Cited by 95Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPancreatic function and diabetes

Cortisol Is Negatively Associated with Insulin Sensitivity in Overweight Latino Youth

Open access
Adam, Tanja C., Hasson, Rebecca E., Ventura, Emily E., Toledo-Corral, Claudia, Le, Kim-Ann, Mahurkar, Swapna, Lane, Christianne J., Weigensberg, Marc J. +1 more·2010·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of serum morning cortisol and aspects of insulin action in Latino children and adolescents (8-13 yr) at risk for type 2 diabetes. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: The present study includes a cross-sectional analysis in 211 participants and a longitudinal analysis in a subset of 143 participants. RESULTS: At baseline, cortisol was negatively associated with fasting glucose (r = 0.23; P < 0.01), β-cell function (disposition index, r = -0.24; P < 0.05), and acute insulin response to glucose (r = -0.27; P < 0.05). Baseline cortisol was also significantly related to the change in insulin sensitivity over 1 yr (r = -0.23; P < 0.05). These results did not differ by Tanner stage or sex. CONCLUSIONS: Cortisol contributes to the reduction in insulin sensitivity at an early age in Latino children and adolescents. Specifically, cortisol is negatively associated with potential compensatory mechanisms for insulin resistance, such as increased β-cell function and increased insulin release to a glucose challenge, by exacerbating the progression toward insulin resistance in this population. The results underline the relevance of glucocorticoid reduction for the prevention of metabolic disease in Latino children and adolescents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2010-0322

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher serum cortisol tracks with more severe and progressive insulin resistance among healthy adolescents and those predisposed to Type 2 diabetes, after body fat is considered.

    “Serum cortisol is associated with greater insulin resistance and worsening of insulin resistance in healthy adolescents and those at risk for Type 2 diabetes, even after accounting for body fat (Adam et al., 2010; Huybrechts et al., 2014; Prodam et al., 2013).”

    From Relationship of Mindfulness to Distress and Cortisol Response in Adolescent Girls At-Risk for Type 2 Diabetes. (2018) · cites this paper as Adam et al., 2010

    The Longitudinal analysis reports that higher baseline cortisol was associated with a greater one-year decline in insulin sensitivity; the Statistics section says the correlations were adjusted for total fat mass. But the Participants section limits the study to overweight Latino youth with a family history of type 2 diabetes, not healthy adolescents generally. The Cross-sectional analysis also reports no association between cortisol and insulin sensitivity at baseline. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adam, T. C., Hasson, R. E., Ventura, E. E., Toledo-Corral, C., Le, K.-A., Mahurkar, S., Lane, C. J., Weigensberg, M. J., & Goran, M. I.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Goran, Michael I.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2010-10
Volume
95
Issue
10
Pages
4729-4735
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2085457020
Cited by
95
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • University of Southern California
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01‐DK59211, F31DK081276, R01DK059211)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR-00043, M01RR000043)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
cortisol, insulin sensitivity, insulin resistance, Latino youth, children and adolescents, overweight, type 2 diabetes risk, beta-cell function, disposition index, acute insulin response, fasting blood glucose, glucocorticoids, metabolic disease prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Insulin Resistance, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review