Cited by 48Stress Responses and CortisolAdrenal Hormones and DisordersBirth, Development, and Health

Editorial: Moments in Time—The Neonatal Rat Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis

Dallman, Mary F.·2000·Endocrinology

Abstract

The functional activity of the hypothalamo-pituitary- adrenal (HPA) axis of neonatal rats exposed to stressors has provided an intriguing source of study to endocrinologists for decades. The studies can be divided into three phases, each of which depended to an extent on new methodology and modified the interpretation of what was going on in control of the neonatal HPA axis. Between 1950 and the 1970s, when determination of the activity in the HPA axis depended on bioassays for ACTH and fairly insensitive assays for corticosterone, the neonatal HPA axis was thought to undergo a stress nonresponsive period (SNRP) between days 3–14 of life (1, 2). Although, at the end of gestation and during the first day of life, fetal and very young neonatal rats were shown to respond to stress with increased corticosterone, this responsivity vanished in subsequent days, not to return until after 2 weeks postpartum. Based on the lack of plasma and adrenal corticosterone responses to many different stressors after day 1 of life, the results suggested that the axis was absolutely unresponsive, and that, if there was any response to stress at all, it was very slow compared with that of adults (3). In retrospect, this period of study pointed strongly to both insensitivity of the adrenal gland to stimulation by ACTH, and to the lack of amplification of corticosterone levels in plasma because of very low levels of the corticosteroid binding protein, transcortin (4). Subsequently, study of the adrenal capacity to synthesize and secrete glucocorticoids in response to ACTH has shown that in sheep, the fetal adrenal undergoes a period of unresponsiveness like that of the neonatal rat adrenal (5). The precise mechanism(s) of this damped adrenal responsivity to ACTH is still unknown, although in fetal sheep it appears to involve immaturity at the membrane receptor system (5). In infant rats, although insensitive to ACTH, there is a relatively high level of constitutive corticosterone secretion (6) that provides basal levels of nonrhythmic corticosterone in plasma allowing maturation, without excess, of developing corticosteroid-responsive systems. Although the mechanism of adrenal insensitivity to ACTH in neonatal rats is not solved, a very tight, positive correlation between the corticosterone response to ACTH and the peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor has been demonstrated, suggesting that this cholesterol transporter may be a key to the stress-hyporesponsive adrenal (7). The periods of hyporesponsiveness appear to be highly protective for the organisms. Because elevated fetal corticosteroids appear to trigger parturition in sheep (5), and elevated corticosteroids result in harmful developmental advances in neonatal rats (8), banking of adrenal fires is a physiologically meaningful protective mechanism. In the 1980s and 1990s, cracks appeared in the monolithic notion of a fetal or neonatal period of HPA unresponsiveness, and during this time, the phenomenon acquired the sobriquet of the “stress-hyporesponsive period” (SHRP) (9). During this period, there was a report that the capacity of CRF to respond to adrenalectomy or stress was highly limited ontogenetically, and that this could explain the SHRP (10). However, there was also evidence that this might not be the case. Adrenalectomy was shown to produce increases in ACTH that were of both normal amplitude and time-course, compared with adults (11); the characteristics of the adult HPA axis of corticosteroid feedback sensitivity (12) and facilitated responsivity to repeated stressors (13) were shown to be similar in neonates during the SHRP. A stunning example of full responsivity of ACTH secretion to stress during the SHRP of rats was provided by showing remarkably normal responses to injected endotoxin throughout this period (14). Responsivity in the usual neural components of the HPA axis during the SHRP was far less certain. Although stimuli provoked evidence for increased neural activity in the hypothalamic paraventricular nuclei (PVN) (15), most reported that many of the stimuli shown to provoke elevated ACTH secretion in neonatal rats did not stimulate normal increases in CRF gene transcription as they do in adult rats. The paper by Dent and Levine (16) in this issue of Endocrinology now clarifies this problem and suggests strongly that not only do neonatal rats work in their own time domain, but, as in any good paper, also suggests that there are other mysteries about the rich neonatal HPA axis left to be plumbed. After the relatively minor stimulus of ip injection of isotonic saline, Dent and Levine (16) show that significant responses occur in expression of both heteronuclear RNA (hnRNA) and messenger RNA (mRNA) for CRF in the PVN, as well as in plasma ACTH and corticosterone in rat pups exposed at 6, 12, or 18 days of life. At all ages, the authors show significant responses in all variables in pups that heteronuclear RNA (hnRNA) remained with their mothers until the

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/endo.141.5.7527

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dallman, M. F.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Dallman, Mary F.
Venue
Endocrinology
Published
2000-05-01
Volume
141
Issue
5
Pages
1590-1592
ISSN
  • 0013-7227 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7170
OpenAlex
W2041833534
Cited by
48
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, neonatal rats, ACTH, corticosterone, corticosteroid-binding globulin, glucocorticoid receptor, translocator protein (TSPO), fetal adrenal development, glucocorticoid feedback, glucocorticoid synthesis, glucocorticoid secretion
MeSH terms
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Stress, Physiological, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review