Cited by 283Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsEstrogen and related hormone effectsSexual Differentiation and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Minireview: Endocrine Disruptors: Past Lessons and Future Directions

Open access

Abstract

Within the past few decades, the concept of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) has risen from a position of total obscurity to become a focus of dialogue, debate, and concern among scientists, physicians, regulators, and the public.The emergence and development of this field of study has not always followed a smooth path, and researchers continue to wrestle with questions about the low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses seen with EDCs, their biological mechanisms of action, the true pervasiveness of these chemicals in our environment and in our bodies, and the extent of their effects on human and wildlife health.This review chronicles the development of the unique, multidisciplinary field of endocrine disruption, highlighting what we have learned about the threat of EDCs and lessons that could be relevant to other fields.It also offers perspectives on the future of the field and opportunities to better protect human health.(Molecular Endocrinology 30: 833-847, 2016) O ver the past half-century, the concept of endocrine- disrupting chemicals (EDCs) has risen from total obscurity to become nearly a household term.A 2012 Endocrine Society statement defined endocrine disruptors as "an exogenous chemical, or mixture of chemicals, that can interfere with any aspect of hormone action" (1).These chemicals can bind to the body's endocrine receptors to activate, block, or alter natural hormone synthesis and degradation by a plethora of mechanisms resulting in "false" or abnormal hormonal signals that can increase or inhibit normal endocrine functioning (Figure 1).Scientific understanding of EDCs has undergone a remarkable evolution.In 1958, Roy Hertz presaged the idea that certain chemicals, then used in livestock feedlots, could find their way into people's bodies and mimic the activity of hormones (2).Little came of the idea until the 1970s, when physicians and researchers began to link certain chemicals with rare cancers and reproductive effects in humans and wildlife.Unfortunately, as our

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/me.2016-1096

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 113 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Kortenkamp, State of the Art Assessment of Endocrine Disrupters
  2. Carson, 1962, Silent Spring
  3. Myers, 1997, Our Stolen Future: Are We Threatening Our Fertility, Intelligence and Survival?
  4. Bern, 1992, The fragile fetus
  5. McClachlan, 1976, Transplacental toxicity of diethylstilbestrol: a special problem in safety evaluation, 423
  6. McLachlan, 1980, Estrogens and the Environment
  7. McLachlan, 1985, Estrogens and the Environment II
  8. Japan Environment Agency, 1998, Strategic Programs on Environmental Endocrine Disruptors '98
  9. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2012, Indirect food additives: polymers
  10. International Programme on Chemical Safety, 2002, Global Assessment of the State-of-the-Science of Endocrine Disruptors
  11. American Chemical Society. Statement on Testing for Endocrine Disruption. 2012. Available from http://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/policy/publicpolicies/promote/endocrinedisruptors.html. Accessed July 22, 2016
  12. World Health Organization, 2012, State of the Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals - 2012
  13. National Toxicology Program, 2001, National Toxicology Program's Report of the Endocrine Disruptors Peer Review
  14. Sutton, 2011, Pesticides Matter. A Primer for Reproductive Health Physicians
  15. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2012, OECD Conceptual Framework for Testing and Assessment of Endocrine Disrupters

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 283

Metadata

Authors
Schug, T. T., Johnson, A. F., Birnbaum, L. S., Colborn, T., Guillette, L. J., Crews, D. P., Collins, T., Soto, A. M., vom Saal, F. S., McLachlan, J. A., Sonnenschein, C., & Heindel, J. J.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • 2MDB, Inc (A.F.J.), Durham, North Carolina 27713
  • The Endocrine Disruption Exchange (T.Colb.), Paonia, Colorado 81428
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Division of Biological Sciences and Department (F.S.v.S.),University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65211
  • Tulane University (US)
Corresponding author
Schug, Thaddeus T.
Venue
Molecular Endocrinology
Published
2016-08-01
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
833-847
ISSN
  • 0888-8809 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9917
OpenAlex
W2503753278
Cited by
282
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1051623)
  • Avon Foundation for Women
  • Heinz Endowments
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01es020662-05)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01-ES020662, R01ES008314, R56ES020662, R01ES023254)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
endocrine disruptors, low-dose effects, non-monotonic dose-response, mechanism of action, environmental exposure, human health effects, hormone action, endocrine receptors, reproductive effects, cancer, regulatory policy
MeSH terms
Bisphenol A Compounds, Animals, Benzhydryl Compounds, Hormones, Humans, Phenols, Reproduction, Signal Transduction, Epigenesis, Genetic, Endocrine Disruptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review