Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,040

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Instafame: Luxury Selfies in the Attention Economy

Marwick, Alice E.·2015·Public Culture
DOI 10.1215/08992363-2798379
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The popular photo-sharing app Instagram has created a new breed of celebrities: the Instafamous. This essay examines the phenomenon—from Singaporean socialites showing off shoe collections to high school sophomores with ten thousand followers—and its relationship to celebrity and tabloid culture.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/08992363-2798379

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Alper Meryl . 2013. “War on Instagram: Framing Conflict Photojournalism with Mobile Photography Apps.” New Media and Society, September18. nms.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/09/16/1461444813504265. · DOI
  2. boyd, 2007, Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life, 119
  3. Braudy, 1986, The Frenzy of Renown: Fame and Its History
  4. Chandler Lisa Livingston Debra 2010. “Reframing the Authentic: Photography, Mobile Technologies, and the Visual Language of Digital Imperfection.” Paper presented at the Humanities, Arts, Science, and Technology Alliance and Collaboratory Contact (HASTAC) Sixth Global Conference, “Visual Literacies: Exploring Critical Issues”, Mansfield College, Oxford, UK, July 3. www.inter-disciplinary.net/at-the-interface/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/chandlervlpaper.pdf.
  5. Fairchild, 2007, Building the Authentic Celebrity: The ‘Idol’ Phenomenon in the Attention Economy, Popular Music and Society, 30, 355, 10.1080/03007760600835306 · DOI
  6. Gamson, 2011, The Unwatched Life Is Not Worth Living: The Elevation of the Ordinary in Celebrity Culture, PMLA, 126, 1061
  7. Hearn, 2008, ‘Meat, Mask, Burden’: Probing the Contours of the Branded ‘Self’, Journal of Consumer Culture, 8, 197, 10.1177/1469540508090086 · DOI
  8. Kurzman, 2007, Celebrity Status, Sociological Theory, 25, 347, 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00313.x · DOI
  9. Lair, 2005, Marketization and the Recasting of the Professional Self: The Rhetoric and Ethics of Personal Branding, Management Communication Quarterly, 18, 307, 10.1177/0893318904270744 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Lasén, 2009, Digital Photography and Picture Sharing: Redefining the Public/Private Divide, Knowledge, Technology and Policy, 22, 205, 10.1007/s12130-009-9086-8 · DOI
  11. Lee Dong-Hoo . 2005. “Women’s Creation of Camera Phone Culture.” Fibreculture Journal, no. 1. six.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-038-womens-creation-of-camera-phone-culture.
  12. Lee, 2010, Digital Cameras, Personal Photography, and the Reconfiguration of Spatial Experiences, Information Society, 26, 266, 10.1080/01972243.2010.489854 · DOI
  13. Marwick, 2013, Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age
  14. Marwick Alice, 2011, I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience, New Media and Society, 13, 114, 10.1177/1461444810365313 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Marwick Alice, 2011, To See and Be Seen: Celebrity Practice on Twitter, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 17, 139, 10.1177/1354856510394539 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Mullen Jessica . 2010. “Lifestreaming as a Life Design Methodology.” MFA thesis, University of Texas at Austin. repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/ETD-UT-2010-05-1323/MULLEN-MASTERS-REPORT.pdf.
  17. Muntean Nick Petersen Anne Helen 2009. “Celebrity Twitter: Strategies of Intrusion and Disclosure in the Age of Technoculture.” M/C Journal12, no. 1. journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/viewArticle/194. · DOI
  18. Neff, 2005, Entrepreneurial Labor among Cultural Producers: ‘Cool’ Jobs in ‘Hot’ Industries, Social Semiotics, 15, 307, 10.1080/10350330500310111 · DOI
  19. Schwarz, 2010, On Friendship, Boobs, and the Logic of the Catalogue Online Self-Portraits as a Means for the Exchange of Capital, Convergence, 16, 163, 10.1177/1354856509357582 · DOI
  20. Senft, 2008, Camgirls: Celebrity and Community in the Age of Social Networks
  21. Senft, 2013, Microcelebrity and the Branded Self, 346, 10.1002/9781118321607.ch22 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Stone, 2006, Right to the Top”, Newsweek, 9, 38
  23. Sundén, 2003, Material Virtualities
  24. Tufekci, 2013, ‘Not This One’: Social Movements, the Attention Economy, and Microcelebrity Networked Activism, American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 848, 10.1177/0002764213479369 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Turner, 2004, Understanding Celebrity, 10.4135/9781446279953 · DOI
  26. Twenge, 2009, The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement
  27. Winston Johnny . 2013. “Photography in the Age of Facebook.” Intersect: The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology and Society6, no. 1: 1–11. ojs.stanford.edu/ojs/index.php/intersect/article/view/517.
  28. Zollman, 2013, Author interview, via e-mail, August, 28

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Marwick, A. E.
Venue
Public Culture
Publisher
Duke University Press
Published
2015-01-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
137-160
ISSN
  • 0899-2363 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-8018
DOI
10.1215/08992363-2798379
OpenAlex
W1984733378
Cited by
1,040
References
3
FWCI
120.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.