Cited by 661Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and Initial Validation of a Measure of Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness in Exercise: The Basic Psychological Needs in Exercise Scale

Vlachopoulos, Symeon P., Michailidou, Sotiria·2006·Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science

Abstract

The development process and initial validation of the Basic Psychological Needs in Exercise Scale (BPNES) are presented in this study. The BPNES is a domain-specific self-report instrument designed to assess perceptions of the extent to which the innate needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness (Deci & Ryan, 2000) are satisfied in exercise. Two separate samples of 508 and 504 participants were employed from private fitness centers for scale calibration and validation purposes, respectively. The results demonstrated an adequate factor structure, internal consistency, generalizability of the factor dimensionality across the calibration and the validation samples, discriminant validity and predictive validity; acceptable stability of the BPNES scores over 4 weeks also was found. In addition, the scale scores were found to be largely unaffected by socially desirable responding and specifically the tendency for impression management.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327841mpee1003_4

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 10.1037//0022-3514.79.3.367 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.2307/2334770 · DOI
  3. McAuley, E., Pena, M. M. & Jerome, G. J. (2001). Self-efficacy as a determinant and an outcome of exercise. In G. C. Roberts (Ed.), Advances in motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 235-261). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  4. 10.1037//0003-066X.50.9.741 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Ryan R. M., 1997, International Journal of Sport Psychology, 28, 335
  6. Schutz, R. W. (1998). Assessing the stability of psychological traits and measures. In J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 393-408). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
  7. 10.1037//0022-3514.76.3.482 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1037//0022-3514.72.5.1161 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 654

Metadata

Authors
Vlachopoulos, S. P., & Michailidou, S.
Affiliations
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Venue
Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
Published
2006-09
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
179-201
ISSN
  • 1091-367X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7841
OpenAlex
W1998733243
Cited by
661
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 26
FWCI
8.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
autonomy, competence, relatedness, self-determination theory, exercise motivation, scale development, psychometric validation, impression management, social desirability bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review