Cited by 561Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsFinancial Literacy and Behavior

Asset Allocation and Information Overload: The Influence of Information Display, Asset Choice, and Investor Experience

Open access
Agnew, Julie R., Szykman, Lisa R.·2005·Journal of Behavioral Finance

Abstract

This paper investigates three common differences among DC plans that may lead to varying degrees of information overload. We hypothesize that information overload is one reason DC participants often choose the default options. In two experiments, we manipulate the display of the investment information, the number of choices offered, and the similarity of these choices. In addition, we measure the financial knowledge of the participants. We test how these factors influence the participant's feelings of information overload, decision satisfaction and choice of the default. The main contribution of this analysis is that it explores the interaction between the individual's tested financial knowledge and the manipulated plan features. In our study, women with relatively lower salaries and less education tend to fall into our low knowledge category. Our findings do show that changes to plan design can help some individuals. We find individuals with above average financial knowledge do report significantly less overload when given fewer investment choices. This confirms previous research that plan design is important. Our results also show that financial knowledge plays a large role in who opts for the default. We find that low knowledge individuals opt for the default allocation more often than high knowledge individuals (experiment one: 20% vs. 2%). Our findings suggest individuals with below average knowledge are simply overwhelmed by the investment decision in general. Altering the plan by offering investment information in a more easily comparable format or by reducing the choices offered does not attenuate the low knowledge individuals' feelings of overload. The findings suggest that the success of certain plan features depends strongly on the financial background of the participant. The results emphasize the importance of plan design, especially the careful selection of plan default options, and the need to improve the financial literacy of participants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15427579jpfm0602_2

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals tend to be overly confident about how much they really know.

    “Comparing test-based and self-assessed financial literacy, the literature reveals that individuals tend to be overly confident about how much they really know (e.g., Agnew and Szykman 2005).”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Agnew and Szykman 2005

  • There is a median correlation of 0.49 between actual and self-assessed financial literacy scores.

    “Agnew and Szykman (2005), for instance, document a median correlation of 0.49 between actual and self-assessed financial literacy scores”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Agnew and Szykman (2005)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agnew, J. R., & Szykman, L. R.
Affiliations
William & Mary (US)
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Finance
Published
2005-06
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
57-70
ISSN
  • 1520-8834 (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-7560
  • 1542-7579
OpenAlex
W1976943697
Cited by
561
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 20
FWCI
46.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Finance (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Social Security Administration
  • Boston College
  • Center for Retirement Research, Boston College
  • Strong
  • Australian Government
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy and Behavior
Keywords
information overload, defined contribution pensions, asset allocation, default options, path of least resistance, investment decision-making, information visualization, financial literacy, investor experience, plan design, retirement savings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review