The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interpretable classifiers using rules and Bayesian analysis: Building a better stroke prediction model
Open accessAbstract
We aim to produce predictive models that are not only accurate, but are also interpretable to human experts. Our models are decision lists, which consist of a series of if…then…statements (e.g., if high blood pressure, then stroke) that discretize a high-dimensional, multivariate feature space into a series of simple, readily interpretable decision statements. We introduce a generative model called Bayesian Rule Lists that yields a posterior distribution over possible decision lists. It employs a novel prior structure to encourage sparsity. Our experiments show that Bayesian Rule Lists has predictive accuracy on par with the current top algorithms for prediction in machine learning. Our method is motivated by recent developments in personalized medicine, and can be used to produce highly accurate and interpretable medical scoring systems. We demonstrate this by producing an alternative to the CHADS$_{2}$ score, actively used in clinical practice for estimating the risk of stroke in patients that have atrial fibrillation. Our model is as interpretable as CHADS$_{2}$, but more accurate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To this end, they propose Bayesian Rule Lists (BRL) f to extract the comprehensible global predictor c g as a decision list . A decision list consists of a series of if-then statements discretizing the whole feature space into a set of simple and directly interpretable decision statements.”
From A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models (2019) · cites this paper as [57]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Asuncion, A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24,190
Classification and Regression Trees.
Gordon, A. D., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530946 · Cited by 23,867
Classification and Regression Trees.
Ryzin, J. V., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288003 · Cited by 21,030
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,559
Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences
Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177011136 · Cited by 16,627
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Letham, B., Rudin, C., McCormick, T. H. and Madigan, D. (2015). Supplement to “Interpretable classifiers using rules and Bayesian analysis: Building a better stroke prediction model.” DOI:10.1214/15-AOAS848SUPPA, DOI:10.1214/15-AOAS848SUPPB. · DOI
- Letham, B., Rudin, C., McCormick, T. H. and Madigan, D. (2014). An interpretable model for stroke prediction using rules and Bayesian analysis. In Proceedings of 2014 KDD Workshop on Data Science for Social Good. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
- Quinlan, J. R. (1993). C 4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo.
- Rudin, C. and Ertekin, Ş. (2015). Learning optimized lists of classification rules. Technical report, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778 · Cited by 17,555
Barredo Arrieta, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., Garcia, S., Gil-Lopez, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., et al. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 · Cited by 10,423
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2870052 · Cited by 6,294
“[66] proposed a model called Bayesian Rule Lists (BRL) based on decision tree, the authors claimed that preliminary interpretable models provide a concise and convincing capabilities to gain domain experts trust.”
BackgroundMethods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks
Montavon, G., Samek, W., & Müller, K.-R. (2018) · Digital Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.dsp.2017.10.011 · Cited by 2,665
A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Toward Medical XAI
Tjoa, E., & Guan, C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2020.3027314 · Cited by 2,524
Definitions, methods, and applications in interpretable machine learning
Murdoch, W. J., Singh, C., Kumbier, K., Abbasi-Asl, R., & Yu, B. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1900654116 · Cited by 2,167
“In order to construct a model that has high predictive and descriptive accuracy, (39) introduce a method for learning lists of if-then rules that are predictive of one year stroke risk.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAnchors: High-Precision Model-Agnostic Explanations
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11491 · Cited by 2,162
“A number of approaches construct globally interpretable models, many based on rules (Lakkaraju, Bach, and Leskovec 2016; Letham et al. 2015; Wang and Rudin 2015; Wang et al. 2015).”
BackgroundInterpreting Black-Box Models: A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Hassija, V., Chamola, V., Mahapatra, A., Singal, A., Goel, D., Huang, K., Scardapane, S., Spinelli, I., Mahmud, M., & Hussain, A. (2024) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-023-10179-8 · Cited by 2,495
“Letham et al. [126] proposed a model called Bayesian Rule Lists (BRL), which is based on decision trees as mentioned in [127].”
MethodInvestigating Ad Transparency Mechanisms in Social Media: A Case Study of Facebook's Explanations
Andreou, A., Venkatadri, G., Goga, O., Gummadi, K. P., Loiseau, P., & Mislove, A. E. (2018) · Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2018.23191 · Cited by 1,505
DARPA's Explainable Artificial Intelligence Program
Gunning, D., & Aha, D. W. (2019) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v40i2.2850 · Cited by 1,360
KING, G., PAN, J., & ROBERTS, M. E. (2017) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055417000144 · Cited by 1,028
A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learning
Burkart, N., & Huber, M. F. (2021) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.12228 · Cited by 1,008
Next-Generation Machine Learning for Biological Networks
Camacho, D. M., Collins, K. M., Powers, R. K., Costello, J. C., & Collins, J. J. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.015 · Cited by 1,012
Interpretable machine learning: Fundamental principles and 10 grand challenges
Rudin, C., Chen, C., Chen, Z., Huang, H., Semenova, L., & Zhong, C. (2022) · Statistics Surveys · doi:10.1214/21-ss133 · Cited by 958
Self-citationDesigning Theory-Driven User-Centric Explainable AI
Wang, D., Yang, Q., Abdul, A., & Lim, B. Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300831 · Cited by 906
Rationalizing Neural Predictions
Lei, T., Barzilay, R., & Jaakkola, T. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1011 · Cited by 777
Shneiderman, B. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3419764 · Cited by 768
Accountability in algorithmic decision making
Diakopoulos, N. (2016) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2844110 · Cited by 763
Abdul, A., Vermeulen, J., Wang, D., Lim, B. Y., & Kankanhalli, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174156 · Cited by 743
Yang, G., Ye, Q., & Xia, J. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.07.016 · Cited by 717
Datta, A., Sen, S., & Zick, Y. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2016.42 · Cited by 728
Interpretable Decision Sets: A Joint Framework for Description and Prediction
Lakkaraju, H., Bach, S. H., & Leskovec, J. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939874 · Cited by 687
What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?
Holzinger, A., Biemann, C., Pattichis, C. S., & Kell, D. B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.09923 · Cited by 636
Interpretable Machine Learning – A Brief History, State-of-the-Art and Challenges
Molnar, C., Casalicchio, G., & Bischl, B. (2020) · Communications in Computer and Information Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65965-3_28 · Cited by 677
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · arXiv
A Multidisciplinary Survey and Framework for Design and Evaluation of Explainable AI Systems
Mohseni, S., Zarei, N., & Ragan, E. D. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3387166 · Cited by 785
Explainable AI for Healthcare 5.0: Opportunities and Challenges
Saraswat, D., Bhattacharya, P., Verma, A., Prasad, V. K., Tanwar, S., Sharma, G., Bokoro, P. N., & Sharma, R. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3197671 · Cited by 609
SoK: Security and Privacy in Machine Learning
Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Sinha, A., & Wellman, M. P. (2018) · 2018 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P) · doi:10.1109/eurosp.2018.00035 · Cited by 502
Society-in-the-loop: programming the algorithmic social contract
Rahwan, I. (2018) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-017-9430-8 · Cited by 553
SoK: Towards the Science of security and privacy in machine learning
Papernot, N., McDaniel, P. D., Sinha, A., & Wellman, M. P. (2018) · Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) · Cited by 427
Towards better analysis of machine learning models: A visual analytics perspective
Liu, S., Wang, X., Liu, M., & Zhu, J. (2017) · Visual Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.visinf.2017.01.006 · Cited by 416
Analysis of Explainers of Black Box Deep Neural Networks for Computer Vision: A Survey
Buhrmester, V., Münch, D., & Arens, M. (2021) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make3040048 · Cited by 403
A Review of Challenges and Opportunities in Machine Learning for Health
Ghassemi, M., Naumann, T., Schulam, P., Beam, A. L., Chen, I. Y., & Ranganath, R. (2018) · PubMed · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.00388 · Cited by 368
Islam, M. R., Ahmed, M. U., Barua, S., & Begum, S. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12031353 · Cited by 366
Benchmarking and survey of explanation methods for black box models
Bodria, F., Giannotti, F., Guidotti, R., Naretto, F., Pedreschi, D., & Rinzivillo, S. (2023) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-023-00933-9 · Cited by 410
Four principles of explainable artificial intelligence
Phillips, P. J., Hahn, C. A., Fontana, P. C., Yates, A. N., Greene, K., Broniatowski, D. A., & Przybocki, M. A. (2021) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8312 · Cited by 262
Faithful and Customizable Explanations of Black Box Models
Lakkaraju, H., Kamar, E. S., Caruana, R., & Leskovec, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3306618.3314229 · Cited by 268
Moustafa, N., Koroniotis, N., Keshk, M., Zomaya, A. Y., & Tari, Z. (2023) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2023.3280465 · Cited by 266
Rulematrix: Visualizing and understanding classifiers with rules
Ming, Y., Qu, H., & Bertini, E. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2018.2864812 · Cited by 243
de Laat, P. B. (2018) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-017-0293-z · Cited by 251
Computer‐Assisted Keyword and Document Set Discovery from Unstructured Text
King, G., Lam, P., & Roberts, M. E. (2017) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12291 · Cited by 216
A survey of visual analytics for Explainable Artificial Intelligence methods
Alicioglu, G., & Sun, B. (2022) · Computers & Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.cag.2021.09.002 · Cited by 221
Explainability in human–agent systems
Rosenfeld, A., & Richardson, A. (2019) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-019-09408-y · Cited by 249
"How do I fool you?": Manipulating User Trust via Misleading Black Box Explanations
Lakkaraju, H., & Bastani, O. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3375627.3375833 · Cited by 241
Human factors in model interpretability: Industry practices, challenges, and needs
Hong, S. R., Hullman, J., & Bertini, E. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3392878 · Cited by 219
The Disagreement Problem in Explainable Machine Learning: A Practitioner's PerspectivePreprint
Krishna, S., Han, T., Gu, A., Jabbari, S., Wu, Z. S., & Lakkaraju, H. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2963888/v1 · Cited by 404
Modern views of machine learning for precision psychiatry
Chen, Z. S., Kulkarni, P., Galatzer‐Levy, I. R., Bigio, B., Nasca, C., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2022.100602 · Cited by 247
A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Healthcare: Why, How, and When?
Bharati, S., Mondal, M. R. H., & Podder, P. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2023.3266418 · Cited by 251
Nasarian, E., Alizadehsani, R., Acharya, U. R., & Tsui, K.-L. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102412 · Cited by 207
Post-hoc vs ante-hoc explanations: xAI design guidelines for data scientists
Retzlaff, C. O., Angerschmid, A., Saranti, A., Schneeberger, D. M., Röttger, R., Müller, H., & Holzinger, A. (2024) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2024.101243 · Cited by 229
A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models
Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Ruggieri, S., Turini, F., Giannotti, F., & Pedreschi, D. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3236009 · Cited by 629
Explainable AI for Bioinformatics: Methods, Tools and Applications
Karim, M. R., Islam, T., Shajalal, M., Beyan, O., Lange, C., Cochez, M., Rebholz‐Schuhmann, D., & Decker, S. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbad236 · Cited by 220
DARPA 's explainable AI ( XAI ) program: A retrospective
Gunning, D., Vorm, E. S., Wang, Y., & Turek, M. (2021) · Applied AI Letters · doi:10.1002/ail2.61 · Cited by 292
Explainable decision forest: Transforming a decision forest into an interpretable tree
Sagi, O., & Rokach, L. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.03.013 · Cited by 189
The Bayesian Case Model: A Generative Approach for Case-Based Reasoning and Prototype Classification
Kim, B., Rudin, C. D., & Shah, J. (2014) · Cited by 193
Self-citationDing, W., Abdel‐Basset, M., Hawash, H., & Ali, A. M. A. (2022) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2022.10.013 · Cited by 214
Towards Reverse-Engineering Black-Box Neural Networks
Oh, S. J., Schiele, B., & Fritz, M. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28954-6_7 · Cited by 291
Comparing sets of patterns with the Jaccard index
Fletcher, S., & Islam, M. Z. (2018) · AJIS. Australasian journal of information systems/AJIS. Australian journal of information systems/Australian journal of information systems · doi:10.3127/ajis.v22i0.1538 · Cited by 183
Hendricks, L. A., Hu, R., Darrell, T., & Akata, Z. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01216-8_17 · Cited by 171
Degas, A., Islam, M. R., Hurter, C., Barua, S., Rahman, H., Poudel, M., Ruscio, D., Ahmed, M. U., Begum, S., Rahman, M. A., et al. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12031295 · Cited by 168
Wani, N. A., Kumar, R., Mamta, ., Bedi, J., & Rida, I. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102472 · Cited by 172
Souillard‐Mandar, W., Davis, R., Rudin, C. D., Au, R., Libon, D. J., Swenson, R. A., Price, C. C., Lamar, M., & Penney, D. L. (2015) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-015-5529-5 · Cited by 163
Self-citationClassification of Explainable Artificial Intelligence Methods through Their Output Formats
Vilone, G., & Longo, L. (2021) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make3030032 · Cited by 182
Explaining deep neural networks: A survey on the global interpretation methods
Saleem, R., Yuan, B., Kurugöllü, F., Anjum, A., & Liu, L. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.09.129 · Cited by 168
The role of explainable AI in the context of the AI Act
Panigutti, C., Hamon, R., Hupont, I., Llorca, D. F., Yela, D. F., Junklewitz, H., Scalzo, S., Mazzini, G., Sánchez, I., Garrido, J. S., et al. (2023) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594069 · Cited by 201
Coordinating Human and Machine Learning for Effective Organizational Learning
Sturm, T., Gerlach, J. P., Pumplun, L., Mesbah, N., Peters, F., Tauchert, C., Nan, N., & Buxmann, P. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/16543 · Cited by 182
Toward Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Precision Pathology
Klauschen, F., Dippel, J., Keyl, P., Jurmeister, P. S., Bockmayr, M. L., Möck, A., Buchstab, O., Alber, M., Ruff, L., Montavon, G., et al. (2023) · Annual Review of Pathology Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-051222-113147 · Cited by 164
Kliegr, T., Bahník, Š., & Fürnkranz, J. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103458 · Cited by 139
Scalable Bayesian Rule ListsPreprint
Yang, H., Rudin, C. D., & Seltzer, M. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.08610 · Cited by 138
Self-citationFour Principles of Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Phillips, P. J., Hahn, C. A., Fontana, P. C., Broniatowski, D. A., & Przybocki, M. A. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8312-draft · Cited by 136
Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Tabular Data: A Survey
Sahakyan, M., Aung, Z., & Rahwan, T. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3116481 · Cited by 135
“[173] use Bayesian Rule Lists (BRL) which discretize a high-dimensional, multivariate feature space into a series of interpretable decision rule lists.”
A survey on XAI and natural language explanations
Cambria, E., Malandri, L., Mercorio, F., Mezzanzanica, M., & Nobani, N. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103111 · Cited by 131
Sheu, R.-K., & Pardeshi, M. S. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22208068 · Cited by 129
Ethical machines: The human-centric use of artificial intelligence
Lepri, B., Oliver, N., & Pentland, A. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102249 · Cited by 149
Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations For Music Content Analysis.
Mishra, S., Sturm, B. L. T., & Dixon, S. (2017) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1417386 · Cited by 128
Interpreting Blackbox Models via Model ExtractionPreprint
Bastani, O., Kim, C., & Bastani, H. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.08504 · Cited by 126
Learning Optimal and Fair Decision Trees for Non-Discriminative Decision-Making
Aghaei, S., Azizi, M. J., & Vayanos, P. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011418 · Cited by 135
An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanation
Lage, I., Chen, E., He, J., Narayanan, M., Kim, B., Gershman, S., & Doshi-Velez, F. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.00006 · Cited by 125
Post-hoc explanation of black-box classifiers using confident itemsets
Moradi, M., & Samwald, M. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113941 · Cited by 130
Optimal Sparse Decision TreesPreprint
Hu, X., Rudin, C. D., & Seltzer, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.12847 · Cited by 119
Self-citationValdés, G., Luna, J. M., Eaton, E., Simone, C. B., Ungar, L., & Solberg, T. D. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep37854 · Cited by 120
Decision Tree Classification with Differential Privacy
Fletcher, S., & Islam, M. Z. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3337064 · Cited by 154
Optimized Scoring Systems: Toward Trust in Machine Learning for Healthcare and Criminal Justice
Rudin, C. D., & Ustun, B. (2018) · INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics · doi:10.1287/inte.2018.0957 · Cited by 114
Self-citationSingh, J., & Anand, A. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3289600.3290620 · Cited by 114
Learning Optimal Decision Trees with SAT
Narodytska, N., Ignatiev, A., Pereira, F., & Marques-Silva, J. P. (2018) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2018/189 · Cited by 114
Improving the Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks with Knowledge Distillation
Liu, X., Wang, X., & Matwin, S. (2018) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw.2018.00132 · Cited by 120
Explainable AI for Medical Data: Current Methods, Limitations, and Future Directions
Hossain, M. I., Zamzmi, G., Mouton, P. R., Salekin, M. S., Sun, Y., & Goldgof, D. B. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3637487 · Cited by 135
Event Prediction in the Big Data Era: A Systematic Survey
Zhao, L. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3450287 · Cited by 135
MM-Pred: A Deep Predictive Model for Multi-attribute Event Sequence
Li, L., Wen, L., & Wang, J. (2019) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611975673.14 · Cited by 109
Learning Certifiably Optimal Rule Lists for Categorical Data
Angelino, E., Larus-Stone, N., Alabi, D., Seltzer, M., & Rudin, C. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.01701 · Cited by 108
Self-citationUltra-Strong Machine Learning: comprehensibility of programs learned with ILP
Muggleton, S., Schmid, U., Zeller, C., Tamaddoni‐Nezhad, A., & Besold, T. R. (2018) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-018-5707-3 · Cited by 116
Ada-WHIPS: explaining AdaBoost classification with applications in the health sciences
Hatwell, J., Gaber, M. M., & Azad, R. M. A. (2020) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-01201-2 · Cited by 107
CHIRPS: Explaining random forest classification
Hatwell, J., Gaber, M. M., & Azad, R. M. A. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-020-09833-6 · Cited by 104
Silva, A., Schrum, M., Hedlund-Botti, E., Gopalan, N., & Gombolay, M. (2023) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2101698 · Cited by 104
Anik, A. I., & Bunt, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445736 · Cited by 103
Survey on Explainable AI: Techniques, challenges and open issues
Abusitta, A., Li, M. Q., & Fung, B. C. M. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124710 · Cited by 98
Evolving Rule-Based Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Keneni, B., Kaur, D., Bataineh, A. S. A., Devabhaktuni, V. K., Javaid, A. Y., Zaientz, J. D., & Marinier, R. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2893141 · Cited by 98
Explainable AI for Industry 5.0: Vision, Architecture, and Potential Directions
Trivedi, C., Bhattacharya, P., Prasad, V. K., Patel, V., Singh, A., Tanwar, S., Sharma, R., Aluvala, S., Pau, G., & Sharma, G. (2024) · IEEE Open Journal of Industry Applications · doi:10.1109/ojia.2024.3399057 · Cited by 110
What can AI do for me?: evaluating machine learning interpretations in cooperative play
Feng, S., & Boyd-Graber, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3301275.3302265 · Cited by 92
Simple Rules for Complex DecisionsPreprint
Jung, J., Concannon, C., Shroff, R., Goel, S., & Goldstein, D. G. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2919024 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Letham, B., Rudin, C., McCormick, T. H., & Madigan, D.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- The Annals of Applied Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2015-09-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1350-1371
- ISSN
- 1932-6157 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-7330
- OpenAlex
- W2118022153
- Cited by
- 766
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 14
- FWCI
- 47.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Annals of Applied Statistics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1053407, CAREER)
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Keywords
- interpretable classifiers, decision lists, generative models, sparsity prior, stroke risk prediction, atrial fibrillation, CHADS2 score, personalized medicine, rule-based prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
