Cited by 133Ovarian function and disordersReproductive Biology and FertilitySexual Differentiation and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physiological and Pathological Androgen Actions in the Ovary

Open access

Abstract

Androgens, although traditionally thought to be male sex steroids, play important roles in female reproduction, both in healthy and pathological states. This mini-review focuses on recent advances in our knowledge of the role of androgens in the ovary. Androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in oocytes, granulosa cells, and theca cells, and is temporally regulated during follicular development. Mouse knockout studies have shown that AR expression in granulosa cells is critical for normal follicular development and subsequent ovulation. In addition, androgens are involved in regulating dynamic changes in ovarian steroidogenesis that are critical for normal cycling. Androgen effects on follicle development have been incorporated into clinical practice in women with diminished ovarian reserve, albeit with limited success in available literature. At the other extreme, androgen excess leads to disordered follicle development and anovulatory infertility known as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), with studies suggesting that theca cell AR may mediate many of these negative effects. Finally, both prenatal and postnatal animal models of androgen excess have been developed and are being used to study the pathophysiology of PCOS both within the ovary and with regard to overall metabolic health. Taken together, current scientific consensus is that a careful balance of androgen activity in the ovary is necessary for reproductive health in women.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/en.2019-00101

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–132 of 132

Metadata

Authors
Astapova, O., Minor, B. M. N., & Hammes, S. R.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Hammes, Stephen R
Venue
Endocrinology
Published
2019-03-26
Volume
160
Issue
5
Pages
1166-1174
ISSN
  • 0013-7227 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7170
OpenAlex
W2923411756
Cited by
133
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Endocrinology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Department of Health (F32HD097939-01)
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
androgens, androgen receptor, ovary, folliculogenesis, ovulation, ovarian steroidogenesis, menstrual cycle, diminished ovarian reserve, polycystic ovary syndrome, hyperandrogenism, theca cells, granulosa cells, oocytes, anovulatory infertility, reproductive health
MeSH terms
Androgens, Animals, Female, Ovarian Follicle, Granulosa Cells, Humans, Receptors, Androgen, Theca Cells, Gene Expression, Mice, Knockout

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review