Cited by 68Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementObesity, Physical Activity, DietDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Postnatal Lifestyle Intervention for Overweight Women With Previous Gestational Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Holmes, Valerie A, Draffin, Claire R, Patterson, Chris C, Francis, Loraine, Irwin, Joanne, McConnell, Mae, Farrell, Brid, Brennan, Sarah F +5 more·2018·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with a sevenfold increased lifetime risk of type 2 diabetes. Excessive gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention are established predictors of long-term obesity. Objective: To determine the impact of a postnatal lifestyle intervention program for overweight women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus (PAIGE). Design: Postnatal overweight women with previous GDM participated in a multicenter randomized controlled trial between June 2013 and December 2014. The intervention comprised a 1-hour educational program, a free 3-month referral to a commercial weight management organization (Slimming World), a pedometer, and structured telephone and text support, in addition to usual care. The control group received usual care only. The primary outcome was weight loss at 6 months. Results: Sixty women were randomized (29 intervention; 31 control) in two centers based on their week of attendance. The intervention group demonstrated significant weight loss at 6 months after randomization compared with the control group: mean ±SD, 3.9 ± 7.0 kg vs 0.7 ±3.8 kg (P = 0.02). Blood glucose levels did not significantly differ. With respect to well-being measures, a bodily pain was significantly reduced in the intervention group (P = 0.007). Conclusions: PAIGE resulted in significantly greater weight loss at 6 months compared with usual care. Such weight loss could prove beneficial in terms of better long-term health and subsequent prevention of type 2 diabetes in overweight women with previous GDM. Future interventions must consider recruitment strategies, timing of the intervention, and inclusion of partners and/or other family members.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2017-02654

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Muralidharan et al and Holmes et al concluded that TM, in addition to TCP, does not have a significant effect on delaying T2DM.

    “For example, Muralidharan et al [51] and Holmes et al [52] concluded that TM, in addition to TCP, does not have a significant effect on delaying T2DM.”

    From Digital Health Interventions to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Abstract reports no significant difference in blood glucose levels between the postnatal lifestyle intervention and usual care. But the intervention combined education, weight-management referral, a pedometer, and telephone and text support; the trial measured weight loss at six months, not whether telemedicine delayed type 2 diabetes. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holmes, V. A., Draffin, C. R., Patterson, C. C., Francis, L., Irwin, J., McConnell, M., Farrell, B., Brennan, S. F., McSorley, O., Wotherspoon, A. C., Davies, M., McCance, D. R., & PAIGE Study Group
Affiliations
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Belfast Health and Social Care Trust (GB)
  • Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
  • Craigavon Area Hospital (GB)
  • Public Health Agency (GB)
Corresponding author
McCance, David R
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2018-05-11
Volume
103
Issue
7
Pages
2478-2487
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2800110841
Cited by
68
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Queen's University Belfast
  • Public Health Agency
  • Queen's University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, postpartum weight retention, gestational weight gain, overweight women, weight loss, type 2 diabetes prevention, pedometers, bodily pain, educational programs
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Obesity, Pregnancy, Weight Gain, Weight Loss, Diabetes, Gestational, Treatment Outcome, Risk Reduction Behavior, Postpartum Period, Overweight, Weight Reduction Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review