CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 411Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual perception and processing mechanismsSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction

Re-evaluating the role of TPJ in attentional control: Contextual updating?

Open access
Geng, Joy J., Vossel, Simone·2013·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.08.010PMC PMC3878596
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The right temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) is widely considered as part of a network that reorients attention to task-relevant, but currently unattended stimuli (Corbetta and Shulman, 2002). Despite the prevalence of this theory in cognitive neuroscience, there is little direct evidence for the principal hypothesis that TPJ sends an early reorientation signal that "circuit breaks" attentional processing in regions of the dorsal attentional network (e.g., the frontal eye fields) or is completely right lateralized during attentional processing. In this review, we examine both functional neuroimaging work on TPJ in the attentional literature as well as anatomical findings. We first critically evaluate the idea that TPJ reorients attention and is right lateralized; we then suggest that TPJ signals might rather reflect post-perceptual processes involved in contextual updating and adjustments of top-down expectations; and then finally discuss how these ideas relate to the electrophysiological (P300) literature, and to TPJ findings in other cognitive and social domains. We conclude that while much work is needed to define the computational functions of regions encapsulated as TPJ, there is now substantial evidence that it is not specialized for stimulus-driven attentional reorienting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.08.010

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changing the task relevance of salient information between runs engages attentional reorienting or task-context updating, which involves ventral attention network regions including right inferior parietal lobule and right inferior frontal gyrus.

    “manipulation of task-relevance of salient information between the two runs taps attentional reorienting (Corbetta & Shulman, 2002) or updating of task context (Geng & Vossel, 2013), which engages ventral attention network regions of right inferior parietal lobule (rIPL) and right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG).”

    From Data‐driven identification of subtypes of executive function across typical development, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and autism spectrum disorders (2020) · cites this paper as Geng & Vossel, 2013

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Comparing the two runs permits testing an anatomical hypothesis about flexibility of attentional modulation derived from attention network theory.

    “contrasting the two runs allows for testing anatomical hypothesis about flexibility of attentional modulation from attention network theory”

    From Data‐driven identification of subtypes of executive function across typical development, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and autism spectrum disorders (2020) · cites this paper as Geng & Vossel, 2013

  • The application of contextual updating to attention reorienting and Theory of Mind was proposed in Geng and Vossel's review.

    “The application of contextual updating to attention reorienting and Theory of Mind was proposed in their review.”

    From Functional Heterogeneity and Convergence in the Right Temporoparietal Junction (2016) · cites this paper as Geng and Vossel 2013

  • Contextual updating, as proposed by Geng and Vossel (2013), could be one such process.

    “Contextual updating, as proposed by Geng and Vossel (2013), could be one such process.”

    From Functional Heterogeneity and Convergence in the Right Temporoparietal Junction (2016) · cites this paper as Geng and Vossel 2013

  • Even if the region of overlap performs a common function such as contextual updating, the pattern of the input to or output from this region could be different depending on the task being performed.

    “Even if the region of overlap performs a common function such as contextual updating, the pattern of the input to or output from this region could be different depending on the task being performed (Cabeza et al. 2011;Cabeza et al. 2012;Geng and Vossel 2013).”

    From Functional Heterogeneity and Convergence in the Right Temporoparietal Junction (2016) · cites this paper as Geng and Vossel 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 131

  1. Amunts K. Schleicher a Zilles K. Cytoarchitecture of the cerebral cortex—more than localization NeuroImage 37 2007 1061 1065 discussion 1066–1068 17870622
  2. Anticevic A. Repovs G. Shulman G.L. Barch D.M. When less is more: TPJ and default network deactivation during encoding predicts working memory performance NeuroImage 49 2010 2638 2648 19913622 PMC3226712
  3. Arrington C.M. Carr T.H. Mayer a R. Rao S.M. Neural mechanisms of visual attention: object-based selection of a region in space J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12 Suppl. 2 2000 106 117 11506651
  4. Asplund C.L. Todd J.J. Snyder A.P. Marois R. A central role for the lateral prefrontal cortex in goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention Nat. Neurosci. 13 2010 507 512 20208526 PMC2847024
  5. Astafiev S.V. Shulman G.L. Corbetta M. Visuospatial reorienting signals in the human temporo-parietal junction are independent of response selection Eur. J. Neurosci. 23 2006 591 596 16420468
  6. Bardi L. Kanai R. Mapelli D. Walsh V. TMS of the FEF interferes with spatial conflict J. Cogn. Neurosci. 24 2012 1305 1313 22401287
  7. Behrmann M. Geng J.J. Shomstein S. Parietal cortex and attention Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14 2004 212 217 15082327
  8. Berryhill M.E. Phuong L. Picasso L. Cabeza R. Olson I.R. Parietal lobe and episodic memory: bilateral damage causes impaired free recall of autobiographical memory J. Neurosci. 27 2007 14415 14423 18160649 PMC6673454
  9. Besle J. Schevon C.A. Mehta A.D. Lakatos P. Goodman R.R. McKhann G.M. Emerson R.G. Schroeder C.E. Tuning of the human neocortex to the temporal dynamics of attended events J. Neurosci. 31 2011 3176 3185 21368029 PMC3081726
  10. Bledowski C. Prvulovic D. Goebel R. Zanella F.E. Linden D.E.J. Attentional systems in target and distractor processing: a combined ERP and fMRI study NeuroImage 22 2004 530 540 15193581
  11. Bledowski C. Prvulovic D. Hoechstetter K. Scherg M. Wibral M. Goebel R. Linden D.E.J. Localizing P300 generators in visual target and distractor processing: a combined event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study J. Neurosci. 24 2004 9353 9360 15496671 PMC6730097
  12. Bzdok D. Langner R. Schilbach L. Jakobs O. Roski C. Caspers S. Laird A.R. Fox P.T. Zilles K. Eickhoff S.B. Characterization of the temporo-parietal junction by combining data-driven parcellation, complementary connectivity analyses, and functional decoding NeuroImage 81 2013 381 392 23689016 PMC4791053
  13. Cabeza R. Ciaramelli E. Olson I.R. Moscovitch M. The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9 2008 613 625 18641668 PMC2692883
  14. Chambers C.D. Payne J.M. Stokes M.G. Mattingley J.B. Fast and slow parietal pathways mediate spatial attention Nat. Neurosci. 7 2004 217 218 14983182
  15. Chambers C.D. Stokes M.G. Mattingley J.B. Modality-specific control of strategic spatial attention in parietal cortex Neuron 44 2004 925 930 15603736
  16. Chang C.-F. Hsu T.-Y. Tseng P. Liang W.-K. Tzeng O.J.L. Hung D.L. Juan C.-H.H. Right temporoparietal junction and attentional reorienting Hum. Brain Mapp. 24 2012 869 877 22419442 PMC6870429
  17. Ciaramelli E. Grady C.L. Moscovitch M. Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: a hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval Neuropsychologia 46 2008 1828 1851 18471837
  18. Cohen A.L. Fair D.A. Dosenbach N.U.F. Miezin F.M. Dierker D. Van Essen D.C. Schlaggar B.L. Petersen S.E. Defining functional areas in individual human brains using resting functional connectivity MRI NeuroImage 41 2008 45 57 18367410 PMC2705206
  19. Constantinidis C. Steinmetz M.A. Neuronal responses in area 7a to multiple-stimulus displays. I. Neurons encode the location of the salient stimulus Cereb. Cortex 11 2001 592 597 11415960
  20. Corbetta M. Patel G.H. Shulman G.L. The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind Neuron 58 2008 306 324 18466742 PMC2441869
  21. Davidson P.S.R. Anaki D. Ciaramelli E. Cohn M. Kim A.S.N. Murphy K.J. Troyer A.K. Moscovitch M. Levine B. Does lateral parietal cortex support episodic memory? Evidence from focal lesion patients Neuropsychologia 46 2008 1743 1755 18313699 PMC2806230
  22. Decety J. Lamm C. The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: how low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition Neuroscientist 13 2007 580 593 17911216
  23. Decety J. Lamm C. The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: how low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition Neuroscientist 13 2007 580 593 17911216
  24. Desmurget M. Sirigu A. A parietal-premotor network for movement intention and motor awareness Trends Cogn. Sci. 13 2009 411 419 19748304
  25. DiQuattro N.E. Geng J.J. Contextual knowledge configures attentional control networks J. Neurosci. 31 2011 18026 18035 22159116 PMC6634143
  26. DiQuattro N.E. Sawaki R. Geng J.J. Effective connectivity during feature-based attentional capture: evidence against the attentional reorienting hypothesis of TPJ Cereb. Cortex 2013 23825319
  27. Donchin E. Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!… Surprise? Psychophysiology 18 1981 493 513 7280146
  28. Doricchi F. Macci E. Silvetti M. Macaluso E. Neural correlates of the spatial and expectancy components of endogenous and stimulus-driven orienting of attention in the Posner task Cereb. Cortex 20 2010 1574 1585 19846472
  29. Downar J. Crawley a P. Mikulis D.J. Davis K.D. The effect of task relevance on the cortical response to changes in visual and auditory stimuli: an event-related fMRI study NeuroImage 14 2001 1256 1267 11707082
  30. Downar J. Crawley A.P. Mikulis D.J. Davis K.D. A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities J. Neurophysiol. 87 2002 615 620 11784775
  31. Eickhoff S.B. Stephan K.E. Mohlberg H. Grefkes C. Fink G.R. Amunts K. Zilles K. A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data NeuroImage 25 4 2005 1325 1335 15850749
  32. Eickhoff S.B. Pomjanski W. Jakobs O. Zilles K. Langner R. Neural correlates of developing and adapting behavioral biases in speeded choice reactions—an fMRI study on predictive motor coding Cereb. Cortex (New York, NY: 1991) 21 2011 1178 1191 20956614
  33. Ellison A. Schindler I. Pattison L.L. Milner A.D. An exploration of the role of the superior temporal gyrus in visual search and spatial perception using TMS Brain 127 2004 2307 2315 15292055
  34. Eshel N. Ruff C.C. Spitzer B. Blankenburg F. Driver J. Effects of parietal TMS on somatosensory judgments challenge interhemispheric rivalry accounts Neuropsychologia 48 12 2010 3470 3481 20678510 PMC2956832
  35. Fodor J.A. The Modularity of Mind 1983 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
  36. Fox M.D. Snyder A.Z. Vincent J.L. Corbetta M. Van Essen D.C. Raichle M.E. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102 2005 9673 9678 15976020 PMC1157105
  37. Frank D.W. Sabatinelli D. Stimulus-driven reorienting in the ventral frontoparietal attention network: the role of emotional content Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6 2012 116 22557960 PMC3340946
  38. Friedrich F.J. Egly R. Rafal R.D. Beck D. Spatial attention deficits in humans: a comparison of superior parietal and temporal-parietal junction lesions Neuropsychology 12 1998 193 207 9556766
  39. Friston K. Prediction, perception and agency Int. J. Psychophysiol. 83 2012 248 252 22178504 PMC3314993
  40. Gandhi S.P. Heeger D.J. Boynton G.M. Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96 1999 3314 3319 10077681 PMC15939
  41. Geng J.J. Mangun G.R. Anterior intraparietal sulcus is sensitive to bottom-up attention driven by stimulus salience J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21 2009 1584 1601 18752405
  42. Geng J.J. Mangun G.R. Right temporoparietal junction activation by a salient contextual cue facilitates target discrimination NeuroImage 54 2011 594 601 20728548 PMC2993878
  43. Gillebert C.R. Mantini D. Peeters R. Dupont P. Vandenberghe R. Cytoarchitectonic mapping of attentional selection and reorienting in parietal cortex NeuroImage 2012 23201362
  44. Goldberg M.E. Bisley J.W. Powell K.D. Gottlieb J. Saccades, salience and attention: the role of the lateral intraparietal area in visual behavior Prog. Brain Res. 155 2006 157 175 17027387 PMC3615538
  45. Gottlieb J. From thought to action: the parietal cortex as a bridge between perception, action, and cognition Neuron 53 2007 9 16 17196526
  46. Graziano M.S.A. Kastner S. Human consciousness and its relationship to social neuroscience: a novel hypothesis Cogn. Neurosci. 2 2011 98 113 22121395 PMC3223025
  47. Grefkes C. Fink G.R. The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys J. Anat. 207 2005 3 17 16011542 PMC1571496
  48. Hahn B. Ross T.J. Stein E. A neuroanatomical dissociation between bottom-up and top-down processes of visuospatial selective attention NeuroImage 32 2006 842 853 16757180 PMC2652125
  49. Halligan P.W. Fink G.R. Marshall J.C. Vallar G. Spatial cognition: evidence from visual neglect Trends Cogn. Sci. 7 2003 125 133 12639694
  50. Heilman K.M. Watson R.T. Valenstein E. Neglect and related disorders Heillman K.M. Valenstein E. Clinical Neuropsychology 5th ed. 2012 Oxford University Press 296 348
  51. Hein G. Knight R.T. Superior temporal sulcus—it's my area: or is it? J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20 2008 2125 2136 18457502
  52. Hickey C. Di Lollo V. McDonald J.J. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21 2009 760 775 18564048
  53. Huettel S.A. Mack P.B. McCarthy G. Perceiving patterns in random series: dynamic processing of sequence in prefrontal cortex Nat. Neurosci. 5 2002 485 490 11941373
  54. Husain M. Nachev P. Space and the parietal cortex Trends Cogn. Sci. 11 2007 30 36 17134935 PMC2323620
  55. Hutchinson J.B. Uncapher M.R. Weiner K.S. Bressler D.W. Silver M.A. Preston A.R. Wagner A.D. Functional heterogeneity in posterior parietal cortex across attention and episodic memory retrieval Cereb. Cortex (New York, NY: 1991) 2012 PMC3862264 23019246
  56. Indovina I. Macaluso E. Dissociation of stimulus relevance and saliency factors during shifts of visuospatial attention Cereb. Cortex 17 2007 1701 1711 17003078
  57. Ionta S. Heydrich L. Lenggenhager B. Mouthon M. Fornari E. Chapuis D. Gassert R. Blanke O. Multisensory mechanisms in temporo-parietal cortex support self-location and first-person perspective Neuron 70 2011 363 374 21521620
  58. Jakobs O. Langner R. Caspers S. Roski C. Cieslik E.C. Zilles K. Laird A.R. Fox P.T. Eickhoff S.B. Across-study and within-subject functional connectivity of a right temporo-parietal junction subregion involved in stimulus-context integration NeuroImage 60 2012 2389 2398 22387170 PMC3321133
  59. Johnson R. Donchin E. P300 and stimulus categorization: two plus one is not so different from one plus one Psychophysiology 17 1980 167 178 7375618
  60. Juan C.-H.H. Muggleton N.G. Tzeng O.J. Hung D.L. Cowey A. Walsh V. Segregation of visual selection and saccades in human frontal eye fields Cereb. Cortex 18 2008 2410 2415 18326522 PMC2536703
  61. Juan C-HH Shorter-Jacobi S.M. Schall J.D. Dissociation of spatial attention and saccade preparation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 2004 15541 15544 15489272 PMC524443
  62. Karnath H.-O. New insights into the functions of the superior temporal cortex Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2 2001 568 576 11484000
  63. Karnath H.-O. Milner D.A. Vallar G. The Cognitive and Neural Bases of Spatial Neglect 1st ed. 2003 Oxford University Press New York
  64. Kinsbourne M. Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry Adv. Neurol. 18 1977 41 49 920524
  65. Knight R.T. Scabini D. Woods D.L. Clayworth C.C. Contributions of temporal-parietal junction to the human auditory P3 Brain Res. 502 1989 109 116 2819449
  66. Kubit B. Jack A.I. Rethinking the role of the rTPJ in attention and social cognition in light of the opposing domains hypothesis: findings from an ALE-based meta-analysis and resting-state functional connectivity Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013 PMC3707078 23847497
  67. Linden D.E.J. Prvulovic D. Formisano E. Völlinger M. Zanella F.E. Goebel R. Dierks T. The functional neuroanatomy of target detection: an fMRI study of visual and auditory oddball tasks Cereb. Cortex (New York, NY: 1991) 9 1999 815 823 10601000
  68. Linden D.E.J. Prvulovic D. Formisano E. Vollinger M. Zanella F.E. Goebel R. Dierks T. Völlinger M. The functional neuroanatomy of target detection: an fMRI study of visual and auditory oddball tasks Cereb. Cortex 9 1999 815 823 10601000
  69. Lovejoy L.P. Krauzlis R.J. Inactivation of primate superior colliculus impairs covert selection of signals for perceptual judgments Nat. Neurosci. 13 2010 261 266 20023651 PMC3412590
  70. Luck S.J. An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique 1st ed. 2005 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
  71. Luck S.J. Ford M. On the role of selective attention in visual perception Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95 1998 830 835 PMC33804 9448247
  72. Maguire A.M. Ogden J. A MRI brain scan analyses and neuropsychological profiles of nine patients with persisting unilateral neglect Neuropsychologia 40 2002 879 887 11900739
  73. Mars R.B. Jbabdi S. Sallet J. O’Reilly J.X. Croxson P.L. Olivier E. Noonan M.P. Bergmann C. Mitchell A.S. Baxter M.G. Behrens T.E.J. Johansen-Berg H. Tomassini V. Miller K.L. Rushworth M.F.S. Diffusion-weighted imaging tractography-based parcellation of the human parietal cortex and comparison with human and macaque resting-state functional connectivity J. Neurosci. 31 2011 4087 4100 21411650 PMC3091022
  74. Mars R.B. Sallet J. Schüffelgen U. Jbabdi S. Toni I. Rushworth M.F.S. Connectivity-based subdivisions of the human right “temporoparietal junction area”: evidence for different areas participating in different cortical networks Cereb. Cortex 22 2012 1894 1903 21955921
  75. Menon V. Ford J.M. Lim K.O. Glover G.H. Pfefferbaum A. Combined event-related fMRI and EEG evidence for temporal-parietal cortex activation during target detection Neuroreport 8 1997 3029 3037 9331910
  76. Mesulam M.-M.M. Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory Ann. Neurol. 28 1990 597 613 2260847
  77. Mesulam M.-M.M. Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 354 1999 1325 1346 10466154 PMC1692628
  78. Mohler C.W. Goldberg M.E. Wurtz R.H. Visual receptive fields of frontal eye field neurons Brain Res. 61 1973 385 389 4204128
  79. Molenberghs P. Sale M.V. Mattingley J.B. Is there a critical lesion site for unilateral spatial neglect? A meta-analysis using activation likelihood estimation Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6 2012 78 22514528 PMC3322487
  80. Mooshagian E. Kaplan J. Zaidel E. Iacoboni M. Fast visuomotor processing of redundant targets: the role of the right temporo-parietal junction PLoS One 3 2008 e2348 18523591 PMC2390848
  81. Morelli S.A. Lieberman M.D. The role of automaticity and attention in neural processes underlying empathy for happiness, sadness, and anxiety Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7 2013 160 23658538 PMC3647144
  82. Mort D.J. Malhotra P. Mannan S.K. Rorden C. Pambakian A. Kennard C. Husain M. The anatomy of visual neglect Brain 126 2003 1986 2197 12821519
  83. Natale E. Marzi C.A. Macaluso E. Right temporal-parietal junction engagement during spatial reorienting does not depend on strategic attention control Neuropsychologia 48 2010 1160 1164 19932706
  84. Neggers S.F. Huijbers W. Vrijlandt C.M. Vlaskamp B.N. Schutter D.J. Kenemans J.L. TMS pulses on the frontal eye fields break coupling between visuospatial attention and eye movements J. Neurophysiol. 98 2007 2765 2778 17699696
  85. Nelson S.M. Cohen A.L. Power J.D. Wig G.S. Miezin F.M. Wheeler M.E. Velanova K. Donaldson D.I. Phillips J.S. Schlaggar B.L. Petersen S.E. A parcellation scheme for human left lateral parietal cortex Neuron 67 2010 156 170 20624599 PMC2913443
  86. O'Shea J. Muggleton N.G. Cowey A. Walsh V. Timing of target discrimination in human frontal eye fields J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16 2004 1060 1067 15298792
  87. Oleksiak A. Postma A. van der Ham I.J.M. Klink P.C. van Wezel R.J. A review of lateralization of spatial functioning in nonhuman primates Brain Res. Rev. 67 2011 56 72 21059373
  88. Orban G.A. Claeys K. Nelissen K. Smans R. Sunaert S. Todd J.T. Wardak C. Durand J.-B. Vanduffel W. Mapping the parietal cortex of human and non-human primates Neuropsychologia 44 2006 2647 2667 16343560
  89. Peers P.V. Ludwig C.J.H. Rorden C. Cusack R. Bonfiglioli C. Bundesen C. Driver J. Antoun N. Duncan J. Attentional functions of parietal and frontal cortex Cereb. Cortex (New York, NY: 1991) 15 2005 1469 1484 15689522
  90. Philipp A.M. Weidner R. Koch I. Fink G.R. Differential roles of inferior frontal and inferior parietal cortex in task switching: evidence from stimulus-categorization switching and response-modality switching Hum. Brain Mapp. 2012 000 PMC6870067 22438215
  91. Polich J. Theoretical overview of P3a and P3b Polich J. Detection of Change: Event-related Potential and fMRI 2003 Kluwer Academic Press Boston 83 89
  92. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b Clin. Neurophysiol. 118 2007 2128 2148 17573239 PMC2715154
  93. Posner M.I. Snyder C.R. Davidson B.J. Attention and the detection of signals J. Exp. Psychol. 109 1980 160 174 7381367
  94. Posner M.I. Walker J.A. Friedrich F.J. Rafal R.D. Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention J. Neurosci. 4 1984 1863 1874 6737043 PMC6564871
  95. Ringman J.M. Saver J.L. Woolson R.F. Clarke W.R. Adams H.P. Frequency, risk factors, anatomy, and course of unilateral neglect in an acute stroke cohort Neurology 63 3 2004 468 474 15304577
  96. Ristic J. Giesbrecht B. Electrophysiological evidence for spatiotemporal flexibility in the ventrolateral attention network PLoS One 6 2011 e24436 21931715 PMC3171448
  97. Rosen A.C. Rao S.M. Caffarra P. Scaglioni A. Bobholz J.A. Woodley S.J. Hammeke T.A. Cunningham J.M. Prieto T.E. Binder J.R. Neural basis of endogenous and exogenous spatial orienting. A functional MRI study J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11 1999 135 152 10198130
  98. Rushworth M.F.S. Behrens T.E.J. Johansen-Berg H. Connection patterns distinguish 3 regions of human parietal cortex Cereb. Cortex 16 2006 1418 1430 16306320
  99. Santiesteban I. Banissy M.J. Catmur C. Bird G. Enhancing social ability by stimulating right temporoparietal junction Curr. Biol. 22 2012 2274 2277 23122848
  100. Sawaki R. Geng J.J. Luck S.J. A common neural mechanism for preventing and terminating the allocation of attention J. Neurosci. 32 2012 10725 10736 22855820 PMC3488698
  101. Saxe R. Uniquely human social cognition Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 16 2006 235 239 16546372
  102. Schall J.D. On the role of frontal eye field in guiding attention and saccades Vis. Res. 44 2004 1453 1467 15066404
  103. Schindler I. Ellison A. Milner A.D. Contralateral visual search deficits following TMS J. Neuropsychol. 2 2008 501 508 19824173
  104. Schmahmann J.D. Pandya D.N. Wang R. Dai G. D’Arceuil H.E. de Crespigny A.J. Wedeen V.J. Association fibre pathways of the brain: parallel observations from diffusion spectrum imaging and autoradiography Brain 130 2007 630 653 17293361
  105. Seghier M.L. The angular gyrus: multiple functions and multiple subdivisions Neuroscientist 19 2013 43 61 22547530 PMC4107834
  106. Sereno M.I. Dale a M. Reppas J.B. Kwong K.K. Belliveau J.W. Brady T.J. Rosen B.R. Tootell R.B. Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging Science (New York, NY) 268 1995 889 893 7754376
  107. Shomstein S. Cognitive functions of the posterior parietal cortex: top-down and bottom-up attentional control Front. Integr. Neurosci. 6 2012 38 22783174 PMC3389368
  108. Shulman G.L. Astafiev S.V. Franke D. Pope D.L.W. Snyder A.Z. McAvoy M.P. Corbetta M. Interaction of stimulus-driven reorienting and expectation in ventral and dorsal frontoparietal and basal ganglia-cortical networks J. Neurosci. 29 2009 4392 4407 19357267 PMC2743562
  109. Shulman G.L. Astafiev S.V. McAvoy M.P. D’Avossa G. Corbetta M. Right T.P.J. deactivation during visual search: functional significance and support for a filter hypothesis Cereb. Cortex 17 2007 2625 2633 17264254
  110. Shulman G.L. Pope D.L. Astafiev S.V. McAvoy M.P. Snyder A.Z. Corbetta M. Right hemisphere dominance during spatial selective attention and target detection occurs outside the dorsal frontoparietal network J. Neurosci. 30 2010 3640 3651 20219998 PMC2872555
  111. Soltani M. Knight R. Neural origins of the P300 Crit. Rev. Neurobiol. 14 2000 199 224 12645958
  112. Summerfield C. Egner T. Greene M. Koechlin E. Mangels J. Hirsch J. Predictive codes for forthcoming perception in the frontal cortex Science 314 2006 1311 1314 17124325
  113. Sutton S. Braren M. Zubin J. John E.R. Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty Science 150 1965 1187 1188 5852977
  114. Sutton S. Braren M. Zubin J. John E.R. Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty Science 150 1965 1187 1188 5852977
  115. Thiebaut de Schotten M. Urbanski M. Duffau H. Volle E. Lévy R. Dubois B. Bartolomeo P. Direct evidence for a parietal-frontal pathway subserving spatial awareness in humans Science 309 2005 2226 2228 16195465
  116. Thompson K.G. Hanes D.P. Bichot N.P. Schall J.D. Perceptual and motor processing stages identified in the activity of macaque frontal eye field neurons during visual search J. Neurophysiol. 76 1996 4040 4055 8985899
  117. Treue S. Martinez Trujillo J.C. Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex Nature 399 1999 575 579 10376597
  118. Tsakiris M. Costantini M. Haggard P. The role of the right temporo-parietal junction in maintaining a coherent sense of one's body Neuropsychologia 46 2008 3014 3018 18601939
  119. Tzourio-Mazoyer N. Landeau B. Papathanassiou D. Crivello F. Etard O. Delcroix N. Mazoyer B. Joliot M. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain NeuroImage 15 1 2002 273 289 11771995
  120. Uddin L.Q. Supekar K. Amin H. Rykhlevskaia E. Nguyen D.A. Greicius M.D. Menon V. Dissociable connectivity within human angular gyrus and intraparietal sulcus: evidence from functional and structural connectivity Cereb. Cortex 20 2010 2636 2646 20154013 PMC2951845
  121. Vallar G. Perani D. The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man Neuropsychologia 24 1986 609 622 3785649
  122. Van Essen D.C. A Population-Average, Landmark- and Surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex NeuroImage 28 3 2005 635 662 16172003
  123. Vogel E.K. Luck S.J. Shapiro K.L. Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24 1998 1656 1674 9861716
  124. Vossel S. Eschenbeck P. Weiss P.H. Weidner R. Saliger J. Karbe H. Fink G.R. Visual extinction in relation to visuospatial neglect after right-hemispheric stroke: quantitative assessment and statistical lesion-symptom mapping J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 82 2011 862 868 21242287
  125. Vossel S. Thiel C.M. Fink G.R. Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex NeuroImage 32 2006 1257 1264 16846742
  126. Vossel S. Weidner R. Driver J. Friston K.J. Fink G.R. Deconstructing the architecture of dorsal and ventral attention systems with dynamic causal modeling J. Neurosci. 32 2012 10637 10648 22855813 PMC3432566
  127. Vossel S. Weidner R. Thiel C.M. Fink G.R. What is “odd” in Posner's location-cueing paradigm? Neural responses to unexpected location and feature changes compared J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21 2009 30 41 18476756
  128. Vossel S. Weiss P.H. Eschenbeck P. Saliger J. Karbe H. Fink G.R. The neural basis of anosognosia for spatial neglect after stroke Stroke 43 2012 1954 1956 22627992
  129. Wang J. Fan L. Zhang Y. Liu Y. Jiang D. Zhang Y. Yu C. Jiang T. Tractography-based parcellation of the human left inferior parietal lobule NeuroImage 63 2 2012 641 652 22846658
  130. Weidner R. Krummenacher J. Reimann B. Müller H.J. Fink G.R. Sources of top-down control in visual search J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21 2009 2100 2113 19199412
  131. Woodman G.F. Luck S.J. Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search Nature 400 1999 867 869 10476964

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geng, J. J., & Vossel, S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
Geng, Joy J.
ORCID
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
37
Issue
10
Pages
2608-2620
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.08.010
PMC
PMC3878596
OpenAlex
W2028964134
Cited by
411
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (BCS-1230377-0)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Vo 1733/1-1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Keywords
right temporoparietal junction, attentional control, attentional reorienting, top-down expectations, dorsal attention network, frontal eye field, right lateralization, P300, post-perceptual processing, social cognition
MeSH terms
Attention, Humans, Nerve Net, Parietal Lobe, Temporal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review