Cited by 252Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Progression of language decline and cortical atrophy in subtypes of primary progressive aphasia

Open access
Rogalski, E., Cobia, D., Harrison, T.M., Wieneke, C., Weintraub, S., Mesulam, M.-M.·2011·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the longitudinal course of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) over a 2-year period and to offer quantitative ranges of expected change that could be used to guide the design and evaluation of therapeutic intervention trials. METHODS: Regional changes of cortical thickness and whole-brain cortical volume loss as well as neuropsychological language performance were assessed at baseline and 2 years later in 13 rigorously characterized patients who fulfilled research criteria for logopenic, agrammatic, and semantic PPA subtypes (6 PPA-L, 3 PPA-G, and 4 PPA-S). RESULTS: There was substantial progression of clinical deficits and cortical atrophy over 2 years. Neuropsychological language performance patterns lost the sharp distinctions that differentiated one PPA variant from another. Nonetheless, the subtype-specific differential impairment of word comprehension vs grammatical processing was largely maintained. Peak atrophy sites spread beyond the initial distinctive locations that characterized each of the 3 subtypes and displayed a more convergent distribution encompassing all 3 major components of the language network: the inferior frontal gyrus, the temporoparietal junction, and lateral temporal cortex. Despite the progression, overall peak atrophy remained lateralized to the left hemisphere. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the unique features, which sharply differentiate the PPA variants at the early to middle stages, may lose their distinctiveness as the degeneration becomes more severe. Given the substantial atrophy over 2 years, PPA clinical trials may require fewer patients and shorter study durations than Alzheimer disease trials to detect significant therapeutic effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0b013e31821ccd3c

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]21. Weintraub S, Rubin NP, Mesulam MM. Primary pro- gressive aphasia: longitudinal course, neuropsychologi- cal profile, and language features. Arch Neurol 1990;47: 1329 -1335.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogalski, E., Cobia, D., Harrison, T. M., Wieneke, C., Weintraub, S., & Mesulam, M.-M.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • From the Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease Center (E.R., T.M.H., C.W., S.W., M.-M.M.), Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (D.C., S.W.), and Department of Neurology (M.-M.M.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2011-05-24
Volume
76
Issue
21
Pages
1804-1810
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2130888418
Cited by
252
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 8
FWCI
11.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Northwestern University (AG13854)
  • University of Oxford
  • National Institutes of Health (5kl2rr025740-02, DC008552, AG13854)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG13854, 5KL2RR025740, P30AG013854)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (AG13854, 5KL2RR025740, R01DC008552, DC008552)
  • National Center for Research Resources (5KL2RR025740, AG13854, UL1RR025741)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
primary progressive aphasia, logopenic variant, semantic variant, cortical atrophy, cortical thickness, language loss, longitudinal disease progression, word comprehension, grammatical processing, language network, inferior frontal gyrus, temporoparietal junction, lateral temporal cortex, left hemisphere lateralization, clinical trial design
MeSH terms
Aged, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Language Disorders, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Disease Progression, Aphasia, Primary Progressive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review