Cited by 109Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Memory complaints and risk of cognitive impairment after nearly 2 decades among older women

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between subjective memory complaints (SMCs) and long-term risk of cognitive impairment in aging because most previous studies have followed individuals for only a few years. METHODS: Participants were 1,107 cognitively normal, community-dwelling older women (aged 65 years and older at baseline) in a prospective study of aging. SMCs were assessed shortly after baseline and repeatedly over time with the yes/no question, "Do you feel you have more problems with memory than most?" Cognitive status 18 years later (normal or impaired with mild cognitive impairment or dementia) was determined by an expert panel. Using logistic regression, we investigated the association between SMCs over time and risk of cognitive impairment, adjusting for demographics, baseline cognition, and characteristics that differed between those with and without SMCs. RESULTS: At baseline, 8.0% of participants (n = 89) endorsed SMCs. Baseline SMCs were associated with increased risk of cognitive impairment 18 years later (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.8). Results were unchanged after excluding participants with depression. The association between SMCs and cognitive impairment was greatest at the last SMC assessment time point (18 years before diagnosis: adjusted OR = 1.7 [1.1-2.9]; 14 years before diagnosis: adjusted OR = 1.6 [0.9-2.7]; 10 years before diagnosis: adjusted OR = 1.9 [1.1-3.1]; 4 years before diagnosis: adjusted OR = 3.0 [1.8-5.0]). CONCLUSIONS: SMCs are associated with cognitive impairment nearly 2 decades later among older women. SMCs may be a very early symptom of an insidious neurodegenerative disease process, such as Alzheimer disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000002153

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 29 references

3 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Reitan RM. Trail Making Test: Manual for Administration and Scoring. Tucson: Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory; 1992.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 109

Metadata

Authors
Kaup, A. R., Nettiksimmons, J., LeBlanc, E. S., & Yaffe, K.
Affiliations
San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2015-11-24
Volume
85
Issue
21
Pages
1852-1858
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2193383487
Cited by
109
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (IK2 RX001629)
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • University of Minnesota
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG005394, R01AG005407, R01AG027576, K24AG031155, R01AG026720, R01AG027574)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01-AR35582, R01AR035584, R01AR35583, R01AR035582, R01AR035583, R01‐AR‐35584)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
subjective memory complaints, cognitive impairment, older women, long-term risk, mild cognitive impairment, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, aging, early detection of neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Female, Humans, Memory Disorders, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review