The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Frequency, risk factors, anatomy, and course of unilateral neglect in an acute stroke cohort
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To delineate the frequency, course, risk factors, and neuroanatomy of hemispatial neglect in a large stroke cohort. METHODS: One thousand two hundred eighty-one patients with acute stroke were enrolled in a multicenter trial of an anticoagulant. Presence and severity of neglect were assessed with the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) neglect item, assessing tactile extinction and visuospatial neglect at entry, daily for 1 week, and at 3 months. Head CT scans were obtained on day 7, and infarct location and size were characterized. RESULTS: Neglect was common at presentation, occurring in 43% of right brain-lesioned (RBL) patients and 20% of left brain-lesioned (LBL) patients (p < 0.001). At 3 months, neglect was present in 17% of RBL patients and in 5% of LBL patients (p < 0.001). In RBL patients, neglect was most frequently associated with lesions involving the (in descending order) temporal, parietal, frontal, occipital lobes, basal ganglia, and thalamus. Neglect was more common and persistent with cortical than with subcortical lesions. Increasing age was associated with increased risk of neglect in RBL patients, whereas gender and handedness did not significantly affect neglect frequency. CONCLUSIONS: This series confirms that hemispatial neglect may occur with damage to several supratentorial structures but is most common and persistent with lesions of the right temporoparietal cortex. Increasing age is associated with neglect, particularly after right brain lesions. Gender and handedness do not exert a marked effect on the likelihood of the occurrence of neglect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOME AFTER SEVERE BRAIN DAMAGE A Practical Scale
JENNETT, B. (1975) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92830-5 · Cited by 7,501
Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale.
Brott, T., Adams, H. P., Olinger, C. P., Marler, J. R., Barsan, W. G., Biller, J., Spilker, J., Holleran, R., Eberle, R., & Hertzberg, V (1989) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.20.7.864 · Cited by 5,911
Self-citationHeilman, K., Valenstein, E., & Watson, R. (1984) · Seminars in Neurology · doi:10.1055/s-2008-1041551 · Cited by 830
Mort, D. J. (2003) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awg200 · Cited by 828
Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe
Karnath, H.-O., Ferber, S., & Himmelbach, M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35082075 · Cited by 815
Language processing is strongly left lateralized in both sexes: Evidence from functional MRI
Frost, J. A. (1999) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/122.2.199 · Cited by 536
The Publications Committee for the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment Investigators (1998) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.279.16.1265 · Cited by 530
Heilman, K. M., & Valenstein, E. (1972) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.22.6.660 · Cited by 445
Effect of Age on Functional Outcomes After Stroke Rehabilitation
Bagg, S., Pombo, A. P., & Hopman, W. (2002) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/hs0102.101224 · Cited by 296
Subcortical aphasia and neglect in acute stroke: the role of cortical hypoperfusion
Hillis, A. E., Wityk, R. J., Barker, P. B., Beauchamp, N. J., Gailloud, P., Murphy, K., Cooper, O., & Metter, E. J. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf113 · Cited by 296
Cited by
Hatem, S. M., Saussez, G., della Faille, M., Prist, V., Zhang, X., Dispa, D., & Bleyenheuft, Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442 · Cited by 918
Verdon, V., Schwartz, S., Lovblad, K.-O., Hauert, C.-A., & Vuilleumier, P. (2010) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awp305 · Cited by 481
Re-evaluating the role of TPJ in attentional control: Contextual updating?
Geng, J. J., & Vossel, S. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.08.010 · Cited by 411
Predictors and assessment of cognitive dysfunction resulting from ischaemic stroke.
Gottesman, R. F., & Hillis, A. E. (2010) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70164-2 · Cited by 319
White matter lesional predictors of chronic visual neglect: a longitudinal study
Lunven, M., Thiebaut De Schotten, M., Bourlon, C., Duret, C., Migliaccio, R., Rode, G., & Bartolomeo, P. (2015) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awu389 · Cited by 222
Metadata
- Authors
- Ringman, J. M., Saver, J. L., Woolson, R. F., Clarke, W. R., & Adams, H. P.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2004-08-10
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 468-474
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W1997712678
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frequency, risk factors, anatomy, and course of unilateral neglect in an acute stroke cohort. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000133011.10689.ce
- The paper
- Ringman, J. M., Saver, J. L., Woolson, R. F., Clarke, W. R., & Adams, H. P. (2004). Frequency, risk factors, anatomy, and course of unilateral neglect in an acute stroke cohort. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000133011.10689.ce
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.