Cited by 240Circadian rhythm and melatoninRegulation of Appetite and ObesityAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 37 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Independent Circadian and Sleep/Wake Regulation of Adipokines and Glucose in Humans

Open access
Shea, Steven A., Hilton, Michael F., Orlova, Christine, Ayers, R. Timothy, Mantzoros, Christos S.·2005·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Leptin and adiponectin play important physiological roles in regulating appetite, food intake, and energy balance and have pathophysiological roles in obesity and anorexia nervosa. To assess the relative contributions of day/night patterns in behaviors (sleep/wake cycle and food intake) and of the endogenous circadian pacemaker on observed day/night patterns of adipokines, in six healthy subjects we measured circulating leptin, soluble leptin receptor, adiponectin, glucose, and insulin levels throughout a constant routine protocol (38 h of wakefulness with constant posture, temperature, and dim light, as well as identical snacks every 2 h) and throughout sleep and fasting periods before and after the constant routine. There were significant endogenous circadian rhythms in leptin, glucose, and insulin, with peaks around the usual time of awakening. Sleep/fasting resulted in additional systematic decreases in leptin, glucose, and insulin, whereas wakefulness/food intake resulted in a systematic increase in leptin. Thus, the day/night pattern in leptin is likely caused by combined effects from the endogenous circadian pacemaker and day/night patterns in behaviors. Our data imply that alterations in the sleep/wake schedule would lead to an increased daily range in circulating leptin, with lowest leptin upon awakening, which, by influencing food intake and energy balance, could be implicated in the increased prevalence of obesity in the shift work population.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In six healthy subjects, a 38-h constant routine separated endogenous circadian effects from sleep/wake and fasting/feeding effects on adipokines and glucose. Leptin, glucose, and insulin had significant endogenous circadian rhythms peaking near usual awakening, while sleep/fasting and wakefulness/meals produced independent changes in leptin, glucose, and insulin.

Key findings

  • Significant group mean circadian rhythms were found for leptin (peak-to-trough 16% of mesor; individual amplitudes averaged 1.4 ng/ml, 21% around a leptin mesor of 6.5 ng/ml; 4/6 subjects significant), insulin (22%, P = 0.02), and glucose (10%, P = 0.001), with peaks around the usual time of awakening. No group mean circadian rhythm was detected for soluble leptin receptor (sOB-R) or adiponectin.
  • Independent of circadian effects, all six subjects had a significant linear increase in leptin during prolonged wakefulness/meals: average +3.33 ng/ml over 16 h, a 51% fluctuation around the leptin mesor of 6.5 ng/ml. sOB-R decreased by 3.2 ng/ml per 16 h (19% around mesor 16.3 ng/ml), and adiponectin showed a small significant group decline of 0.18 g/ml over 16 h (4% around mesor 4.05 g/ml), though only one subject had a significant individual decline.
  • Independent of circadian effects, each subject had a significant decrease in leptin across sleep/fasting: mean −0.6 ng/ml per hour (range −0.34 to −1.10), equivalent to −4.8 ng/ml over 8 h, a 74% fluctuation around the leptin mesor of 6.5 ng/ml. Sleep/fasting also decreased insulin by −0.45 IU/ml per hour (−3.6 IU/ml over 8 h; 36% around mesor 10.1 IU/ml) and glucose by −0.65 mg/dl per hour (−5.2 mg/dl over 8 h; 5% around mesor 103.4 mg/dl), with no independent sleep-related changes in sOB-R or adiponectin.
  • The authors conclude that the day/night leptin pattern reflects combined endogenous circadian and behavioral effects, and that altered sleep/wake schedules could increase the daily range in circulating leptin, with lowest leptin upon awakening, potentially relevant to shift-work-related obesity.

Methods

  • Six healthy subjects were studied with a 38-h constant routine protocol: continuous wakefulness, constant semirecumbent posture, constant temperature (~23 ± 2 C), dim light (<8 lux), and identical snacks every 2 h. Sleep and fasting periods were also measured before and after the constant routine, each with 10-h sleep opportunities.
  • Hourly blood samples were assayed for leptin, sOB-R, adiponectin, glucose, and insulin; core body temperature was recorded rectally as a circadian phase marker, and sleep was scored from EEG, EOG, and submental EMG.
  • Circadian phase and amplitude were estimated by cosinor analysis relative to the core body temperature minimum (CBTmin); group circadian effects were assessed after subtracting individual linear trends, and behavioral effects were assessed after subtracting individual circadian rhythms, using linear regression aligned to the sleep/wake schedule. The average circadian period was 24.6 h (SEM = 0.2 h).

Limitations

  • The paper states that separating circadian and behavioral effects relies on the assumption that these effects are additive; this needs direct testing, such as a forced desynchrony study.
  • The paper states that it could not independently assess meals from wakefulness, or fasting from sleep, though it argues fasting and meals likely have greater effects than sleep and wakefulness.
  • The paper notes that its findings differ from sleep-restriction studies, raising the possibility that incremental sleep restriction differs from acute sleep deprivation, and calls for longer experiments. Evident from the text: the sample was small (six subjects), and the analysis of sleep periods before and after the constant routine relied on extrapolating the circadian component from constant-routine data.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2004-2232

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

35 Own result · 20 Not checked yet · 17 Own interpretation · 8 Own method · 2 No basis given

Verify all 37 references — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 24
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 17
38 of 38
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The circadian component could be extrapolated from the constant routine data to the sleep periods on either side of the constant routine.

    “Because circadian rhythmicity was calculated during the constant routine, this last analysis relied upon our assumption that the circadian component could be extrapolated from the constant routine data to the sleep periods on either side of the constant routine.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    To the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to directly assess the independent influences of the endogenous circadian pacemaker and various physiological behaviors on adipocyte and glucose physiology using a validated circadian protocol.

    “to our knowledge, this study is the first to directly assess the independent influences of the endogenous circadian pacemaker and various physiological behaviors on adipocyte and glucose physiology using a validated circadian protocol.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The circadian and behavioral effects on the measured variables are additive.

    “Limitations of the study include the fact that our separation of circadian and behavioral effects relies upon the assumption that these effects are additive, as suggested by the statistical analyses.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 240

Metadata

Authors
Shea, S. A., Hilton, M. F., Orlova, C., Ayers, R. T., & Mantzoros, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Shea, Steven A.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2005-05
Volume
90
Issue
5
Pages
2537-2544
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2077495163
Cited by
240
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R01 57875)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K24-HL76446, K24HL076446, R01HL076409, R01HL064815, R01 HL64815)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR 02635, M01RR002635)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
circadian rhythm, leptin, adiponectin, soluble leptin receptor, glucose, insulin, sleep-wake cycle, dietary intake, energy balance, obesity, shift work, constant routine, fasting
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Circadian Rhythm, Humans, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Sleep, Wakefulness, Work Schedule Tolerance, Leptin, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Adiponectin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review