Cited by 127Adrenal Hormones and DisordersPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors

Adrenocortical function in hyperprolactinemic women

CARTER, J. N., TYSON, J. E., WARNE, G. L., McNEILLY, A. S., FAIMAN, C., FRIESEN, H. G.·1977·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

To study the effects of prolactin (PRL) on adrenocortical function in humans, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHA), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHAS), androstenedione (delta) and testosterone (T) were measured in serum obtained from 35 hyperprolactinemic women with galactorrhea and amenorrhea before and after treatment with bromocriptine-induced fall in mean PRL levels from 82 +/- 8 (SE) to 14 +/- 2 ng/ml (n = 39, P less than 0.0005), DHAS fell from 322 +/- 21 to 237 +/- 21 microgram/dl (n = 39); P less than 0.0005), DHA fell from 492 +/- 47 to 378 +/- 30 ng/dl (n = 39; P less than 0.01) while T (n = 16) and delta (n = 13) levels were unchanges (44 +/- 4 vs. 49 +/- 4 ng/dl and 280 +/- 55 vs. 236 +/- 40 ng/dl, respectively). In addition, 4 women were infused iv with 25 microgram synthetic ACTH over 4 h and serial blood samples drawn while hyperprolactinemic, and again 2-4 months later following normalization of PRL levels by bromocriptine. Although pre-infusion levels of DHAS were lower when PRL levels were normalized, no significant differences in responses of circulating DHAS, DHA, T, cortisol and 17-hydroxyprogesterone concentrations were detected between the two infusions. Since DHAS is virtually an exclusive product of the adrenal cortex, and since high PRL levels appear to inhibit ovarian steroid production, the findings suggest that hyperprolactinemia selectively stimulates adrenocortical androgen production.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jcem-45-5-973

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CARTER, J. N., TYSON, J. E., WARNE, G. L., McNEILLY, A. S., FAIMAN, C., & FRIESEN, H. G.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
1977-11
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
973-980
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2017313133
Cited by
127
References
26
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
14.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Keywords
hyperprolactinemia, prolactin, adrenocortical function, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, dehydroepiandrosterone, androstenedione, testosterone, galactorrhea, amenorrhea, bromocriptine, ACTH stimulation test, adrenal androgen production, cortisol, 17-hydroxyprogesterone
MeSH terms
Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Amenorrhea, Androstenedione, Bromocriptine, Dehydroepiandrosterone, Female, Galactorrhea, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Pregnancy, Prolactin, Testosterone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review