The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategies and Methods for Research on Sex Differences in Brain and Behavior
Abstract
Female and male brains differ. Differences begin early during development due to a combination of genetic and hormonal events and continue throughout the lifespan of an individual. Although researchers from a myriad of disciplines are beginning to appreciate the importance of considering sex differences in the design and interpretation of their studies, this is an area that is full of potential pitfalls. A female’s reproductive status and ovarian cycle have to be taken into account when studying sex differences in health and disease susceptibility, in the pharmacological effects of drugs, and in the study of brain and behavior. To investigate sex differences in brain and behavior there is a logical series of questions that should be answered in a comprehensive investigation of any trait. First, it is important to determine that there is a sex difference in the trait in intact males and females, taking into consideration the reproductive cycle of the female. Then, one must consider whether the sex difference is attributable to the actions of gonadal steroids at the time of testing and/or is sexually differentiated permanently by the action of gonadal steroids during development. To answer these questions requires knowledge of how to assess and/or manipulate the hormonal condition of the subjects in the experiment appropriately. This article describes methods and procedures to assist scientists new to the field in designing and conducting experiments to investigate sex differences in research involving both laboratory animals and humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Two receptor systems for corticosterone in rat brain: Microdistribution and differential occupation
REUL, J. M. H. M., & KLOET, E. R. D. (1985) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/endo-117-6-2505 · Cited by 2,580
PHOENIX, C. H., GOY, R. W., GERALL, A. A., & YOUNG, W. C. (1959) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/endo-65-3-369 · Cited by 1,934
Sexual Differentiation of the Central Nervous System
MacLusky, N. J., & Naftolin, F. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6163211 · Cited by 1,469
Corticosteroid inhibition of acth secretion
KELLER-WOOD, M. E., & DALLMAN, M. F. (1984) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv-5-1-1 · Cited by 1,219
Puberty and depression: the roles of age, pubertal status and pubertal timing.
ANGOLD, A., COSTELLO, E. J., & WORTHMAN, C. M. (1998) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329179700593x · Cited by 989
Rivier, C., & Rivest, S. (1991) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod45.4.523 · Cited by 799
Schmidt, P. J., Nieman, L. K., Danaceau, M. A., Adams, L. F., & Rubinow, D. R. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199801223380401 · Cited by 765
Salivary cortisol: a better measure of adrenal cortical function than serum cortisol
Vining, R. F., McGinley, R. A., Maksvytis, J. J., & Ho, K. Y. (1983) · Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1177/000456328302000601 · Cited by 684
SEX DIFFERENCES IN ADRENAL CORTICAL SECRETION IN THE RAT1
KITAY, J. I. (1961) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/endo-68-5-818 · Cited by 525
De Vries, G. J., Rissman, E. F., Simerly, R. B., Yang, L.-Y., Scordalakes, E. M., Auger, C. J., Swain, A., Lovell-Badge, R., Burgoyne, P. S., & Arnold, A. P. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-20-09005.2002 · Cited by 509
Self-citation
Cited by
Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research
Beery, A. K., & Zucker, I. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.07.002 · Cited by 1,763
Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies
Clayton, J. A., & Collins, F. S. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/509282a · Cited by 1,816
Why sex matters for neuroscience
Cahill, L. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1909 · Cited by 1,540
In vivo effects of bisphenol A in laboratory rodent studies
Richter, C. A., Birnbaum, L. S., Farabollini, F., Newbold, R. R., Rubin, B. S., Talsness, C. E., Vandenbergh, J. G., Walser-Kuntz, D. R., & vom Saal, F. S. (2007) · Reproductive Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.06.004 · Cited by 1,147
Erol, A., & Karpyak, V. M. (2015) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.08.023 · Cited by 1,022
Metadata
- Authors
- Becker, J. B., Arnold, A. P., Berkley, K. J., Blaustein, J. D., Eckel, L. A., Hampson, E., Herman, J. P., Marts, S., Sadee, W., Steiner, M., Taylor, J., & Young, E.
- Venue
- Endocrinology
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2005-04-01
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1650-1673
- ISSN
- 0013-7227 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7170
- OpenAlex
- W2056439165
- Cited by
- 801
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 9.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategies and Methods for Research on Sex Differences in Brain and Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/en.2004-1142
- The paper
- Becker, J. B., Arnold, A. P., Berkley, K. J., Blaustein, J. D., Eckel, L. A., Hampson, E., Herman, J. P., Marts, S., Sadee, W., Steiner, M., Taylor, J., & Young, E. (2005). Strategies and Methods for Research on Sex Differences in Brain and Behavior. Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2004-1142
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
