp. 3 17-33 1). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  7. Eisenberg M., 1997, JournalofCumputers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16, 477
  8. Fishman, B. & D'Am~co, L. (1994). Which way will the wlnd blow? Networked tools for studying the weather. In T. Ottmann & I. Tomek (Eds.), Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 1994 (pp. 209-216). Vancouver, BC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
  9. Gomez. L. M., Gordin, D. N. & Carlson, P. (1995). A case study of open-ended scientific inquiry in a technology supported classroom. In .I. Greer (Ed.), Proceedings ofAI-Ed '95, Seventh World Conference on Art~ficiallntelligence in Education (pp. 17-24). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
  10. Greeno, J., Collins, A. & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In R. Calfee & D. Berliner (Eds.), Handbook of educationalpsychology. New York: Macmillan.
  11. Krajcik J., 1998, The Journal ofthe Learning Sciences., 7, 13
  12. McConnick, B. H., DeFanti, T. A, & Brown, M. D. (Eds.). (1987, November). Special issue on visualization in scientific computing. Computer Graphics, 21(6).
  13. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  14. O'Neill, D. K. & Gomez, L. (1994). Thecollaboratory notebook: A distributed knowledge-building environment for project-enhanced learning. In T. Onmann & I. Tomek (Eds.), Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 1994: Proceedings ofEd-Media 94 (pp. 4 16-423). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education.
  15. Plutchak, J., Hall, S., Wojtowicz, D., Sridhar, M., Ramamurthy, M. & Wilhelmson, R. (1998).Weather World 2010: A customizable, user-oriented WWW site. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interactive Information and Processing Systems (IIPS) for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hvdrology, Phoenix, Arizona (pp. 402403).
  16. Samson, P. J., Steremberg, A, Ferguson, J., Kamprath, M., Masters, J., Monan, M. & Mullen, T. (1994, January). Blue-Skies: A new interactive teaching tool for K-12 education. Proceedings ofthe Third American Meteorological Society Education Symposium (pp. 59-514).
  17. Wallace, R., Soloway, E., Krajcik, J., Bos, N., Hoffman, J., Hunter, H., Kiskis, D., Klann, E., Peters, G., Richardson, D. & Ronen, 0. (1998, April). ARTEMIS: Learner-centered design of an information seeking environment for K-12 education. Conference Proceedings ofCH198: Human Factors in Computing Systems, Los Angeles. California (pp. 195-202). New York: ACM. · DOI
  18. Wilensky, U. & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal ofscience Education and Technologv, 8(1), 3-19.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Edelson, D., Gordin, D., & Pea, R.
Venue
Journal of the Learning Sciences
Published
1999-07-01
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
391-450
ISSN
1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4252248660
Cited by
366
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 20
FWCI
8.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Learning Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
inquiry-based learning, educational technology, curriculum development, technology integration in teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review