Cited by 712Ovarian function and disordersReproductive Biology and FertilityReproductive Physiology in Livestock

Androgens stimulate early stages of follicular growth in the primate ovary

Open access
Vendola, K A, Zhou, J, Adesanya, O O, Weil, S J, Bondy, C A·1998·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

The concept that androgens are atretogenic, derived from murine ovary studies, is difficult to reconcile with the fact that hyperandrogenic women have more developing follicles than normal-cycling women. To evaluate androgen's effects on primate follicular growth and survival, normal-cycling rhesus monkeys were treated with placebo-, testosterone-(T), or dihydrotestosterone-sustained release implants, and ovaries were taken for histological analysis after 3-10 d of treatment. Growing preantral and small antral follicles up to 1 mm in diameter were significantly and progressively increased in number and thecal layer thickness in T-treated monkeys from 3-10 d. Granulosa and thecal cell proliferation, as determined by immunodetection of the Ki67 antigen, were significantly increased in these follicles. Preovulatory follicles (> 1 mm), however, were not increased in number in androgen-treated animals. Follicular atresia was not increased and there were actually significantly fewer apoptotic granulosa cells in the T-treated groups. Dihydrotestosterone treatment had identical effects, indicating that these growth-promoting actions are mediated by the androgen receptor. These findings show that, over the short term at least, androgens are not atretogenic and actually enhance follicular growth and survival in the primate. These new data provide a plausible explanation for the pathogenesis of "polycystic" ovaries in hyperandrogenism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci2081

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vendola, K. A., Zhou, J., Adesanya, O. O., Weil, S. J., & Bondy, C. A.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
ORCID
Zhou, J
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1998-06-15
Volume
101
Issue
12
Pages
2622-2629
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114124243
Cited by
712
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 40
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
Keywords
androgens, folliculogenesis, follicular atresia, rhesus monkeys, testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, androgen receptor, granulosa cell proliferation, Ki-67, apoptosis, preantral follicles, polycystic ovary syndrome, hyperandrogenism, ovary
MeSH terms
Androgens, Animals, Cell Count, Cell Division, Female, Ovarian Follicle, Macaca mulatta, Organ Size, Ovary, Cell Death

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review