CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 176Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorPhilosophy of Biology and Scientific ExplanationAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 128 of the 151 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are Evolutionary Explanations Unfalsifiable? Evolutionary Psychology and the Lakatosian Philosophy of Science

Ketelaar, Timothy, Ellis, Bruce J.·2000·Psychological Inquiry
DOI 10.1207/s15327965pli1101_01
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Are the methods and strategies that evolutionary psychologists use to generate and test hypotheses scientifically defensible? This target article addresses this question by reviewing principles of philosophy of science that are used to construct and evaluate metatheoretical research programs and applying these principles to evaluate evolutionary psychology. Examples of evolutionary models of family violence, sexual jealousy, and male parental investment are utilized to evaluate whether the procedures for developing and testing evolutionary psychological models are consistent with contemporary philosophy of science. Special attention is paid to the generation of competing theories and hypotheses within a single evolutionary framework. It is argued that this competition is a function of the multiple levels of scientific explanation employed by evolutionary psychologists, and that this explanatory system adheres to the Lakatosian philosophy of science. The charge that evolutionary theories and hypotheses are unfalsifiable is unwarranted and has its roots in a commonly accepted, but mistaken, Popperian view of how science operates. Modern evolutionary theory meets the Lakatosian criterion of "progressivity," based on its ability to digest apparent anomalies and generate novel predictions and explanations. Evolutionary psychology has the hallmarks of a currently progressive research program capable of providing us with new knowledge of how the mind works.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327965pli1101_01

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 151 references

23 of the 151 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Alexander, R. D. & Noonan, K. M. (1979). Concealment of ovulation, parental care, and human social behavior. In N. A. Chagnon & W. Irons (Eds.), Evolutionary biology and human social behavior (pp. 145-180). Boston: Duxbury.
  2. Berwick, R. C. (1998, March 15). The doors of perception: Steven Pinker and the limits of biology as ideology. Los Angeles Times Book Review, pp. 3-5.
  3. Bjorklund D. F., 1997, Child Development, 68, 144, 10.2307/1131932 · DOI
  4. 10.1037//0033-295X.100.2.204 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1037//0022-3514.72.2.346 · DOI
  6. Cramer R. E., 1996, Social, 15, 157
  7. 10.1037//0022-3514.77.2.387 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Gelles, R. J. (Ed.). (1979). Family violence. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  9. Holcomb, H. R. (1998). Testing evolutionary hypotheses. In C. Crawford & D. L. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 303-334). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  10. Horgan J., 1995, Scientific American, 273, 150
  11. 10.1037//0033-295X.101.4.608 · DOI
  12. 10.1037//0022-3514.70.6.1185 · DOI
  13. 10.1037//0022-3514.72.2.346 · DOI
  14. Sherman, P. W., Jarvis, J. U. M. & Alexander, R. D. (Eds.). (1991). The biology of the naked mole-rat. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  15. Smuts, B. B. & Gubernick, D. J. (1992). Male-infant relationships in nonhuman primates: Paternal investment or mating effort? In B. S. Hewlett (Ed.), Father-child relations: Cultural and biosocial contexts (pp. 1-30). New York: deGruyter.
  16. Surbey, M. (1990). Family composition, stress, and human menarche. In F. Bercovitch & T. Zeigler (Eds.), The socioendocrinology of primate reproduction (pp. 71-97). New York: Liss.
  17. Symons, D. (1987). If we're all Darwinians, what's the fuss about? In C. Crawford, M. Smith, & D. Krebs (Eds.), Sociobiology and psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 91-125). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  18. Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. Abramson & S. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature/sexual culture (pp. 80-118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  19. Tooby, J. & DeVore, I. (1987). The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In W. G. Kinzey (Ed.), The evolution of human behavior: Primate models (pp. 183-237). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  20. Vihko R. K., 1986, Cancer Survey, 5, 561
  21. Whitten, A. (1987). Infants and adult males. In B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, & T. T. Struhsaker (Eds.), Primate societies (pp. 343-357). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  22. Wierson M., 1993, Adolescence, 28, 913

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–176 of 176

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ketelaar, T., & Ellis, B. J.
ORCID
Ellis, Bruce J.
Venue
Psychological Inquiry
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2000-03
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
1-21
ISSN
  • 1047-840X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7965
DOI
10.1207/s15327965pli1101_01
OpenAlex
W2161807128
Cited by
176
References
151
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
15.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Inquiry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
evolutionary psychology, unfalsifiability, research programs, progressivity, Popperian falsificationism, domestic violence, sexual jealousy, male parental investment, metatheory, competing theories

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review