Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accumulation of hypointense lesions ("black holes") on T 1 spin-echo MRI correlates with disease progression in multiple sclerosis

Truyen, L., van Waesberghe, J. H.T.M., van Walderveen, M.A.A., van Oosten, B. W., Polman, C. H., Hommes, O. R., Ader, H. J.A., Barkhof, F.·1996·Neurology

Abstract

MRI findings are increasingly used as outcome measures in therapeutic trials in MS. The discrepancy between the extent of the lesions on conventional T2 images and the clinical condition of the patient is one of the problems encountered in such studies. This clinical-radiological paradox prevents the use of MRI data as surrogate markers of disability in MS. A recent pilot study suggested a relationship between hypointense lesions on T1 MRI and disability. To assess in more detail the correlation of changes in hypointense lesion load on T1-weighted spin-echo MR images ("black holes") with changes in disability in MS, we studied 46 patients with clinically definite MS at baseline and after a median follow-up of 40 months. There was a significant correlation between baseline disability and hypointense lesion load (Spearman rank correlation coefficient [SRCC] = 0.46, p = 0.001). In secondary progressive patients, the rate of accumulation of these "black holes" was significantly related to progression rate (SRCC = 0.81, p < 0.0001). We speculate that the appearance of hypointense lesions is the MRI equivalent of a failure of remission. Overall, T1 lesion load measurements correlated better with clinical assessments than T2 lesion load measurements. Quantification of hypointense lesion load on T1-weighted spin-echo MRI helps to resolve the clinical-radiological paradox between disability and MRI and has the potential to be a surrogate marker of disability in MS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.47.6.1469

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Truyen, L., van Waesberghe, J. H. T. M., van Walderveen, M. A. A., van Oosten, B. W., Polman, C. H., Hommes, O. R., Ader, H. J. A., & Barkhof, F.
Venue
Neurology
Published
1996-12
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
1469-1476
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2023180387
Cited by
462
References
17
FWCI
16.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accumulation of hypointense lesions ("black holes") on T 1 spin-echo MRI correlates with disease progression in multiple sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.47.6.1469
The paper
Truyen, L., van Waesberghe, J. H. T. M., van Walderveen, M. A. A., van Oosten, B. W., Polman, C. H., Hommes, O. R., Ader, H. J. A., & Barkhof, F. (1996). Accumulation of hypointense lesions ("black holes") on T 1 spin-echo MRI correlates with disease progression in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.47.6.1469

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.