The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lesion topographies in multiple sclerosis diagnosis: A reappraisal
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the contributions of cortico-juxtacortical and corpus callosum lesions to multiple sclerosis diagnosis and to compare the value of ≥1 vs ≥3 periventricular lesions in clinically isolated syndromes (CIS). METHODS: Step 1: We evaluated lesion topography classifications in 657 patients with CIS with stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression models considering second attack as the outcome. Step 2: We established 2 dissemination in space (DIS) versions according to the periventricular lesion cutoffs of ≥1 and ≥3 and assessed their performance at 10 years with second attack as the outcome, first individually and then combined with dissemination in time (DIT) in all cases (n = 326), by age, and by CIS topography. RESULTS: Step 1: The models (hazard ratios [95% confidence interval]) favored ≥1 over ≥3 periventricular lesions (2.5 [1.7-3.6]) and cortico-juxtacortical over juxtacortical lesions (1.4 [1.0-1.8]). Callosal lesions were not selected. Step 2: DIS specificity with ≥1 periventricular lesions was slightly lower than with ≥3 (59.1 vs 61.4) and the same after adding DIT (88.6). Regarding age, ≥3 periventricular lesions improved DIS specificity over ≥1 lesions in the 40-49 years of age bracket (66.7 vs 58.3). This difference disappeared when adding DIT (83.3). Optic neuritis had a similar pattern when evaluating CIS topographies. CONCLUSIONS: Our results comply with the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis (MAGNIMS) consensus recommendation of combining cortical and juxtacortical lesions into a single term when possible. Concerning periventricular lesions, maintaining the current ≥1 cutoff in the McDonald criteria does not compromise specificity in typical CIS cases, but attention should be paid to older patients or optic neuritis cases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The visual system often provides an early and eloquent clinical sign of MS. 81”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria (2018) · cites this paper as [81]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intracortical lesions: Relevance for new MRI diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis
Filippi, M., Rocca, M. A., Calabrese, M., Sormani, M. P., Rinaldi, F., Perini, P., Comi, G., & Gallo, P. (2010) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181ff96f6 · Cited by 172
Garg, N., Reddel, S. W., Miller, D. H., Chataway, J., Riminton, D. S., Barnett, Y., Masters, L., Barnett, M. H., & Hardy, T. A. (2015) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2014-309649 · Cited by 76
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00393-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181feb26f · DOI
- Arrambide G Rovira A Sastre-Garriga J et al. Spinal cord lesions: a modest contributor to diagnosis in clinically isolated syndromes but a relevant prognostic factor. Mult Scler Epub 2017 Mar 1. · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458516667565 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820a0cc4 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/120.11.2059 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/brain/awv105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70176-X · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.22366 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003144 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002975 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c3fccf · DOI
- Hyun JW Huh SY Kim W et al. Evaluation of the 2016 MAGNIMS MRI criteria for dissemination in space in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome. Mult Scler Epub 2017 May 1. · DOI
- 10.2214/ajr.146.3.443 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.20363 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria
Thompson, A. J., Banwell, B. L., Barkhof, F., Carroll, W. M., Coetzee, T., Comi, G., Correale, J., Fazekas, F., Filippi, M., Freedman, M. S., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30470-2 · Cited by 8,167
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Arrambide, G., Tintore, M., Auger, C., Río, J., Castilló, J., Vidal-Jordana, A., Galán, I., Nos, C., Comabella, M., Mitjana, R., Mulero, P., de Barros, A., Rodríguez-Acevedo, B., Midaglia, L., Sastre-Garriga, J., Rovira, A., & Montalban, X.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- From Servei de Neurologia–Neuroimmunologia, Centre d’Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (CEMCAT) (G.A., M.T., J.R., J.C., A.V.-J., I.G., C.N., M.C., P.M., B.R.-A., L.M., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (IDI) (C.A., R.M., A.d.B., A.R.), Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; and Division of Neurology (X.M.), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2017-12-05
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 2351-2356
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- PMC
- PMC5719929
- OpenAlex
- W2765498798
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Sanofi
- Biogen
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
- Celgene
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
- Siemens
- Oryzon Genomics
- Fundació Institut de Recerca Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI14/01439)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis diagnosis, lesion topography, clinically isolated syndrome, periventricular lesions, corpus callosum lesions, dissemination in space, dissemination in time, optic neuritis, McDonald criteria
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Cerebral Ventricles, Corpus Callosum, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Optic Neuritis, Cohort Studies, Age of Onset
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lesion topographies in multiple sclerosis diagnosis: A reappraisal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.0000000000004715
- The paper
- Arrambide, G., Tintore, M., Auger, C., Río, J., Castilló, J., Vidal-Jordana, A., Galán, I., Nos, C., Comabella, M., Mitjana, R., Mulero, P., de Barros, A., Rodríguez-Acevedo, B., Midaglia, L., Sastre-Garriga, J., Rovira, A., & Montalban, X. (2017). Lesion topographies in multiple sclerosis diagnosis: A reappraisal. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000004715